umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Teacher ambivalence towards school evaluation: promoting and ruining teacher professionalism
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science.
2016 (English)In: Education Inquiry, ISSN 2000-4508, E-ISSN 2000-4508, Vol. 7, no 3, 305-325 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Today’s evaluation society makes teachers participate in a stream of external evaluations. How teachers experience evaluation in school and how this affects their work and professionalism is the focus of this article. Teachers’ views of external and internal evaluations and of the consequences for school practice are described and analysed. The interviewed teachers emphasised the importance of internal evaluations performed close to daily teaching practice and jointly with students and colleagues. These evaluations are generally overlooked in evaluation and school-policy research and seldom attended to or appreciated by school providers. Further, teachers were critical of and reported several negative consequences of accountability and external evaluations, but still generally complied by participating in them. The present results are discussed in relation to professional responsibility and accountability as well as to possible constitutive effects. By emphasising that their daily informal evaluations represent their efforts to improve teaching, teachers are describing parts of their professional responsibility. However, the negative consequences of external evaluations signal constitutive effects on teachers’ work, described as making it less creative, discretionary and autonomous as well as increasing mistrust, meaning that more tests are required in order to legitimate student grades.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Co-Action Publishing , 2016. Vol. 7, no 3, 305-325 p.
Keyword [en]
evaluation society, informal evaluations, school practice, teacher work, teacher views
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-125181DOI: 10.3402/edui.v7.30200OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-125181DiVA: diva2:962788
Available from: 2016-09-07 Created: 2016-09-07 Last updated: 2016-12-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(343 kB)42 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 343 kBChecksum SHA-512
6a61b5c00c85dc33f7ef861a7659167f5ce6fb71fac4f02de9992ee32371ab49777b0e8e9f16d54c4b1a02a666a6ced0c0cf25069afa000d2373e7e331de8a0a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hult, AgnetaEdström, Charlotta
By organisation
Department of EducationDepartment of applied educational science
In the same journal
Education Inquiry
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 42 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf