umu.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Altered postural control strategies in quiet standing more than 20 years after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Physiotherapy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0366-4609
2016 (English)In: Gait & Posture, ISSN 0966-6362, E-ISSN 1879-2219, Vol. 46, 98-103 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Aim: To explore long-term consequences of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on postural sway and control strategies during bilateral quiet standing, in subjects treated with or without reconstructive surgery compared to uninjured controls. Method: 70 individuals who had unilateral ACL rupture 23 +/- 2.4 years ago (33 received ACL reconstructive surgery, ACL(R), and 37 had physiotherapy only, ACL(PT)) and 33 uninjured matched controls (CTRL) (mean age 46 +/- 5.3) stood quietly with eyes closed for 3 min on a firm and on a compliant surface, respectively. Center of pressure (CoP) was registered with a force plate and postural sway was calculated from center of mass (CoM) derived from 3D kinematics. Sway density (SD) analyses of CoP assessed distance and duration of stable phases. The torque controlling postural sway was estimated from CoP-CoM. Results: Comparisons across conditions to CTRL revealed larger CoP-CoM-area in ACLR (p = 0.017, Cl: 10.95, 143.10), but not in ACL(PT). Mean distance between SD-peaks was greater for ACLR (p < 0.001, Cl: 1.73, 5.31) than for ACLRT (p = 0.006, Cl: 0.56, 4.12) relative to CTRL. Duration of SD -peaks was smaller for both ACLR and ACLRT (p < 0.001, Cl: 4.04, 1.23 and 3.82, 1.03, respectively) compared to CTRL. CoM-area in the ACL-groups did not differ from CTRL. Conclusions: ACL-injured subjects demonstrated greater postural control efforts than CTRL but without significant differences in postural sway. Control efforts were thus not directly associated with sway and further research should be focused on variance in postural control strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 46, 98-103 p.
Keyword [en]
Sway density, Center of pressure, Center of mass, Postural sway
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-121557DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.02.020ISI: 000375468200018PubMedID: 27131185OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-121557DiVA: diva2:945135
Available from: 2016-06-30 Created: 2016-06-03 Last updated: 2016-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stensdotter, Ann-KatrinTengman, EvaHäger, Charlotte
By organisation
PhysiotherapyPhysiotherapy
In the same journal
Gait & Posture
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 19 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link