umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Troubling Gender Equality: Revisiting Gender Equality Work in the Famous Nordic Model Countries
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science.
2016 (English)In: Education as Change, ISSN 1682-3206, E-ISSN 1947-9417, Vol. 20, no 1, 10-27 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

This article concerns gender equality work, that is, those educational and workplace activities that involve the promotion of gender equality. It is based on research conducted in Sweden and Finland, and focuses on the period during which the public sector has become more market-oriented and project-based all over the Nordic countries. The consequences of this development on gender equality work have not yet been thoroughly analysed. Our joint empirical analysis is based on discourse-analytic methodology and two previous empirical studies. By analysing interviews conducted with people involved in gender equality work, this article emphasises the effects of market-oriented and project-based gender equality work in education and working life in Sweden and in Finland. The findings highlight an alliance between projectisation and heteronormativity that acts to regulate how gender equality ought to be talked about in order for its issues to be heard. A persistently constructed 'remedy' to 'the gender equality problem' is that girls and women are positioned as 'needing' to change more than boys and men, by adopting more traditionally 'masculine manners' and choosing to work in more 'masculine sectors'. The findings also show that the constitutive forces of these discourses provide little leeway for critical perspectives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 20, no 1, 10-27 p.
Keyword [en]
gender equality work, labour market interest, marketisation, projectisation, heteronormativity, bjectification
National Category
Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-124206DOI: 10.17159/1947-9417/2016/564ISI: 000378820900002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-124206DiVA: diva2:950743
Available from: 2016-08-02 Created: 2016-07-28 Last updated: 2017-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(409 kB)483 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 409 kBChecksum SHA-512
fc59f95283d03b796f853322ac9a428ad16d450ca39b21ac10b888bd8ccabb44dea6f50117afdea34fffd772a7fba83e734f03cd6b682edf9db928b010768ee0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edström, Charlotta
By organisation
Department of applied educational science
In the same journal
Education as Change
Gender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 483 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 649 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf