Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
123 1 - 50 of 104
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Antoine, Duval
    et al.
    TMC Asser Instituut, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
    Krüger, Alexander
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Made in Europe: lex sportiva as embedded transnational law2024In: The European roots of the lex sportiva: how Europe rules global sport / [ed] Antoine Duval; Alexander Krüger; Johan Lindholm, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2024, 1, p. 1-14Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Ingmanson, Staffan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Grundläggande EU-rätt2015 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Boken är uppdelad i tre delar: Den första delen beskriver EU och EU-rätten, vad som kännetecknar EU:s rättsordning och hur unionsrätten förhåller sig till nationell rätt. Den andra delen förklarar målen för EU:s verksamhet och hur de ska uppnås. Den tredje delen behandlar EU-rätten från skrift till verklighet, det vill säga de rättsliga mekanismer och processer som garanterar EU-rättens genomslag.På ett tydligt och pedagogiskt sätt beskrivs EU-rättens innehåll, logik och systematik. Såväl individuella rättsregler som de institutioner som utvecklar och verkställer dessa regler behandlas.Grundläggande EU-rätt är i första hand tänkt att användas som en introduktion till EU-rätten på universitets- och högskoleutbildningar. Den vänder sig också till personer som i sitt arbete behöver grundläggande kunskaper i ämnet.

  • 3.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Ingmanson, Staffan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Grundläggande EU-rätt2021 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Grundläggande EU-rätt är en introduktionsbok till EU-rätten och förklarar EU:s rättsordning ur tre perspektiv: konstitutionellt, institutionellt och materielrättsligt. På ett tydligt och pedagogiskt sätt beskrivs EU-rättens innehåll, logik och systematik. Såväl individuella rättsregler som de institutioner som utvecklar och verkställer dessa regler behandlas.

  • 4.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Leidö, Jan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Att bli jurist: råd för att lyckas och trivas på juristutbildningen2020In: Vänbok till Ulf Israelsson / [ed] Mattias Derlén, Lena Landström, Nina Nilsson Rådeström, Umeå: Juridiska institutionen, Umeå universitet , 2020, p. 25-41Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Ulf Israelsson, mångårig studierektor, medarbetare och juridiska institutionens primus motor, vet vad som krävs för att bli en bra jurist. Ulf har, bland mycket annat, bidragit till juristutbildningens kvalitetsarbete genom att utföra enkäter med studenter som tagit examen. I enkäten som genomfördes 2018 kommenterade en tidigare student att "[d]et var 4,5 fantastiska år där jag lärde mig otroligt mycket". Det är naturligtvis tillfredställande för alla oss som undervisar på juristprogrammet när en student är nöjd med sin utbildning, men det viktiga är den senare delen av citatet. Att bli jurist kräver mycket arbete. Nio terminers hårt arbete kommer också att förändra de som börjar programmet. Vissa går så långt som att hävda att många juriststudenter upplever en intellektuell pånyttfödelse under första året på utbildningen. Det är inte möjligt att i detta sammanhang beskriva alla de utmaningar som studenter på juristprogrammet kommer att möta, men vi har identifierat tre centrala aspekter som alla juriststudenter måste förhålla sig till. Studenterna måste för det första lära sig att prata som en jurist, för det andra att arbeta som en jurist och för det tredje att hantera andra juriststudenter. Det kommer inte att vara enkelt, men vi lovar att det är värt det.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 5.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bosman: a legacy beyond sports2016In: The legacy of Bosman: revisiting the relationship between EU law and sport / [ed] Antoine Duval & Ben Van Rompuy, Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016, p. 31-49Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The 1995 Bosman case from the CJEU is one of the most famous judgments ever delivered by the Luxembourg court. It is well-known in sporting contexts, but this article takes the discussion beyond that area, demonstrating Bosman's importance in other areas of law by using network analysis. This illustrates that Bosman is an exceptional case, both in its own right and as a source of further cases, citing Bosman directly or indirectly. We also demonstrate that Bosman is primarily cited for four reasons: the jurisdiction of the CJEU in matters of preliminary rulings, the use of the fundamental freedoms against private entities, non-discriminatory obstacles on the internal market and the temporal effects of CJEU judgments. However, when analyzed further it becomes clear that the Bosman case contains few truly original contributions to EU law and largely builds on existing case law to draw important conclusions. Thus, the Court must have other reasons for citing Bosman. Given the characteristics of the case many such reasons are plausible. Bosman is well-written, well-reasoned, well-known and well-connected, making it an excellent source to use in future cases.

  • 6.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bosman som spindeln i nätet: Bosmans betydelse bortom idrott2016In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, Vol. 19, no 4, p. 685-702Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Cases and materials on EU law2007Book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions2015In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, E-ISSN 2071-8322, Vol. 16, no 5, p. 1073-1098Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is one of the most important sources of European Union law. However, case law’s role in EU law is not uniform. By empirically studying how the Court uses its own case law as a source of law, we explore the correlation between, on the one hand, the characteristics of a CJEU case— type of action, actors involved, and area of law—and, on the other hand, the judgment’s “embeddedness” in previous case law and value as a precedent in subsequent cases. Using this approach, we test, confirm, and debunk existing scholarship concerning the role of CJEU case law as a source of EU law. We offer the following conclusions: that CJEU case law cannot be treated as a single entity; that only a limited number of factors reliably affect a judgment’s persuasive or precedential power; that the Court’s use of its own case law as a source of law is particularly limited in successful infringement proceedings; that case law is particularly important in preliminary references—especially those concerning fundamental freedoms and competition law; and that initiating Member State and the number of observations affects the behavior of the Court. 

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 9.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Direktivs verkan före genomförandefristens utgång: preliminär, begränsad eller fullständig indirekt effekt?2007In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, no 1, p. 83-112Article in journal (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 10.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    EG & EU-fördragen: EC & EU Treaties2007 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Europeiska unionens fördrag2009 (ed. 3)Book (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    EU-rättens framtid som rättsvetenskaplig disciplin: början på slutet eller slutet på början?2017In: Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år / [ed] Örjan Edström, Johan Lindholm, Ruth Mannelqvist, Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2017, p. 79-88Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 13.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Festskrift till Pär Hallström: Volume in Honor of Pär Hallström2012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 14.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Fra.bo, en viktig bit i pusslet om de grundläggande friheternas horisontella verkan2012In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, Vol. 15, no 4, p. 707-721Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Från Champagne till Ramlösa: EU-domstolens rättspraxis i svenska underinstanser2017In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, no 4, p. 695-716Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 16.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Goodbye van Gend en Loos, Hello Bosman?: Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments2014In: European Law Journal, ISSN 1351-5993, E-ISSN 1468-0386, Vol. 20, no 5, p. 667-687Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    It is generally agreed that some judgments by the Court of Justice are more important than others, but the ability of traditional legal methods to identify such judgments is inherently limited. In this article, we apply various tools developed in network analysis to identify which judgments are the most important as legal precedents. The study reveals that certain well-known judgments, like van Gend en Loos, have limited importance as precedents, while other judgments, like BosmanPreussenElektra and Schumacker, are likely overlooked.

  • 17.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Introduction: Europarättsdagarna 20152016In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, Vol. 19, no 4, p. 667-668Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 18.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Is it good law?: network analysis and the CJEU's internal market jurisprudence2017In: Journal of international economic law (Oxford), ISSN 1369-3034, E-ISSN 1464-3758, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 257-277Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    An increasing number of legal scholars have been attracted to using network analysis, particularly by the possibility of conducting large-scale studies of case law. In this article, we discuss how network analysis can provide new and important information about the law governing the European Union’s internal market by making possible the study of the entire jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), including changes over time. We apply different network centrality measurements to key CJEU internal market decisions and compare how accurately they capture the precedential and persuasive power of case law. In so doing, we reach conclusions that can be used to better understand not only the law of the internal market, but also the law of any case law-driven jurisdiction such as WTO dispute settlement or investor–state arbitration.

  • 19.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Judiciell aktivism eller prejudikatbildning?: en empirisk granskning av Högsta domstolen2016In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 2, p. 143-158Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Ett antal kommentatorer har hävdat att Högsta domstolen under senare år intagit en ny, friare roll i förhållande till lagstiftaren. Debatten har framförallt kommit att gälla ett antal enskilda och kontroversiella domar som enligt vissa debattörer kan beskrivas som ”judiciell aktivism”. Mot bakgrund av denna debatt och utifrån ett omfattande empiriskt material studerar vi hur Högsta domstolens verksamhet utvecklats över tid. Studien bekräftar att Högsta domstolen genomgått en omfattande förändring, men att det handlar om att domstolen under längre tid utvecklats till en tydligare och aktivare prejudikatinstans, snarare än ett plötsligt utslag av judiciell aktivism.

  • 20.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Mickelsson: två män på vattenskoter vänder upp-och-ner på fri rörlighet för varor2009In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, Vol. 94, no 10, p. 1072-1086Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    EG-domstolen avkunnade nyligen dom i Mickelsson, ett mål som gällde begränsningar av bruket av vattenskotrar i svenska vatten. Domen i Mickelsson belyser en föga diskuterad dimension av den redan komplicerade frågan om hur principen om fri rörlighet ska tillämpas och, närmare bestämt, vad som utgör en sådan åtgärd med motsvarande verkan som en kvantitativ restriktion (ÅMV) vilken är förbjuden enligt artikel 28 EG. Brukanderegler av det slag som behandlades i Mickelsson passar inte den traditionella uppdelningen i produktregler och försäljningsåtgärder som EG-domstolen etablerade i Keck. Denna artikel undersöker EG-domstolens praxis kring brukanderegler med utgångspunkt i Mickelsson och det relaterade målet mellankommissionen och Italien. Dessa domar klargör hur brukandereglers förenlighetmed artikel 28 EG ska bedömas. Genom domarna har dock EG-domstolen även tagit ett viktigt steg mot en förenklad tillämpning av artikel 28 i allmänhet.

  • 21.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Not enough room for optimal choices?: The European legal framework for green taxes2011In: Green taxation in East Asia / [ed] Richard Cullen, Jefferson VanderWolk and Yan Xu, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, p. 167-208Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 22.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Peek-a-boo, it’s a case law system!: Comparing the european court of justice and the United States supreme court from a network perspective2017In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, E-ISSN 2071-8322, Vol. 18, no 3, p. 647-686Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have had an immense impact on development of European Union law, and this has raised a critical discussion about how the CJEU establishes and uses case law. Through a comparison with the United States Supreme Court (USSC) and network analysis, this article argues that much of the criticism is based on false expectations as to the nature of the CJEU. We argue that the Court of Justice must be understood as a precedent-driven constitutional court and that, if we take that as our starting point, its approach to case law is quite reasonable.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 23.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Perspektiv på prejudikat: En empirisk undersökning av tingsrätternas bruk av Högsta domstolens rättspraxis i tvistemål2019In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 8, p. 751-772Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Betydelsen av HD:s avgöranden som prejudikat har rönt allt större uppmärksamhet, främst med fokus på hur HD själv ser på sin rättspraxis. Denna artikel kompletterar diskussionen genom att undersöka tingsrätternas bruk av prejudikat. Artikeln visar att endast en relativt liten andel av HD:s avgöranden används aktivt i tingsrätterna och att överlappningen mellan de avgöranden som används av tingsrätterna och de som används av HD själv är ytterst begränsad. En möjlig förklaring är att HD i hög grad prövar frågor som mycket sällan uppkommer i tingsrätterna. Detta är inte nödvändigtvis problematiskt, men motiverar en diskussion om hur HD bäst kan leda rättstillämpningen.

  • 24.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Serving two masters: CJEU case law in Swedish first instance courts and national courts of precedent as gatekeepers2018In: The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives / [ed] Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018, p. 79-99Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The paper seeks to determine to what extent lower national courts are influenced by higher national courts in their application of CJEU case law. In doing so, we study and compare references to CJEU case law in the jurisprudence of Swedish courts of first instance and courts of precedent. We find that Swedish courts of first instance generally speaking identify and apply relevant CJEU case law independent of whether this has been dealt with by Swedish CoP or not. However, when these courts find and cite a Swedish court of precedent decision concerning an issue relating to EU law, they do not consistely consider relevant CJEU case law.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 25.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives2018Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    In 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union celebrates sixty-five years and has thereby achieved retirement age in most EU Member States, including Luxembourg. If it were to retire, the Court would be able to look back at an exciting journey, from its relatively humble beginning on 4 December 1952 as part of the then brand-new European Coal and Steel Community to one of the most important and exciting judicial institutions in Europe, perhaps in the entire world.

    The need to understand the CJEU has never been greater. This volume is dedicated to improving our understanding of the Court in relationship to other actors, including other EU institutions, the Member State, national courts, third countries, and international organizations. It is based on a conference arranged by the Swedish Network for European Legal Studies (SNELS) held at Stockholm University in December 2016, and includes contributions by both lawyers and researchers in other fields, as well as current members of the Court.

  • 26.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Three Ideas: The Scope of EU Law Protecting Against Discrimination2012In: Festskrift till Pär Hallström: Volume in honor of Pär Hallström / [ed] Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2012, p. 77-100Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The issue of when EU law applies, its scope, is obviously important and yet it has no clear answer. Two extreme positions are that EU law has a general scope, which it does not, and that all EU law provisions have different scopes, which clarifies nothing. This article explores the middle ground by seeking to identify underlying ideas capable of explaining when different EU law provisions apply on the national level and why seemingly similar provisions differ in scope. The article studies under what conditions an individual seeking protection against discrimination can invoke EU law on the national level and concludes that EU law provisions preventing discrimination differ greatly in scope but that such differences can be explained by the fact that they are based on different ideas: the idea of the internal market, the idea of actor equivalence, or the idea of a Europe without borders.

  • 27.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    What happened to the revolution?: one decade with Trailers and MEQRs2019In: Festskrift till Örjan Edström / [ed] Ruth Mannelqvist, Staffan Ingmanson, Carin Ulander-Wänman, Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University , 2019, p. 91-108Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    In 2009 the CJEU delivered its judgment in the so-called Trailers case, offering a new perspective on the enigmatic ban on measures having an equivalent effect to a quantitative restrictions (MEQRs). Trailers was a positive, even necessary, development in an area fraught with complications but it left many questions as to the future direction of the CJEU. One decade on, and after several notable judgments, we are now in a position to return to those questions. This contribution explores the impact of Trailers and the relevance today of seminal MEQR decisions like DassonvilleKeck and Cassis de Dijon.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 28.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Markus, Naarttijärvi
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Konstitutionell rätt2016 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I en tid då skyddet för grundläggande rättigheter och värnet mot otillbörlig maktutövning blir allt mer aktuellt är den konstitutionella rättens betydelse för rättssystemet och rättsstaten påtaglig. De gränser som den konstitutionella rätten ställer upp för utövandet av offentlig makt ökar således i betydelse, men samtidigt blir det konstitutionellrättsliga läget allt mer komplext, inte minst på grund av europarättens inflytande.Konstitutionell rätt behandlar den konstitutionella rättens tre centrala teman:Maktdelning och andra förutsättningar för utövande av offentlig makt, skyddet för grundläggande rättigheter samt rättsligt genomdrivande av konstitutionellrättsliga normer. Utifrån dessa tre teman behandlar författarna konstitutionella bestämmelser med ursprung i svensk nationell rätt, EU-rätten och Europakonventionen om mänskliga rättigheter.Boken är anpassad för att kunna användas som lärobok på juristutbildningen, men riktar sig också till en bredare publik. Konstitutionell rätt är relevant läsning för såväl erfarna jurister som läsare som är intresserade av konstitutionella frågor mer allmänt.

  • 29.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Naarttijärvi, Markus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Konstitutionell rätt2020 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I turbulenta tider, då grundläggande rättigheter och begränsningar för maktutövning utmanas, ökar betydelsen av de gränser som den konstitutionella rätten ställer upp för utövandet av offentlig makt. Samtidigt blir det konstitutionellrättsliga läget allt mer komplext, inte minst på grund av europarättens inflytande.

    Konstitutionell rätt behandlar den konstitutionella rättens tre centrala teman: maktdelning och andra förutsättningar för utövande av offentlig makt, skyddet för grundläggande rättigheter samt rättsligt genomdrivande av konstitutionellrättsliga normer. Utifrån dessa tre teman behandlar författarna konstitutionella bestämmelser med ursprung i svensk nationell rätt, EU-rätten och Europakonventionen om mänskliga rättigheter.

    Boken är anpassad för att kunna användas som lärobok på juristutbildningen, men riktar sig också till en bredare publik. Konstitutionell rätt är relevant läsning för såväl erfarna jurister som läsare som är intresserade av konstitutionella frågor mer allmänt. Denna andra upplaga är påtagligt omarbetad och utvidgad.

  • 30.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Naurin, Daniel
    Political Science, PluriCourts, University of Oslo; Department of Political Science and the Centre for European Research (CERGU), University of Gothenburg.
    You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone!: The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU2019In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, no 3, p. 381-395Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Brexit is scheduled to happen on October 31, 2019, and researchers have previously studied the impact of Brexit on relationships in the EU’s political institutions. This paper studies how Brexit might affect Member States’ interactions with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and, more specifically, when they seek to influence the Court by submitting observations. The Untied Kingdom has consistently been a comparatively active Member State, submitting many observations. The paper introduces and employs a novel approach, studying what we call "mentions" in CJEU decisions, to measure position similarity in Member States' observations and to identify the UK's "allies" before the CJEU. The paper concludes the loss of the UK will be felt in particular in Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland and in the Nordic countries. 

  • 31.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Rosvall, Martin
    Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Physics.
    Mirshahvalad, Atieh
    Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Physics.
    Coherence out of chaos: mapping European union law by running randomly through the maze of CJEU case law2013In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, no 3, p. 517-535Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [no]

    Recent research has demonstrated the ability of network analysis to better understand law. In this study we apply network analysis to the case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) in order understand its role as a source of law. In doing so, we apply network analysis tools not previously used in legal scholarship, most significantly (i) a modified version of the PageRank algorithm, (ii) the Map Equation, and (iii) resampling to infer “missing” links. In the article we demonstrate that this method can help us to understand not only the CJEU’s case law but law generally.

  • 32.
    Duval, Antoine
    et al.
    TMC Asser Instituut, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
    Krüger, AlexanderUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    The European roots of the lex sportiva: how Europe rules global sport2024Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This open access book explores the complexity of the lex sportiva, the transnational legal regime governing international sports. Pioneering in its approach, it maps out the many entanglements of the transnational governance of sports with European legal processes and norms. The contributors trace the embeddedness of the lex sportiva within national law, European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the volume emphasizes the capacity of sports governing bodies to leverage the resources of national law to spread the lex sportivaglobally, it also points at the fact that European legal processes are central when challenging the status quo as illustrated recently in the Semenya and Superleague cases. Ultimately, the book is also a vantage point to start critically investigating the Eurocentricity and the complex materiality underpinning the lex sportiva.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 33.
    Edström, Örjan
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.Mannelqvist, RuthUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år2017Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet bildades år 1977. Med anledning av 40-årsfirandet presenteras i denna jubileumsskrift 20 bidrag skrivna av 33 forskare och lärare verksamma vid institutionen. Både juristprogrammet och den forskning som bedrivs vid institutionen har med tiden blivit fast etablerade som en del av de svenska universiteten. Forskningen har i takt med internationaliseringen utvecklats och många forskare är etablerade både på nationell och internationell nivå. De olika bidragen speglar undervisning och forskning vid institutionen. De handlar såväl om juristprogrammets etablering och utveckling som olika aktuella projekt och forskningsområden som utvecklats vid institutionen.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 34. Garcia-Garcia, Borja
    et al.
    James, Mark
    Koller, Dionne
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Mavromati, Despina
    Parrish, Richard
    Rodenberg, Ryan
    The impact of Covid-19 on sports: a mid-way assessment2020In: International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 20, no 3-4, p. 115-119Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 35.
    Groussot, Xavier
    et al.
    University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; European College of Paris (Paris II, Panthéon-Assas), Paris, France.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    General principles: taking rights seriously and waving the rule-of-law stick in the European Union2022In: Research handbook on general principles in EU law: constructing legal orders in Europe / [ed] Katja S. Ziegler; Päivi J. Neuvonen; Violeta Moreno-Lax, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, p. 308-326Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the doctrinal debate on general principles mainly centred on the study of the protection and development of individual rights (the rights-principles debate). In essence, this debate is similar to the study of general principles qua EU fundamental rights. Yet, with the impulse of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), it has now moved to a debate on the use of general principles by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to apply and enforce the rule of law in the European Union (the rule of law-principles debate). What is the relationship, if any, between the rights-principles debate and the rule of law-principles debate? The aim of this Chapter is to show the evolution of the debate on general principles; to understand the intrinsic reasons of this shift; and to display its consequences for the theory on general principles and for the EU legal order. Section II looks at the relationship between the general principles and the rule of law, Section III focuses on the analysis of the general principles qua fundamental rights. Section IV focuses on the analysis of the general principles qua rule of law. Section V draws the consequences of the existence of a 'Dworkinian administration' on the doctrine of general principles. Section VI is the conclusion.

  • 36.
    Hultqvist, Anders
    et al.
    Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Introduction2023In: The power to tax in Europe / [ed] Johan Lindholm; Anders Hultqvist, Oxford; London; New York; New Delhi; Sydney: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2023, p. 1-2Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 37.
    Kaburakis, Anastasios
    et al.
    Saint Louis University.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Rodenberg, Ryan
    Florida State University.
    British Pubs, Decoder Cards, and the Future of Intellectual Property Licensing after Murphy2012In: The Columbia journal of European law, ISSN 1076-6715, Vol. 18, no 2, p. 307-322Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 38.
    Larsson, Olof
    et al.
    University of Gothenburg.
    Naurin, Daniel
    University of Oslo.
    Derlén, Mattias
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Speaking law to power: the strategic use of precedent of the court of justice of the European Union2017In: Comparative Political Studies, ISSN 0010-4140, E-ISSN 1552-3829, Vol. 50, no 7, p. 879-907Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    We argue that courts may increase their autonomy and effectiveness by persuading governmental actors, who have powers over the societal impact of judicial decisions, of the legal quality of their rulings. This view combines a strategic perspective on judicial decision making with a conception of persuasion that allows courts to widen their zone of discretion. We support our argument with data from the European Union, where we find that the Court of Justice improves its legal justifications—by embedding its decisions in case law—when it faces a more adverse political environment. Our findings suggest both that the limits of judicial independence are set largely by political preferences, and that legal rhetoric may be an opportunity for courts to extend their room for maneuver. They also indicate that political audiences may indirectly influence the development of case law, by triggering courts to engage in precedent. 

  • 39.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    A global take on legal aspects of fantasy sports2021In: International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 21, no 3, p. 119-120Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 40.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    A legit supreme court of world sports?: The CAS(e) for reform2021In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 21, no 1-2, p. 1-5Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Alla idrottsliga regler måste vara förenliga med EG-rätten - EG-domstolen begränsar idrottens rättsliga särställning2008In: Svensk Idrottsforskning: Organ för Centrum för Idrottsforskning, ISSN 1103-4629, no 2, p. 34-34Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 42.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Artikel 165 FEUF: ett genombrott i EU-rättens förhållande till idrotten?2011In: Artikelsamling. 2011 / [ed] Krister Malmsten, Stockholm: Svensk idrottsjuridisk förening , 2011, p. 160-175Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 43.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bara vara vänner?: Bilsportmålets betydelse för bredd- och elitidrott2012In: Artikelsamling 2012, Stockholm: SISU Idrottsböcker , 2012, Vol. 17, p. 105-114Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 44.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bra medicin smakar beskt: CAS 2017/A/5015 och 5110, FIS mot Johaug2017In: Artikelsamling 2017 / [ed] Krister Malmsten, Stockholm: Svensk idrottsjuridisk förening , 2017, p. 79-93Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 45.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Can I Please Have a Slice of Ronaldo?: The Legality of FIFA's ban on Third-Party Ownership under European Union Law2016In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 15, no 3-4, p. 137-148Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Trading football players is a massive, global business where several single trades have brought in more than $100 million in transfer fees. This has brought about a business practice where third-party investors provide or receive a share of the transfer fees, so-called third-party ownership. However, effective May 1, 2015, FIFA has imposed a worldwide ban on this practice. In the face of already-initiated legal challenges, this article considers whether the ban is compatible with European Union law. It finds that the ban violates both free movement rights and competition law and that FIFA would be well-served to consider a less restrictive measure.

  • 46.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Case C-325/08, Olympique Lyonnais SASP v. Olivier Bernard and Newcastle United UFC, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 20102010In: Common market law review, ISSN 0165-0750, E-ISSN 1875-8320, Vol. 47, no 4, p. 1187-1197Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 47.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Court of Arbitration for Sport: En framgångsrik trettiofemåring med begynnande medelålderskris?2019In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, E-ISSN 2002-3545, Vol. 2019/20, no 2, p. 482-492Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 48.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    'DCFR, please meet national procedure':  enforcing the frame of reference using national procedural law2011In: The Foundations of European Private Law / [ed] Roger Brownsword, Hans-W Micklitz, Leone Niglia, Stephen Weatherill, Oxford: Hart Publishing , 2011, p. 465-486Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 49.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Det europeiska småmålsförfarandet - en liten början till något stort?2008In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 10, p. 848-866Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Småmålsförordningen, som träder i kraft den 1 januari 2009, innebär att EG-rätten på ett mer genomgripande sätt än tidigare påverkar nationell processrätt. Det europeiska småmålsförfarandet innehåller ett flertal nya regler som kan ersätta reglerna i rättegångsbalken i tvistemål av gränsöverskridande karaktär. I artikeln presenteras de ur ett svenskt perspektiv centrala aspekterna av småmålsförordningen.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 50.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Does Legislating Against Doping in Sports Make Sense? Comparing Sweden and the U.S. Suggests Not2013In: Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 1556-9799, Vol. 13, no 1, p. 21-34Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Both policy makers and sport stakeholders have fought against doping since the 1960’s but largely separately from each other. In light of recent events, political discussion, and academic debate, this article considers the expediency of using legislation to fight doping in sports. Building upon and comparing experiences in the U.S. and in Sweden, this article concludes that increased governmental involvement is undesirable from both the policy makers’ and the sport stakeholders’ perspectives. The reasons for this conclusion are, primarily, (i) that they are driven by different aims, (ii) that they differ in what they consider doping, (iii) that policy makers may push rules in sports in an unwanted direction, (iv) that expanded government involvement increases the likelihood of fundamental rights challenges to sport rules, and (v) that there are alternative ways of enhancing existing rules’ efficiency.

123 1 - 50 of 104
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf