umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 4 av 4
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Nygren, Lennart
    et al.
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för socialt arbete.
    White, Sue
    University of Sheffield, Department of Sociological Studies.
    Ellingsen, Ingunn T.
    Universitetet i Stavanger, Institutionen för socialt arbete.
    Investigating welfare regime typologies: Paradoxes, pitfalls and potentialities in comparative social work research2018Ingår i: Social Policy and Society, ISSN 1474-7464, E-ISSN 1475-3073, Vol. 17, nr 4, s. 665-677Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The article reviews the relevance and methodological utility of welfare regime typologies for the study of professional sense-making in social work with families. Focus groups were carried out with social workers in European and Latin American countries representing four different policy regimes. A case vignette was used to elicit social workers’ descriptions of how welfare policy may influence how they understand their work task and the notion of family. The research team identified methodological challenges of general relevance in similar policy-practice studies. There were paradoxes in terms of homogeneity on the regime level vs. heterogeneity within and between national services. Pitfalls appeared in the selection of regime-typical cases, language/cultural barriers, and in deciding organisational level. The article shows that welfare typologies have potentialities in that they may provide a helpful analytical basis for theoretical and practical reasoning in which syntheses between policy and practice can be explored, discussed and challenged.

  • 2. Oltedal, Siv
    et al.
    Nygren, Lennart
    Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för socialt arbete.
    Private and public families: Social workers’ views on children’s and parents’ position in Chile, England, Lithuania and Norway2019Ingår i: Journal of Comparative Social Work, ISSN 0809-9936, E-ISSN 0809-9936, Vol. 14, nr 1, s. 115-140Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Social workers around the world work with families and family complexities in their everyday practice. In this cross-national study, we explore social workers’ family intervention practices related to family definitions and functions, and how social workers balance children’s and parents’ rights and social policies in the proper context. Data derives from focus group interviews with child welfare workers from Norway, Lithuania, Chile and England based on discussions of a common fictitious complex family case (vignette). The four countries chosen for this comparative study are examples of four different welfare systems/regimes. The findings related to this broad area of caring topics are related to how the dimensions of a ‘private’ and a ‘public’ family manifest in social work in the four countries. Social workers in Chile and Lithuania refer to the idea of the private family, while their Norwegian counterparts lean more to the public family. English social workers combine public and private family conceptions in their focus groups, reflecting a system that is partly de-familialized.

  • 3.
    Ellingsen, Ingunn T.
    et al.
    Universitetet i Stavanger.
    Studsröd, Ingunn
    Universitetet i Stavanger.
    Muñoz-Guzmán, Carolina
    Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
    The child, the parents, the family and the state: Chile and Norway compared2019Ingår i: Journal of Comparative Social Work, ISSN 0809-9936, E-ISSN 0809-9936, Vol. 14, nr 1, s. 93-114Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
  • 4.
    Oltedal, Siv
    et al.
    Universitetet i Stavanger.
    Pena, Angela
    University of Havana.
    Hean, Sarah C.P.D.
    Universitetet i Stavanger.
    Work division processes in social work with Cuban and Norwegian families2019Ingår i: Journal of Comparative Social Work, ISSN 0809-9936, E-ISSN 0809-9936, Vol. 14, s. 165-190Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
1 - 4 av 4
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf