umu.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 63
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the 'Create feeds' function.
  • 1.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Ingmanson, Staffan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Grundläggande EU-rätt2015 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Boken är uppdelad i tre delar: Den första delen beskriver EU och EU-rätten, vad som kännetecknar EU:s rättsordning och hur unionsrätten förhåller sig till nationell rätt. Den andra delen förklarar målen för EU:s verksamhet och hur de ska uppnås. Den tredje delen behandlar EU-rätten från skrift till verklighet, det vill säga de rättsliga mekanismer och processer som garanterar EU-rättens genomslag.På ett tydligt och pedagogiskt sätt beskrivs EU-rättens innehåll, logik och systematik. Såväl individuella rättsregler som de institutioner som utvecklar och verkställer dessa regler behandlas.Grundläggande EU-rätt är i första hand tänkt att användas som en introduktion till EU-rätten på universitets- och högskoleutbildningar. Den vänder sig också till personer som i sitt arbete behöver grundläggande kunskaper i ämnet.

  • 2.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bosman: A Legacy Beyond Sports2016In: The Legacy of Bosman, Revisiting the relationship between EU law and sport / [ed] Duval, Antoine & Van Rompuy, Ben, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016, 31-49 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The 1995 Bosman case from the CJEU is one of the most famous judgments ever delivered by the Luxembourg court. It is well-known in sport- ing contexts, but this article takes the discussion beyond that area, demonstrating Bosman’s importance in other areas of law by using network analysis. This illus- trates that Bosman is an exceptional case, both in its own right and as a source of further cases, citing Bosman directly or indirectly. We also demonstrate that Bosman is primarily cited for four reasons: the jurisdiction of the CJEU in mat- ters of preliminary rulings, the use of the fundamental freedoms against private entities, non-discriminatory obstacles on the internal market and the temporal effects of CJEU judgments. However, when analyzed further it becomes clear that the Bosman case contains few truly original contributions to EU law and largely builds on existing case law to draw important conclusions. Thus, the Court must have other reasons for citing Bosman. Given the characteristics of the case many such reasons are plausible. Bosman is well-written, well-reasoned, well-known and well-connected, making it an excellent source to use in future cases. 

  • 3.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bosman som spindeln i nätet: Bosmans betydelse bortom idrott2016In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, Vol. 19, no 4, 685-702 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Cases and materials on EU law2007Book (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions2015In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, E-ISSN 2071-8322, Vol. 16, no 5, 1073-1098 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is one of the most important sources of European Union law. However, case law’s role in EU law is not uniform. By empirically studying how the Court uses its own case law as a source of law, we explore the correlation between, on the one hand, the characteristics of a CJEU case— type of action, actors involved, and area of law—and, on the other hand, the judgment’s “embeddedness” in previous case law and value as a precedent in subsequent cases. Using this approach, we test, confirm, and debunk existing scholarship concerning the role of CJEU case law as a source of EU law. We offer the following conclusions: that CJEU case law cannot be treated as a single entity; that only a limited number of factors reliably affect a judgment’s persuasive or precedential power; that the Court’s use of its own case law as a source of law is particularly limited in successful infringement proceedings; that case law is particularly important in preliminary references—especially those concerning fundamental freedoms and competition law; and that initiating Member State and the number of observations affects the behavior of the Court. 

  • 6.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Direktivs verkan före genomförandefristens utgång: preliminär, begränsad eller fullständig indirekt effekt?2007In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 1, 83-112 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    EG & EU-fördragen: EC & EU Treaties2007 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Europeiska unionens fördrag2009 (ed. 3)Book (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    EU-rättens framtid som rättsvetenskaplig disciplin: början på slutet eller slutet på början?2017In: Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år / [ed] Örjan Edström, Johan Lindholm, Ruth Mannelqvist, Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2017, 79-88 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Festskrift till Pär Hallström: Volume in Honor of Pär Hallström2012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Fra.bo, en viktig bit i pusslet om de grundläggande friheternas horisontella verkan2012In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, Vol. 15, no 4, 707-721 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Från Champagne till Ramlösa: EU-domstolens rättspraxis i svenska underinstanser2017In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, Vol. 4, 695-716 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Goodbye van Gend en Loos, Hello Bosman?: Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments2014In: European Law Journal, ISSN 1351-5993, E-ISSN 1468-0386, Vol. 20, no 5, 667-687 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    It is generally agreed that some judgments by the Court of Justice are more important than others, but the ability of traditional legal methods to identify such judgments is inherently limited. In this article, we apply various tools developed in network analysis to identify which judgments are the most important as legal precedents. The study reveals that certain well-known judgments, like van Gend en Loos, have limited importance as precedents, while other judgments, like BosmanPreussenElektra and Schumacker, are likely overlooked.

  • 14.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Introduction: Europarättsdagarna 20152016In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, Vol. 19, no 4, 667-668 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Is it good law?: network analysis and the CJEU's internal market jurisprudence2017In: Journal of international economic law (Oxford), ISSN 1369-3034, E-ISSN 1464-3758, Vol. 20, no 2, 257-277 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    An increasing number of legal scholars have been attracted to using network analysis, particularly by the possibility of conducting large-scale studies of case law. In this article, we discuss how network analysis can provide new and important information about the law governing the European Union’s internal market by making possible the study of the entire jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), including changes over time. We apply different network centrality measurements to key CJEU internal market decisions and compare how accurately they capture the precedential and persuasive power of case law. In so doing, we reach conclusions that can be used to better understand not only the law of the internal market, but also the law of any case law-driven jurisdiction such as WTO dispute settlement or investor–state arbitration.

  • 16.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Judiciell aktivism eller prejudikatbildning?: en empirisk granskning av Högsta domstolen2016In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 2, 143-158 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Ett antal kommentatorer har hävdat att Högsta domstolen under senare år intagit en ny, friare roll i förhållande till lagstiftaren. Debatten har framförallt kommit att gälla ett antal enskilda och kontroversiella domar som enligt vissa debattörer kan beskrivas som ”judiciell aktivism”. Mot bakgrund av denna debatt och utifrån ett omfattande empiriskt material studerar vi hur Högsta domstolens verksamhet utvecklats över tid. Studien bekräftar att Högsta domstolen genomgått en omfattande förändring, men att det handlar om att domstolen under längre tid utvecklats till en tydligare och aktivare prejudikatinstans, snarare än ett plötsligt utslag av judiciell aktivism.

  • 17.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Mickelsson: två män på vattenskoter vänder upp-och-ner på fri rörlighet för varor2009In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, Vol. 94, no 10, 1072-1086 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    EG-domstolen avkunnade nyligen dom i Mickelsson, ett mål som gällde begränsningar av bruket av vattenskotrar i svenska vatten. Domen i Mickelsson belyser en föga diskuterad dimension av den redan komplicerade frågan om hur principen om fri rörlighet ska tillämpas och, närmare bestämt, vad som utgör en sådan åtgärd med motsvarande verkan som en kvantitativ restriktion (ÅMV) vilken är förbjuden enligt artikel 28 EG. Brukanderegler av det slag som behandlades i Mickelsson passar inte den traditionella uppdelningen i produktregler och försäljningsåtgärder som EG-domstolen etablerade i Keck. Denna artikel undersöker EG-domstolens praxis kring brukanderegler med utgångspunkt i Mickelsson och det relaterade målet mellankommissionen och Italien. Dessa domar klargör hur brukandereglers förenlighetmed artikel 28 EG ska bedömas. Genom domarna har dock EG-domstolen även tagit ett viktigt steg mot en förenklad tillämpning av artikel 28 i allmänhet.

  • 18.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Not enough room for optimal choices?: The European legal framework for green taxes2011In: Green taxation in East Asia / [ed] Richard Cullen, Jefferson VanderWolk and Yan Xu, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, 167-208 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 19.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Peek-A-Boo, It’s a Case Law System!: Comparing the European Court of Justice and the United States Supreme Court from a Network Perspective2017In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, E-ISSN 2071-8322, Vol. 18, no 3, 647-686 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have had an immense impact on development of European Union law, and this has raised a critical discussion about how the CJEU establishes and uses case law. Through a comparison with the United States Supreme Court (USSC) and network analysis, this article argues that much of the criticism is based on false expectations as to the nature of the CJEU. We argue that the Court of Justice must be understood as a precedent-driven constitutional court and that, if we take that as our starting point, its approach to case law is quite reasonable.

  • 20.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Three Ideas: The Scope of EU Law Protecting Against Discrimination2012In: Festskrift till Pär Hallström: Volume in honor of Pär Hallström / [ed] Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2012, 77-100 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The issue of when EU law applies, its scope, is obviously important and yet it has no clear answer. Two extreme positions are that EU law has a general scope, which it does not, and that all EU law provisions have different scopes, which clarifies nothing. This article explores the middle ground by seeking to identify underlying ideas capable of explaining when different EU law provisions apply on the national level and why seemingly similar provisions differ in scope. The article studies under what conditions an individual seeking protection against discrimination can invoke EU law on the national level and concludes that EU law provisions preventing discrimination differ greatly in scope but that such differences can be explained by the fact that they are based on different ideas: the idea of the internal market, the idea of actor equivalence, or the idea of a Europe without borders.

  • 21.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Markus, Naarttijärvi
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Konstitutionell rätt2016 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    I en tid då skyddet för grundläggande rättigheter och värnet mot otillbörlig maktutövning blir allt mer aktuellt är den konstitutionella rättens betydelse för rättssystemet och rättsstaten påtaglig. De gränser som den konstitutionella rätten ställer upp för utövandet av offentlig makt ökar således i betydelse, men samtidigt blir det konstitutionellrättsliga läget allt mer komplext, inte minst på grund av europarättens inflytande.Konstitutionell rätt behandlar den konstitutionella rättens tre centrala teman:Maktdelning och andra förutsättningar för utövande av offentlig makt, skyddet för grundläggande rättigheter samt rättsligt genomdrivande av konstitutionellrättsliga normer. Utifrån dessa tre teman behandlar författarna konstitutionella bestämmelser med ursprung i svensk nationell rätt, EU-rätten och Europakonventionen om mänskliga rättigheter.Boken är anpassad för att kunna användas som lärobok på juristutbildningen, men riktar sig också till en bredare publik. Konstitutionell rätt är relevant läsning för såväl erfarna jurister som läsare som är intresserade av konstitutionella frågor mer allmänt.

  • 22.
    Derlén, Mattias
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Rosvall, Martin
    Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Physics.
    Mirshahvalad, Atieh
    Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Physics.
    Coherence out of chaos: mapping European union law by running randomly through the maze of CJEU case law2013In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 3, 517-535 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [no]

    Recent research has demonstrated the ability of network analysis to better understand law. In this study we apply network analysis to the case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) in order understand its role as a source of law. In doing so, we apply network analysis tools not previously used in legal scholarship, most significantly (i) a modified version of the PageRank algorithm, (ii) the Map Equation, and (iii) resampling to infer “missing” links. In the article we demonstrate that this method can help us to understand not only the CJEU’s case law but law generally.

  • 23.
    Edström, Örjan
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, JohanUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.Mannelqvist, RuthUmeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år2017Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet bildades år 1977. Med anledning av 40-årsfirandet presenteras i denna jubileumsskrift 20 bidrag skrivna av 33 forskare och lärare verksamma vid institutionen. Både juristprogrammet och den forskning som bedrivs vid institutionen har med tiden blivit fast etablerade som en del av de svenska universiteten. Forskningen har i takt med internationaliseringen utvecklats och många forskare är etablerade både på nationell och internationell nivå. De olika bidragen speglar undervisning och forskning vid institutionen. De handlar såväl om juristprogrammets etablering och utveckling som olika aktuella projekt och forskningsområden som utvecklats vid institutionen.

  • 24.
    Kaburakis, Anastasios
    et al.
    Saint Louis University.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Rodenberg, Ryan
    Florida State University.
    British Pubs, Decoder Cards, and the Future of Intellectual Property Licensing after Murphy2012In: The Columbia journal of European law, ISSN 1076-6715, Vol. 18, no 2, 307-322 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 25.
    Larsson, Olof
    et al.
    University of Gothenburg.
    Naurin, Daniel
    University of Oslo.
    Derlén, Mattias
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Speaking law to power: the strategic use of precedent of the court of justice of the European Union2017In: Comparative Political Studies, ISSN 0010-4140, E-ISSN 1552-3829, Vol. 50, no 7, 879-907 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    We argue that courts may increase their autonomy and effectiveness by persuading governmental actors, who have powers over the societal impact of judicial decisions, of the legal quality of their rulings. This view combines a strategic perspective on judicial decision making with a conception of persuasion that allows courts to widen their zone of discretion. We support our argument with data from the European Union, where we find that the Court of Justice improves its legal justifications—by embedding its decisions in case law—when it faces a more adverse political environment. Our findings suggest both that the limits of judicial independence are set largely by political preferences, and that legal rhetoric may be an opportunity for courts to extend their room for maneuver. They also indicate that political audiences may indirectly influence the development of case law, by triggering courts to engage in precedent. 

  • 26.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Alla idrottsliga regler måste vara förenliga med EG-rätten - EG-domstolen begränsar idrottens rättsliga särställning2008In: Svensk Idrottsforskning: Organ för Centrum för Idrottsforskning, ISSN 1103-4629, no 2, 34-34 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Artikel 165 FEUF - ett genombrott i EU-rättens förhållande till idrotten?2011In: Artikelsamling. 2011: svensk idrottsjuridisk förening / [ed] Krister Malmsten, Stockholm: SISU Idrottsböcker , 2011, 160-175 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 28.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Bara vara vänner?: Bilsportmålets betydelse för bredd- och elitidrott2012In: Svensk Idrottsjuridisk Förening artikelsamling, Vol. 17, 105-114 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 29.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Can I Please Have a Slice of Ronaldo?: The Legality of FIFA's ban on Third-Party Ownership under European Union Law2016In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 15, no 3-4, 137-148 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Trading football players is a massive, global business where several single trades have brought in more than $100 million in transfer fees. This has brought about a business practice where third-party investors provide or receive a share of the transfer fees, so-called third-party ownership. However, effective May 1, 2015, FIFA has imposed a worldwide ban on this practice. In the face of already-initiated legal challenges, this article considers whether the ban is compatible with European Union law. It finds that the ban violates both free movement rights and competition law and that FIFA would be well-served to consider a less restrictive measure.

  • 30.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Case C-325/08, Olympique Lyonnais SASP v. Olivier Bernard and Newcastle United UFC, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 20102010In: Common market law review, ISSN 0165-0750, E-ISSN 0588-7453, Vol. 47, no 4, 1187-1197 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 31.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    'DCFR, please meet national procedure':  enforcing the frame of reference using national procedural law2011In: The Foundations of European Private Law / [ed] Roger Brownsword, Hans-W Micklitz, Leone Niglia, Stephen Weatherill, Oxford: Hart Publishing , 2011, 465-486 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Det europeiska småmålsförfarandet - en liten början till något stort?2008In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 10, 848-866 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Småmålsförordningen, som träder i kraft den 1 januari 2009, innebär att EG-rätten på ett mer genomgripande sätt än tidigare påverkar nationell processrätt. Det europeiska småmålsförfarandet innehåller ett flertal nya regler som kan ersätta reglerna i rättegångsbalken i tvistemål av gränsöverskridande karaktär. I artikeln presenteras de ur ett svenskt perspektiv centrala aspekterna av småmålsförordningen.

  • 33.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Does Legislating Against Doping in Sports Make Sense? Comparing Sweden and the U.S. Suggests Not2013In: Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, ISSN 1556-9799, Vol. 13, no 1, 21-34 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Both policy makers and sport stakeholders have fought against doping since the 1960’s but largely separately from each other. In light of recent events, political discussion, and academic debate, this article considers the expediency of using legislation to fight doping in sports. Building upon and comparing experiences in the U.S. and in Sweden, this article concludes that increased governmental involvement is undesirable from both the policy makers’ and the sport stakeholders’ perspectives. The reasons for this conclusion are, primarily, (i) that they are driven by different aims, (ii) that they differ in what they consider doping, (iii) that policy makers may push rules in sports in an unwanted direction, (iv) that expanded government involvement increases the likelihood of fundamental rights challenges to sport rules, and (v) that there are alternative ways of enhancing existing rules’ efficiency.

  • 34.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Dopad i praktiken - rättslig och idrottslig praxis2009In: Idrottsjuridisk skriftserie, ISSN 1403-8781, no 14, 85-102 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Idrottsrörelsen bedriver en omfattande, internationell kamp mot doping. I Sverige, till skillnad från i många andra länder, kan många idrottsliga dopingförseelser också utgöra brott i straffrättslig bemärkelse. En undersökning av vilka dopingärenden som prövas i de idrottsliga och rättsliga systemen visar att dessa system överlappar varandra i viss mån men att det också finns tydliga skillnader mellan vilka som fastnar i respektive system.

  • 35.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Doping – idrottsligt fusk eller rättslig angelägenhet?2013 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    En jämnare spelplan: en EU-rättslig analys av idrottsliga lönetak2011In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 4, 685-704 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 37.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Från Bryssel till Bryssel. Samma lag, ny lagstiftare - nya perspektiv?2009In: Lagstiftning i teori och praktik: Rapport från 2009 års forskningsinternat / [ed] Görel Granström och Mattias Hjertstedt, 2009, 65-77 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 38.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Law.
    Harmonisering av processrätten - utvecklingslinjer2007In: Svensk rätt i EU: en antologi, Iustus, Uppsala , 2007, 151ff- p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 39.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Idrotten behöver bättre skydd för tv-rättigheter2014In: Svensk Idrottsforskning: Organ för Centrum för Idrottsforskning, ISSN 1103-4629, no 2, 14-17 p.Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 40.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Idrottens förrättsligande: varför är doping speciellt?2011In: Förrättsligande: rapport från 2011 års forskningsinternat / [ed] Görel Granström, Umeå: Juridiska institutionen, Umeå universitet , 2011, 63-76 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Idrottens rättsliga särart2014In: Idrottsjuridisk skriftserie, ISSN 1403-8781, Vol. 19, 131-145 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Artikeln identifierar och utvärderar argument för idrottens rättsliga särart, det vill säga argument för att tillämpa de rättsliga reglernas på idrotten med särskild "ömhet" jämfört med andra samhälleliga företeelser. Idrottens rättsliga särart är en rättslig verklighet, men inte en rättslig princip eller trumfkort som isolerar den idrottsliga verksamheten från rättsreglernas ”normala” tillämpning, utan ett samlingsnamn för de argument som kan anföras för att avvika från rättsreglernas ”normala” tillämpning. 

  • 42.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Idrottens särart och EU:s konkurrensrätt2008In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 4, 914-933 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 43.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Idrottsjuridik2014 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Idrott är sedan länge Sveriges största folkrörelse och det är svårt att hitta någon verksamhet som omfattar en så stor del av samhället som idrotten gör. De rättsliga reglernas påverkan på idrotten har traditionellt sett varit begränsad, men har numera stor och ökande betydelse för den idrottsliga verksamheten.Idrottsjuridik ger en bred, modern och begriplig beskrivning av hur idrottsliga och rättsliga regler förhåller sig till varandra och påverkar idrottsaktörernas rättigheter och skyldigheter. Boken behandlar ett stort antal frågor av relevans för såväl amatöridrott som för professionell idrott, däribland frågor om processer i idrottsliga ärenden, avtal, anställningsförhållanden, straffrättsligt ansvar, skadeståndsansvar, sponsorrättigheter, sändningsrättigheter, merchandising, konkurrensrätt, doping och mänskliga rättigheter. Genom sin breda ansats till ämnet kan Idrottsjuridik användas både som en lärobok på högskolenivå och i den idrottsliga praktiken. Boken riktar sig dels till juriststudenter och yrkesverksamma jurister som har goda, allmänna kunskaper i juridik, men som vill förstå hur dessa ska tillämpas på de förhållandevis unika förhållanden som råder inom idrotten, dels till högskolestudenter i idrottsvetenskap, idrottsutövare och idrottsledare som vill lära sig hur de rättsliga reglerna påverkar den idrottsliga verksamheten.

  • 44.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    International Sports Law Journal (2016) 16:3-42017In: International sports law journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 16, no 3-4, 129-130 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Jag lärde mig ingen EU-rätt på högstadiet2015In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 1, 61-63 p.Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 46.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Kommersiell exploatering av idrottslig verksamhet ur ett konkurrensrättsligt perspektiv2015Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The topic of this report is commercial exploitation of sporting activities. This term refers to activities of an economic nature that seek to meet an interest and demand among the public to consume various aspects of the sporting activities in various ways, that is activities that under a broad definition of the term can be described as sports marketing. Commercial exploitation of sporting activities have recently become increasingly common and concerned increasingly larger sums of money. In theory, there are an unlimited number of variants of commercial exploitation of sporting activities, but currently most of these activities fall under one of four main models for the commercial exploitation of sports: ticket sales, media rights, sponsorship, and merchandizing.

    This report examines whether these commercial exploitation models are compatible with competition law based on conditions in Sweden. To start off, it is clear that competition law rules almost by definition applies to commercial exploitation of sporting activities as defined here, regardless if the measures in question are undertaken by sporting actors or external actors.

    A much more difficult question is whether those measures are also contrary to competition law. The overall findings of the report can very briefly be summarized in three conclusions. First, there are obvious competition law problems with many commercial exploitation models that are currently and commonly used, many of which can be linked to the organizational model and the agreements model that dominates most of Swedish sports. Second, on the other hand, most common exploitation models are not as such incompatible with competition law, even if carried out within the existing organizational framework. Third, keeping this in mind, parties that are engaged in commercial exploitation of sporting activities should very carefully consider whether the model that they use meets the requirements posed by competition law.

    Whether a particular commercial exploitation model is compatible with competition law can only be assessed by examining the specific circumstances in the individual case. However, the report notes that from a competition law perspective there are twelve fairly concrete recommendations that should be considered when designing a model for the commercial exploitation of sports:

    1. Sporting actors that sell commercially exploitable rights relating to sporting activities to external actors should as far as possible do so individually and on a as low level as possible and collective sales of such rights should be limitied to situations where this can be justified on objective grounds;

    2. such rights should be sold through open tenders assessed using objective and transparent criteria;

    1. when selling such rights they should to the greatest extent possible be divided into several smaller rights packages and packages of different nature in order to attract as many external actors as possible;

    2. such rights should be sold for short contract periods, preferably three years or less;

    3. the selling of such rights on an exclusive basis should be avoided and should not be done on the basis of national borders;

    4. the external actors who purchase such rights should be allowed, and even required, to sublicense parts of those rights to other external actors if they are unable or unwilling to exploit them;

    5. those external actors should not join together to purchase such rights collectively;

    6. if those external actors join together they should have objective and transparent criteria for participation, be open to as many external actors as possible to participate, and as far as possible allow non-members to sublicense rights;

    7. sports federations and other sporting actors who have a dominant influence over a sport should organizationally separate it regulating the sporting activity as such from it regulating its commercial exploitation;

    8. if such actors regulate issues concerning commercial exploitation of sporting activities, those rules should, under all circumstances when they benefit themselves financially, not be included in provisions that athletes or associations must accept in order to participate in the sport;

    9. if such actors regulate issues concerning commercial exploitation of sporting activities those rules should be neccessary and proportional for achieving an objective aim and not merely be in their own, financial interest, and, finally,

    10. if such actors regulate the commercial exploitation of sporting activities in such a way that they receive part of the revenue, it should also be made clear that they take on a corresponding share of the associated costs or financial risks. 

  • 47.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Konkurrerande och kompletterande dopingregler: Dopad i praktiken2009In: Svensk Idrottsforskning: Organ för Centrum för Idrottsforskning, ISSN 1103-4629, Vol. 18, no 4, 22-25 p.Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Abstract [sv]

    Idrottsrörelsen satsar stora resurser på att beivra doping och varje år genomförs i Sverige ca. 4 000 dopingkontroller men även rättsväsendet bekämpar doping. En undersökning av vilka dopingärenden som prövas i de idrottsliga och rättsliga systemen visar att överlappning av dessa parallella system är relativt liten och att de som straffas för doping kanske är andra än vi vanligen föreställer oss.

  • 48.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Medierättigheter till idrottsvenemang2014In: Ny Juridik, ISSN 1400-3007, no 2, 63-87 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Försäljningen av medierättigheter till idrottsevenemang omsätter betydande belopp, men vad är det egentligen som säljs och vem är det som innehar medierättigheterna? I artikeln utreder Johan Lindholm, docent i rättsvetenskap vid juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, i vilken utsträckning medierättigheter åtnjuter rättsligt skydd, vem som innehar dessa rättigheter och hur konkurrerande anspråk mellan idrottsliga aktörer bör prövas.

  • 49.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    Pechstein: Från Lausanne till Strasbourg2016In: Idrottsjuridisk skriftserie, ISSN 1403-8781, Vol. 21, 105-121 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
    State Procedure and Union Rights: A Comparison of the European Union and the United States2007Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The overarching purpose of this doctoral thesis is to determine if the system of legal mechanisms in European Community law governing what procedural rules national courts shall apply to Community rights can be reformed to better balance involved interests. European Community law is often applied and enforced by ordinary national courts that, as a general rule, supplement substantive Community rules with national procedural rules. While the Community rights that individuals can rely upon before national courts are the same in all Member States, the procedural rules that national courts apply to those Community rights can and often does differ between the Member States. While this order is often acceptable, Community law contains a number of exceptions from the general rule that it is the Member States that decide what procedural rules national courts shall apply to Community rights. Such exceptions are primarily motivated by the need to ensure the effectiveness of Community.

    In order to determine what interests should be taken into account when deciding what procedural rules national courts shall apply to Community rights and how a more balanced system could be constructed, the European legal system is herein compared to that of the United States. American State courts apply Federal law much like national European courts apply European Community law and, also similar to Community law, a system of legal mechanism governing what procedural rules State courts shall apply to Federal rights has developed.

    While U.S. law and European Community law are in this respect similar, the two are not identical. A comparison between the two reveals that the European approach improperly overlooks several interests that are central in the American approach. Most importantly, the European approach emphasizes and promotes the effectiveness of union law at the expense of upholding a proper division of power between union and states. American law also provides European Community law with practical advices regarding how a better balanced approach can be constructed and points to solutions that should be avoided.

12 1 - 50 of 63
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf