umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 17 av 17
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Eckerberg, Katarina
    et al.
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Nilsson, Måns
    Gerger-Swartling, Åsa
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Institutional analysis of energy and agriculture2007Ingår i: Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning / [ed] Måns Nilsson och Katarina Eckerberg, London: Earthscan , 2007, s. 111-136Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
  • 2. Nilsson, Måns
    et al.
    Eckerberg, Katarina
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Hagberg, Lovisa
    Gerger Swartling, Åsa
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Policy framing and EPI in energy and agriculture2007Ingår i: Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning / [ed] Måns Nilsson and Katarina Eckerberg, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2007, s. 85-110Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
  • 3.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Statsvetenskap.
    Environmental Policy in the European Union: Actors, Institutions and Processes (by Andrew Jordan, ed.)2006Ingår i: Environmental Politics, Vol. 15, nr 3, s. 507-508Artikel, recension (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 4.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Environmental policy integration in bioenergy: policy learning across sectors and levels?2011Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    A central principle within UN and EU policy is environmental policyintegration (EPI), aiming at integrating environmental aspirations, targetsand requirements into sector policy in order to promote sustainabledevelopment. The focus of this study is EPI in bioenergy policy. Bioenergy isa renewable energy source of increasing importance in the EU and Swedishenergy mix. At the same time, it is debated how environmentally friendlybioenergy really is. Furthermore, bioenergy can be considered both a multisectorand a multi-level case, since bioenergy is produced in many differentsectors and bioenergy policy is formulated and implemented on differentlevels. Therefore, EPI in bioenergy policy is here analysed over time in twosectors (energy and agriculture) and on three levels (EU, national, subnational).A cognitive, policy learning perspective on EPI is adopted, tracingEPI through looking for reframing of policy towards incorporatingenvironmental objectives in policy rhetoric and practice. Furthermore,institutional and political explanations for the development are discussed.Paper I analyses EPI in Swedish bioenergy policy within energy andagriculture. Paper II analyses institutional conditions for multi-sector EPI inSwedish bioenergy policy. Paper III analyses EPI in EU bioenergy policywithin energy and agriculture. Paper IV analyses sub-national EPI in thecase of the Biofuel Region in north Sweden. The material examined consistsof policy documents complemented by semi-structured interviews.

    Together, the four papers provide a more complex and holistic picture ofthe EPI process than in previous research, which mainly has focused onstudying EPI in single sectors and on single levels. The study shows thatpriorities are different on different levels; that EPI has varied over time; butthat EPI today is detectable within bioenergy policy in both studied sectorsand on all levels. Policy learning in bioenergy is found to be mainly a topdownprocess. Furthermore, policy coherence between sectors and levels;long-term goals; and concrete policy instruments are found to be importantboth for the EPI process as such and for the outcomes from this process.However, when attempting to marry different goals, such as growth, securityand sustainability, in line with the three-tiered (economic, social, ecologic)sustainable development concept, environmental aspects risks not to beprioritised when goal conflicts arise. The study proposes that future researchboth continues the analysis of multi-sector and multi-level EPI, and furtherexplores to what extent ecological sustainability is improved by EPI.

  • 5.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Statsvetenskap.
    EPI in European Bioenergy Policy: a Multi-Level Governance Perspective2008Ingår i: Klimat- och energipolitik, 2008Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 6.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Statsvetenskap.
    EPI in European bioenergy policy: a multi-level governance perspective2008Rapport (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
    Abstract [en]

    Given the planned bioenergy expansion within the EU, this paper explores EPI in EU bioenergy policy with a multi-level governance perspective. The paper explores how EU bioenergy policy is framed; to what extent do environmental considerations underpin policy decisions and to what extent are other factors such as supply security or cost-efficiency emphasised? Secondly, given that implementation of bioenergy policy within the EU depends on a multilevel governance (MLG) system, the paper also explores the implications of EU bioenergy policies for Member State’s ability to promote EPI in bioenergy development. To this aim, the relation between European bioenergy policy and Swedish bioenergy policy is discussed. To what extent is the EU’s framing of bioenergy parallel to the Swedish framing of the issue? And, in what way does this frame compliance/frame clash shape the prospects to promote EPI in Swedish bioenergy policy? Furthermore, the paper analyses to what extent renewable energy goals are integrated into the EU:s common agricultural policy (CAP). In explicit, it explores the question; does CAP contain measures to increase the supply of biomass from agriculture? And, if bioenergy is addressed within CAP, in what way is the issue framed within the agricultural sector? Are there differences between the energy sector and agricultural sector in this sense? The paper draws some tentative conclusions on the development of EPI and policy coordination in EU bioenergy policy and on the implications of EU policy for EPI in Swedish bioenergy policy and provides thought for future research.

  • 7.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policyintegration in Swedish bioenergy policy2011Ingår i: Environmental Politics, ISSN 0964-4016, E-ISSN 1743-8934, Vol. 20, nr 4, s. 528-546Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    What institutional conditions seem relevant for multi-sector EPI, and itsoutcomes? Analysing the Swedish bioenergy policy process, which represents apositive case of multi-sector EPI, this article argues that open actor access, useof environmental knowledge, monitoring mechanisms, and both environmentsectoraland inter-sectoral policy coordination are conducive for multi-sectorEPI, which is also affected by external events. For achieving outcomes frommulti-sector EPI, monitoring mechanisms as well as inter-sectoral policycoordination are important.

  • 8.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Statsvetenskap.
    Institutions and the Environment (by Arild Vatn)2007Ingår i: Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, s. 161-162Artikel, recension (Refereegranskat)
  • 9.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Integrating Environment in European Bioenergy: Policy Learning in Multiple Sectors2009Ingår i: Working Group 7: (Contested) knowledges and learning in environmental policy processes, 2009Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 10.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Integrating environment into European bioenergy policy: comparing the energy and agricultural sectorsManuskript (preprint) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Environmental policy integration (EPI) has long been a key part of EU environmental work. Recognising that some policy fields involve a multi-sector perspective, this article focuses on EPI in EU bioenergy policy, more specifically how bioenergy has been framed within EU energy policy and agricultural policy from 1995 to 2009. Three questions are posed. First, is there EPI in EU bioenergy policy? Second, is EU bioenergy policy coherent across sectors? Third, to what extent has EPI occurred? The analysis shows that EPI in EU bioenergy policy has increased over time, and that this has stimulated policy coherency between sectors. Climate change is the focal environmental issue in bioenergy policy, although the focus has broadened recently, and the environment is placed on a par with other issues, rather than prioritised. Future research needs to analyse post-Lisbon Treaty EPI, multi-sector EPI, and explore which environmental aspects are integrated (and which are not?).

  • 11.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    'Much ado about nothing?' - energy forest cultivation in Sweden: how intersectoral policy coordination affects outcomes from EPI in multisectoral issues2008Ingår i: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, ISSN 1523-908X, E-ISSN 1522-7200, Vol. 10, nr 4, s. 381-403Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The integration of environmental issues into sectoral policies is also known asenvironmental policy integration (EPI), a concept that can be described as a process oflearning across frames. The article examines the role of intersectoral policy coordinationfor the outcomes from EPI in multisectoral issues. Through the application of thematicidea analysis, it explores the development of EPI in Swedish policies regarding agriculturalbioenergy production—energy and agricultural policy—with specific focus on energyforest cultivation. Policies in both the sectors are then compared in a discussion of whatrole intersectoral policy coordination plays for the outcomes from EPI in multisectoralissues, exemplified by Swedish energy forest cultivation.

  • 12.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Much ado about nothing?: energy forest cultivation in Sweden: on policy coordination and EPI in a multisectoral issue2005Ingår i: The Politics of Renewables', Panel 19-4, European Consortium for Political Research: 3rd General Conference, Environmental Politics Section, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8-10 september 2005, 2005Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

     The integration of environmental issues into sectoral policies is also known as environmental policy integration (EPI), a concept that can be described as a process of learning across frames. The article examines the role of policy coordination in achieving sustainable outcomes as a result from EPI in a multisectoral issue. Through the application of thematic idea analysis, it explores the development of vertical EPI in Swedish policies regarding agricultural bioenergy production – energy and agricultural policy – with specific focus on energy forest cultivation. The policies in the two sectors are then compared in a discussion of the role of policy coordination for the achievement of sustainable outcomes from EPI, with regards to energy forest cultivation.

  • 13.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Statsvetenskap.
    Multi-level Environmental Policy Integration in Bioenergy: Avhandlings-PM2006Ingår i: Arbetsgrupp Politologisk Metodologi, 2006Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 14.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Sub-national environmental policy integration in Biofuel Region: learning across scales?2009Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 15.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Sub-national environmental policy integration: learning across levels?Ingår i: Local Environment: the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, ISSN 1354-9839, E-ISSN 1469-6711Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Environmental policy integration, EPI, refers to the integration of environmental aspects and policy objectivesinto non‐environmental sector policies. EPI can be viewed as an environmental learning process, but whathappens when EPI is to travel across political levels? This article explores EPI in a previously neglected policyarena; the sub‐national level, where Biofuel Region (BFR) in the north Swedish counties Västerbotten andVästernorrland is studied in depth. According to previous studies, an environmental perspective is integratedinto bioenergy policy on the EU level and Swedish level, but is an environmental perspective present also onthe sub‐national level, within BFR? Furthermore, can the development in BFR be explained by cross‐levellearning? In a discussion of the impact of EU and Swedish bioenergy policy on the sub‐national bioenergydevelopment, the concluding discussion revolves around the overarching question of this study: what are thesub‐national implications of higher‐level EPI in a policy area?

  • 16.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    The fight over food: producers, consumers, and activists challenge the global food system (ed. by Wynne Wright and Gerald Middendorf, ISBN 978-0-271-03274-0)2009Ingår i: Environmental Politics, ISSN 0964-4016, E-ISSN 1743-8934, Vol. 18, nr 4, s. 650-651Artikel, recension (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 17.
    Söderberg, Charlotta
    et al.
    Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle, avdelning samhällsvetenskap.
    Eckerberg, Katarina
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Rising policy conflicts in Europe over bioenergy and forestry2013Ingår i: Forest Policy and Economics, ISSN 1389-9341, E-ISSN 1872-7050, Vol. 33, s. 112-119Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Growing concerns over emissions of green-house gases causing climate change as well as energy security concerns have spurred the interest in bioenergy production pushed by EU targets to fulfil the goal of 20 per cent renewable energy in 2020, as well as the goal of 10 per cent renewable fuels in transport by 2020. Increased bioenergy production is also seen to have political and economic benefits for rural areas and farming regions in Europe and in the developing world. There are, however, conflicting views on the potential benefits of large scale bioenergy production, and recent debates have also drawn attention to a range of environmental and socio-economic issues that may arise in this respect. One of these challenges will be that of accommodating forest uses – including wood for energy, and resulting intensification of forest management – with biodiversity protection in order to meet EU policy goals. We note that the use of biomass and biofuels spans over several economic sector policy areas, which calls for assessing and integrating environmental concerns across forest, agriculture, energy and transport sectors.In this paper, we employ frame analysis to identify the arguments for promoting bioenergy and assess the potential policy conflicts in the relevant sectors, through the analytical lens of environmental policy integration. We conclude that while there is considerable leverage of environmental arguments in favour of bioenergy in the studied economic sectors, and potential synergies with other policy goals, environmental interest groups remain sceptical to just how bioenergy is currently being promoted. There is a highly polarised debate particularly relating to biofuel production. Based on our analysis, we discuss the potential for how those issues could be reconciled drawing on the frame conflict theory, distinguishing between policy disagreements and policy controversies.

1 - 17 av 17
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf