Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Incentives, Equity and the Able Chooser Problem
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies. (Philosophy)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1689-0648
(English)In: Journal of Medical Ethics, ISSN 0306-6800, E-ISSN 1473-4257Article in journal (Refereed) In press
Abstract [en]

Health incentive schemes aim to produce healthier behaviors in target populations. They may do so both by making incentivized options more salient and by making them less costly. Changes in costs only result in healthier behavior if the individual rationally assesses the cost change and acts accordingly. Not all people do this well. Those that fail to respond rationally to incentives will typically include those who are least able to make prudent choices more generally. This group will typically include the least advantaged more generally, since disadvantage inhibits one's effective ability to choose well and since poor choices tend to cause or aggravate disadvantage. Therefore, within the target population, health benefits to the better off may come at the cost of aggravated inequity. This is one instance of a problem I name the Able Chooser Problem, previously emphasized by Richard Arneson in relation to coercive paternalism. I describe and discuss this problem by distinguishing between policy options and their effects on the choice situation of individuals. Both positive and negative incentives, as well as mandates that are less than perfectly effective, require some sort of rational deliberation and action and so face the Able Chooser Problem. In contrast, effective restriction of what options are physically available, as well as choice context design that makes some options more salient or appealing, do not demand rational agency. These considerations provide an equity-based argument for preferring smart design of our choice and living environment to incentives and mandates.

Keyword [en]
Paternalism, Behaviour Modification, Distributive Justice, Public Health Ethics, Public Policy
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-125899DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103378OAI: diva2:972632
Libertarian Paternalism and the Moral Limits of Public Health Policy
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-2189
Available from: 2016-09-21 Created: 2016-09-21 Last updated: 2016-09-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grill, Kalle
By organisation
Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies
In the same journal
Journal of Medical Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link