umu.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: European Urology, ISSN 0302-2838, E-ISSN 1873-7560, Vol. 70, no 1, 64-71 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective: To investigate short-and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations: Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d (p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04-4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP-12 d versus 15 d-but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions: RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary: We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 70, no 1, 64-71 p.
Keyword [en]
Disability pension, Prostate cancer, Prostatectomy, Retropubic radical prostatectomy, Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy, Return to work, Sick leave, Sweden, Work disability
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123046DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049ISI: 000377290100027PubMedID: 26782345OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-123046DiVA: diva2:954446
Available from: 2016-08-22 Created: 2016-06-27 Last updated: 2016-08-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stattin, Pär
By organisation
Urology and Andrology
In the same journal
European Urology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 3 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link