umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Hazard of Tanning: Intertemporal Choices, Social Status, and Corrective Policy
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Economics.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Skin cancer is the most rapidly increasing cancer form today, our changed tanning behavior is often argued to be the main source of this development. Today a tanned skin is often associated with good health and status. If tanning is a status good and individuals have positional preferences for a suntan our own tanning-decision will create negative positional externalities on others, causing us to over-consume artificial tanning sessions. But why is it that we keep exposing ourselves to UV-light even though we know how dangerous it can be to us? The similarities between tanning and smoking are rather straightforward. Not only do studies indicate that frequent tanners show addictive-like behavior, the predominant similarity is the postponed health costs, in this case risk of skin cancer. An individual’s tanning choice is hence based on current benefits and discounted future health costs. Individuals that have present-biased preferences for immediate gratification will consume tanning sessions in a way that the future self will disagree with. Giving too little weight to future health cost will thus create internalities on the future self.

 

This study analyses optimal taxation on artificial tanning, correcting for behavioral failures generated from time-inconsistent preferences as well as the externalities caused by positional preferences for a suntan. The results indicate that sizing the tan tax equal to the health costs overlooked and the marginal externalities created generates over all improvement of welfare.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-122852OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-122852DiVA: diva2:941841
Educational program
Master´s Programme in Economics
Available from: 2016-06-23 Created: 2016-06-23 Last updated: 2016-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(844 kB)97 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 844 kBChecksum SHA-512
ebee6d28ababf9f51da2284cd20fbb9eb503602b48736fb86054732f48d38218516e217d4321e482dda545d78a03f10088d0eb49460a91bc525a092983a4d83b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Economics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 97 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 194 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf