umu.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Political parties, delegation and europeanisation: A conceptual framework2007In: EUSA-konferens, Montreal Kanada, 2007Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 2.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    The European parliament election in Sweden, June 13 20042004In: 2004 European Parliament Election Briefing Paper, no 7Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 3. Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Political Parties in Multi-Level Polities: The Nordic Countries Compared2013 (ed. 1)Book (Refereed)
  • 4.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Södertörn.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Principals, agents, parties and the EU2008In: Statsvetenskapliga förbundets årsmöte 2008, Uppsala Sverige, 2008Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 5. Bale, Tim
    et al.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Close but no cigar?: Newly governing and nearly governing parties in Sweden and in New Zealand2008In: New parties in government: in power for the first time / [ed] Kris Deschouwer, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 85-103Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 6. Berg, Linda
    et al.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Lewander, Jakob
    EU-skeptikernas frammarsch: valet till Europaparlamentet 20142014Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I slutet av maj 2014 hölls för åttonde gången direktval till Europaparlamentet och väljare i 28 medlemsstater gick till valurnorna. Trenden med stadigt sjunkande valdeltagande stannade av och närmare 43 procent av väljarna röstade. Som Mark Franklin visade i en Sieps-publikation inför valet förklaras trenden med sjunkande valdeltagande till stor del av att EU har utvidgats och att de medlemsstater som tillkommit har haft ett lägre valdeltagande än de som har varit medlemmar en tid. Därför är den brutna trenden kanske inte så förvånande.

    Valkampanjen bedrevs i en kontext där den ekonomiska krisen alltjämt påverkade EU starkt. Även om eurozonen gradvis har stabiliserats, är effekterna av krisen alltjämt tydliga. Resultatet återspeglar en reaktion hos väljarna som vi känner igen från tidigare Europaparlamentsval, där större partier, i synnerhet i regeringsställning, gör sämre ifrån sig än vid nationella val. Konsekvensen den här gången blev att den politiska “mitten” tappade och flankerna i det framväxande europeiska partisystemet växte. De EU-kritiska partierna fick stor uppmärksamhet under valrörelsen och valresultaten kan delvis tolkas som en protest mot EU, även om det finns skillnader mellan medlemsstaterna och vilka uttryck kritiken tar sig. De politiska majoritetsförhållandena och utvecklingen inom partigrupperna analyseras i den här publikationen av Magnus Blomgren.

    I Sverige var valkampanjen intensiv och det påföljande riksdagsvalet hade sannolikt en roll i det. Två nya partier, Feministiskt initiativ och Sverigedemokraterna, lyckades vinna mandat medan Piratpartiet inte lyckades upprepa succén från 2009 och tappade sina mandat. Det svenska resultatet analyseras här av Linda Berg.

    Texterna i den här publikationen utgörs främst av bearbetningar av bidrag vid seminariet Valet är över – vad händer nu? som arrangerades i Stockholm den 28 maj. Det är min förhoppning att Sieps därmed ska kunna bidra till fördjupad förståelse för Europaparlamentsval och parlamentets funktionssätt.

    Jörgen Hettne Tillförordnad direktör

  • 7.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Ett sammanlänkat statsskick!2005In: EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick, Liber, Malmö , 2005, p. 11-33Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    EU-hybriden och den representativa demokratin: positioner och framtidsperspektiv2019In: EU och nationalstatens återkomst / [ed] Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Anna Michalski, Lars Oxelheim, Stockholm: Santérus Academic Press Sweden, 2019, 1, p. 37-64Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Okunnigt i medierna om Europavalet2004Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 10.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Board, Joseph
    Constitutional policy2006In: XX IPSA World Congress 2006 Fukouka, Japan, 2006Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 11.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Müller, Wolfgang C
    Strøm, Kaare
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-national Patterns2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies., Oxford University Press, Oxford , 2003Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Candidate Selection to the European Parliament: A Comparative Study of Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden1999In: ECPR joint workshop 1999 i Mannheim, Tyskland, 1999Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Contacts between the MEPs and the national political arena: Arguments for further research2003In: Statsvetenskapliga förbundets årsmöte 2003, Umeå Sverige, 2003Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 14.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Cross-Pressure and Political Representation in Europe: A comparative study of MEPs and the intra-party arena2003Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This dissertation explores political representation and its manifestation within the European Union (EU). The main purpose is to examine the representative roles of Members of the European Parliament (MEP) in the context of cross–pressure between the national level and the EU level. This involves an analysis of how the MEPs under-stand their roles, how they organize their work, and how they have voted in the European Parliament (EP) in 1999-2002. It also includes a study of how national party organizations adapt to the EU environment and how this influences the MEPs link to the national arena. The study is based on various sources, such as interviews, formal documents and voting data.

    The most under-researched part of the cross-pressure has been the national link and the empirical focus of the thesis is on that link. It is a comparative study of parties in Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden. In each country, three parties were selected (social democratic, right-wing and green parties). By using a focused comparative method, and by controlling for certain independent variables, the ambition is to go beyond description and identify explanations for why MEPs adopt certain roles.

    The overall picture that emerges is of a relatively weak link between MEPs and the national level. To a certain extent, MEPs express frustration over their limited role in the national arena and over the lack of input from the national arena in their work at the European level. Most of the parties struggle to include MEPs in their organizational set-up, and the MEPs experience a growing hostility within the parties toward them. In general, the lack of interest and knowledge in the national arena, concerning the EU in general and specifically the work of the MEPs, obscures the role of the MEPs. They become EU ambassadors at the national level, rather than elected representatives at the EU level.

    The dissertation also tests variables that are thought to influence MEPs’ roles: the type of electoral system, popular opinion on EU issues, whether their party is in government, the party’s ideological heritage, and if the party organizes more advanced coordination mechanisms. The main result is that the working assumption that MEPs are influenced by characteristics in the national arena is shown to be largely correct. That is, some of the identified aspects of the national political context do influence how the MEPs understand their roles. For example, the character of the electoral system influences attitudes among the MEPs. However, that relationship is not as simple and straightforward as much of the literature suggests. Rather, the results in this study suggest that the most important aspect of the relationship between the national level and the MEPs is whether parties or others (such as national parliamentarians) actively engage in the work of the MEPs. It matters how parties design the relationship between the levels, especially for how and where MEPs direct their main attention, but also in terms of how MEPs vote in the EP. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of further research into how parties facilitate the link between the national and the EU level.

  • 15.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    De politiska partierna och författningen2011In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 113, no 3, p. 271-290Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this article is to study how Sweden’’s political parties handled the processof constitutional review from 2004-2008. In particular the analysis examines howparties choose between their office-seeking, policy-seeking and vote-seeking goalsand the desire to maintain intra party agreement. Three expectations are identified: (a)parties’’ different strategic situations lead them to advocate different long-term goals;(b) different party levels will take different stands in order to increase their influencevis-a-vis other levels; (c) party leaderships will try to increase their freedom to negotiatewith others by avoiding extensive intra party debates or decisions. The study isbased on 30 interviews with representatives closely involved in the constitutional-reformprocess. The conclusion is that parties have self-interested goals as regards thequestion of how the political game should be regulated. The conflict between differentintra-party levels is also obvious. However, due to party members’’ disinterest inthe constitutional review, party leaders did not need to adopt a variety of strategies toavoid a large scale intra-party debate. It was enough for them to claim that the resultingcompromise was actually something of a victory for each party.

  • 16.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Det röda Norrland och det blå Sverige2012In: Ett delat Norrland: på väg mot regioner? / [ed] Lidström, Anders, Umeå: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Umeå universitet , 2012, p. 85-104Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Det sammanflätade landet2004In: Statsvetenskapliga förbundets årsmöte 2004, Stockholm Sverige, 2004Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 18.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    More or less EU: still the fundamental conflict in Sweden2019In: Euroflections: leading academics on the European Elections 2019 / [ed] Niklas Bolin, Kajsa Falasca, Marie Grusell & Lars Nord, Sundsvall: Mittuniversitetet , 2019, p. 42-42Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Partierna och Europeiska unionen2015In: Partier och partisystem / [ed] Magnus Hagevi, Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2015, 1, p. 195-208Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Political parties and the European Union2015In: Research methods in European Union studies / [ed] Lynggaard, Kennet, Manners, Ian & Löfgren, Karl, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, p. 266-280Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The role of political parties in modern democracies is contested. Traditionally, parties have been associated with a number of functions and, especially in a western European context, given a more or less hegemonic role over the political process. However, the question of whether political parties actually have (or should have) this prominent role in modern democracies has long been debated. In this so-called party decline debate, a number of tendencies, such as voter de-alignment and membership decline, are used to indicate the less dominant role of political parties, and it is argued that their adaptive capacity is poor (Webb, 2002: 3). Even though some of the critical remarks regarding the future role of political parties are pertinent, the ambition of this chapter is not to judge in this debate. It is rather written with the assumption that political parties are (still) indispensable parts of representative democracy as we know it, and if political parties fail to integrate the political system, express demands, represent various views and identify political leaders, democracy will lose in the end.

  • 21.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Representative Roles and the Members of the European Parliament: A Comparative Study of Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden2002In: ECPR joint workshop 2002 i Turin, Italien, 2002Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Riksdagen och EU2005In: EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statssskick, Liber, Malmö , 2005, p. 79-102Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    The Selection of Candidates for the European Parliament by National Parties and the Impact of European Political Parties: The Swedish case2009Report (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Tre skäl till att EU-frågorna försvann ur valrörelsen2018In: Snabbtänkt: Reflektioner från valet 2018 av ledande forskare / [ed] Lars Nord, Marie Grusell, Niklas Bolin & Kajsa Falasca, Sundsvall: Mittuniversitetet , 2018, 1, p. 79-79Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 25.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Överstatlig organisering2008In: Jämförande politik, Liber, Malmö , 2008Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Demokratin i det sammanlänkande statsskicket2005In: EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick, Liber, Malmö , 2005, p. 170-179Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Bergman, TorbjörnUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick2005Collection (editor) (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 28.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Larue, Thomas
    La Suède2008In: Les démocraties européennes: Approche comparée des systèmes politiques nationaux, 2008Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Rozenberg, Olivier
    Science Po (Paris).
    Introduction2012In: Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures / [ed] Blomgren, Magnus and Rozenberg, Olivier, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012, p. 1-7Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 30.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Rozenberg, Olivier
    Science Po (Paris).
    Legislative roles and legislative studies: the neo-institutional turning point?2012In: Parliamentary roles in modern legislatures / [ed] Magnus Blomgren, Olivier Rozenberg, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012, p. 8-36Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 31.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Rozenberg, OlivierScience Po (Paris).
    Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures2012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Sahovic, Dzenan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Sandström, Camilla
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Utmaningar och framtida möjligheter2015In: 50 år med Statsvetenskap i Umeå / [ed] Anders Lidström och Gunnel Gustafsson, Umeå: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Umeå universitet , 2015, p. 85-92Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 33.
    Hellström, Johan
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Party debate over Europe in national election campaigns: electoral disunityand party cohesion2016In: European Journal of Political Research, ISSN 0304-4130, E-ISSN 1475-6765, Vol. 55, no 2, p. 265-282Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Few political parties are willing to lead the public debate on how the European Union should develop and parties rarely publicly discuss issues on the EU agenda. This is probably one of the most important democratic problems in the contemporary EU. When and why parties are willing (or not willing) to discuss European cooperation is therefore an essential issue in which political science should engage. Previous research has shown that parties that are internally divided on EU issues downplay these issues in order to avoid internal disputes. At the same time, parties that have severe intraparty conflicts over the issue are unable to contain the debate. Thus, parties that are unified in their position on EU issues and parties that are heavily split speak about the EU, but others do not. Also, earlier research has shown that political parties downplay issues in response to internal divisions among their supporters. It is argued in this article that the focus should not be solely on intraparty conflict or whether or not a party's voters are hesitant or disunited, but rather on how these factors interact in order to better understand how parties act strategically regarding EU issues. Using a new dataset that relies on quantitative content analysis of quality newspapers during the national election campaigns in the period 1983–2010 in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Sweden, it is found that parties that have a high degree of internal dissent on European issues, while at the same time having an equally divided electorate, are the parties that are most present in the public debate. Hence, it is the interaction between these two important factors that explains much of the variation in the amount of attention paid to European issues in national election campaigns.

  • 34. Liljeqvist, Nina
    et al.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Riksdagspartierna och EU: en svag demokratisk länk2018Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I denna analys granskas de svenska riksdagspartiernas förmåga att skapa en folklig förankring för den förda EU-politiken. För detta syfte kartläggs först EG-/EU-rättens betydelse i svensk lagstiftning. Utvecklingen över tid såväl som över politikområden jämförs. Förekomsten av EG-/EU-regler i svensk lagstiftning ökar tydligt från och med början på 1990-talet, och skillnaderna mellan olika politikområden är dessutom stora och växande. Vissa områden, såsom jordbruk, miljö och handelsfrågor, har blivit starkt påverkade av EG-/EU-rätten, medan exempelvis kultur och skola inte har det. Detta bör påverka hur partierna arbetar med olika områden i och utanför riksdagen. Därefter undersöks i vad mån riksdagspartierna i sina nationella valmanifest lyfter fram frågor som relaterar till EU. EU-dimensionen börjar nämnas i allt högre utsträckning i samband med folkomröstningen om svenskt EU-medlemskap 1994, men därefter tillägnas EU allt mindre utrymme. Avslutningsvis studeras EU:s påverkan på den interna partipolitiska arenan. Även på denna punkt förblir partier tämligen passiva inför den politiska verklighet som EU-medlemskapet bjuder. Den sammantagna analysen pekar således på att partierna i flera avseenden brister i sin grundläggande funktion att utgöra en länk mellan medborgaren och de politiska beslutsfattarna. Slutligen framhålls några åtgärder som skulle kunna förbättra denna situation

  • 35. Maier, Jürgen
    et al.
    Faas, Thorsten
    Rittberger, Berthold
    Fortin-Rittberger, Jessica
    Josifides, Kalliope Agapiou
    Banducci, Susan
    Bellucci, Paolo
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Brikse, Inta
    Chwedczuk-Szulc, Karol
    Lobo, Marina Costa
    Cześnik, Mikołaj
    Deligiaouri, Anastasia
    Deželan, Tomaž
    deNooy, Wouter
    Virgilio, Aldo Di
    Fesnic, Florin
    Fink-Hafner, Danica
    Grbeša, Marijana
    Greab, Carmen
    Henjak, Andrija
    Hopmann, David Nicolas
    Johann, David
    Jelenfi, Gábor
    Kavaliauskaite, Jurate
    Kmetty, Zoltan
    Kritzinger, Sylvia
    Magalhães,, Pedro C.
    Meyer, Vincent
    Mihailova, Katia
    Mirchev, Mihail
    Pitkänen, Ville
    Ramonaite, Aine
    Reidy, Theresa
    Rybar, Marek
    Sammut, Carmen
    Santana-Pereira, José
    Spurava, Guna
    Spyridou, Lia-Paschalla
    Stefanel, Adriana
    Štětka,, Václav
    Surdej, Aleksander
    Tardos, Róbert
    Trimithiotis, Dimitris
    Vezzoni, Christiano
    Világi, Aneta
    Zavecz, Gergo
    This time it's different?: Effects of the Eurovision Debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy - evidence from a quasi-experiment in 24 countries2018In: Journal of European Public Policy, ISSN 1350-1763, E-ISSN 1466-4429, Vol. 25, no 4, p. 606-629Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    For the very first time in EU history, the 2014 EP elections provided citizens with the opportunity to influence the nomination of the Commission President by casting a vote for the main Europarties’ ‘lead candidates’. By subjecting the position of the Commission President to an open political contest, many experts have formulated the expectation that heightened political competition would strengthen the weak electoral connection between EU citizens and EU legislators, which some consider a root cause for the EU’s lack of public support. In particular, this contest was on display in the so-called ‘Eurovision Debate’, a televised debate between the main contenders for the Commission President broadcasted live across Europe. Drawing on a quasi-experimental study conducted in 24 EU countries, we find that debate exposure led to increased cognitive and political involvement and EU support among young citizens. Unfortunately, the debate has only reached a very small audience.

  • 36.
    Rozenberg, Olivier
    et al.
    Science Po (Paris).
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Bringing Parliamentary Roles Back In2012In: Parliamentary roles in modern legislatures / [ed] Magnus Blomgren, Olivier Rozenberg, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012, p. 211-230Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 37.
    Sandström, Camilla
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Europaparlamentet2005In: EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick / [ed] Magnus Blomgren, Torbjörn Bergman, Stockholm: Liber , 2005, p. 126-149Chapter in book (Refereed)
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf