umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Epistemic modals and credal disagreement
Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and IdeasUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
2015 (English)In: Philosophical Studies, ISSN 0031-8116, E-ISSN 1573-0883, Vol. 172, no 4, 987-1011 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Considerations involving disagreement, as well as related considerations involving correction and retraction, have played an important role in recent debates about epistemic modals. For instance, it has been argued that contextualist views about epistemic modals have problems when it comes to explaining cases of disagreement. In response to these challenges, I explore the idea that the relevant cases of disagreement may involve credal disagreement. In a case of credal disagreement, the parties have different degrees of belief or credences. There does not have to be a difference in outright beliefs in order for the parties to disagree. I argue that the idea of credal disagreement allows us to make sense of otherwise problematic cases of disagreement involving epistemic modals. I also discuss how these ideas can be extended to cases of correction and retraction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2015. Vol. 172, no 4, 987-1011 p.
Keyword [en]
Context-dependence, Contextualism, Disagreement, Epistemic modals
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-126163DOI: 10.1007/s11098-014-0334-8ISI: 000351097700010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-126163DiVA: diva2:998757
Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Huvenes, Torfinn Thomesen
In the same journal
Philosophical Studies
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf