Umeå University's logo

Objectives: Fear of falling (FoF) is a common problem among older adults. It can lead to reduced quality of life and less physical activity, which increases fall risk. Earlier work has shown that FoF can be a manifestation of executive dysfunction in adults over 50 years, but studies on people over age 75 years are lacking. Executive functions (EFs) are cognitive functions associated with the frontal lobes and the prefrontal cortex. The aim of this study was to assess associations of EFs and FoF among people aged 80 years or older.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on data from the Northern Sweden Silver-MONICA study and included 434 participants aged 80 years or older. EFs were assessed with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and FoF with the Falls Self-Efficacy Scale–International (FES-I). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine associations among EF, FoF, and a comprehensive set of adjustment factors. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations of FES-I and the subitems of the FAB.

Results: EFs as measured by FAB were inversely associated with FoF (β = -0.23; 95% confidence interval, -0.42 to -0.03; p = 0.021), even after comprehensive adjustments. The FAB subitems measuring lexical fluency, inhibitory control, sustained attention, self-organization, motor programming, and planning also were inversely associated with FoF.

Conclusions: Lower EF is associated with higher FoF among people aged 80 years or older. This information is important for treating and preventing FoF in this population.

Background: Delirium is a common neurological complication after cardiac surgery. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association between hemodynamic fluctuations during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Methods: This post hoc analysis included one-hundred-ninety-five (n = 195) patients aged ≥ 65 years of whom seventy (n = 70) patients developed POD. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables specifically related to the conduct of CPB were digitally recorded at 1-minute intervals. Variables outside the presumed safe boundaries for mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic perfusion flow index– L/min/BSA (QBSA_I), systemic venous oxygen saturation (S_VO₂) and arterial oxygen delivery– ml/min/BSA (DO₂) were defined and analyzed with reference to indices of area under the curve (AUC) and the relative proportion of registrations related to POD. POD was diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria based on a test battery performed preoperatively and repeated twice postoperatively. Statistical tests used to verify observations outside the predefined norm included the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-squared test.

Results: Markers of hemodynamic control during CPB showed significant associations with POD. Both DO₂ (P = 0.02) and QBSA_I (P < 0.001) identified POD patients outside the predefined upper and lower safety limits. S_VO₂ values > 84% (P < 0.001) werealso associated with the development of POD. The number of S_VO₂ registrations below the lower safety limit was negligible, why statistical analysis seemed not useful. No association between MAP and POD registrations was identified.

Conclusions: This study revealed a clear association between markers of hemodynamic control and POD. These associations were most pronounced for DO₂ and QBSA_I. The detected association between high S_VO₂ and POD warrants further insight.

Background: There is limited experience in combining interdisciplinary rehabilitation for persons with dementia and caregiver support.

Aim: To explore how informal caregivers perceive participation in a person-centred, multidimensional, interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme targeting community-dwelling older adults with dementia and their informal caregivers, and how the programme has influenced their everyday life.

Material and Methods: Fourteen informal caregivers, aged 45–84 years, participated in a qualitative interview following a randomised controlled pilot study. Transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: The analysis resulted in seven categories and three themes: feelingchallenged and boostedto face an uncertain future, perceiving supportive activities as sources ofbothjoy and frustration in everyday life and finding relief in recognising their relative’s former self.

Conclusions and Significance: Combining interdisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with dementia with education and support for caregivers was perceived as viable and valuable for the informal caregivers. They felt strengthened by the rehabilitation and better prepared for their uncertain future. However, participation also challenged everyday routines, but the benefits appeared to outweigh the strain.

Background: A team-based, individualised rehabilitation approach may be required to meet the complex needs of people with dementia. This randomised controlled pilot trial evaluated the feasibility of a person-centred multidimensional interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme for community-dwelling older people with dementia and their informal primary caregivers.

Methods: Participants with dementia were randomised to an intervention group (n = 31, mean age (SD) 78.4 (6.0) years) or usual care (n = 30, mean age 79.0 (7.1)). The rehabilitation programme consisted of a 20-week rehabilitation period containing assessments and interventions based on each individual’s goals, and group-based physical exercise plus social interaction twice a week for 16 weeks at a rehabilitation unit. After 5 and 14 months, the interdisciplinary team followed up participants over two four-week periods. For both groups, dates of deaths and decision to move to nursing home over three years, as well as interventions for the relevant periods, were collected. Blinded assessors measured physical functions, physical activity, activities of daily living, cognitive functions, nutritional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms at baseline and at 5, 12, 24, and 36 months.

Results: Participants in the intervention group received a mean of 70.7 (20.1) interventions during the 20-week rehabilitation period, delivered by all ten team professions. The corresponding figures for the control group were 5.8 (5.9). In the intervention group, all but one participated in rehabilitation planning, including goal setting, and attendance in the exercise and social interaction groups was 74.8%. None of the adverse events (n = 19) led to any manifest injury or disease. Cox proportional hazard regression showed a non-significant lower relative risk (HR = 0.620, 95% CI 0.27–1.44) in favour of the intervention for moving to nursing home or mortality during the 36-month follow-up period. Linear mixed-effect models showed non-significant but potentially clinically meaningful between-group differences in gait, physical activity, and neuropsychological symptoms in favour of the intervention.

Conclusions: The rehabilitation programme seems feasible among community-dwelling older people with dementia. The overall results merit proceeding to a future definitive randomised controlled trial, exploring effects and cost-effectiveness. One could consider to conduct the programme earlier in the course of dementia, adding cognitive training and a control attention activity.

Trial registration: The study protocol, ISRCTN59155421, was registered online 4/11/2015.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of having plans for the future among very old people and the factors associated with having such plans. A longitudinal population-based study with home visits for 85-, 90-, and ≥95-year-old participants in Sweden and Finland was used. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards regression models with a maximum 5-year follow-up period were used. The prevalence of having plans for the future was 18.6% (174/936). More men than women and more people living in Sweden than in Finland had plans for the future. In multivariate models, having plans for the future was associated with speaking Swedish, being dentate, and living in the community in the total sample; speaking Swedish and being dentate among women; and speaking Swedish, having a lower Geriatric Depression Scale score, and urban residence among men. Having plans for the future was associated univariately, but not multivariately, with increased survival.

Background: The aim of this study is to explore the prevalence of depressive disorders in very old adults over time, in rural/urban environments, between men/women, as well as to explore other factors associated with depressive disorders.

Methods: This study was conducted utilizing the GERDA-database data, which consists of four cohorts of 85, 90 and 95+ year olds living in Northern Sweden. Participants could reside independently or in residential care. Data collections took place between 2000 and 2017. Descriptive data and logistic regression models were utilized to explore data.

Results: The prevalence of depressive disorders increased between 2000/02 and 2015/17 in all age groups, with the highest percentages observed in the 95+ age group, reaching 53.6 % in 2015/17. The prevalence varied from 20.3 % in those without dementia to 65.1 % in those with dementia. Sex or living in an urban/rural environment was not associated with an increased risk of depression in the fully adjusted models. Dementia and reduced capacity in activities of daily living were associated with depressive disorders among 85 and 90-year-olds, while living alone was associated with depressive disorders in the 95+ age group.

Limitations: Potentially limited generalizability, as this study took place in northern Sweden.

Conclusions: The prevalence of depressive disorders among very old adults increases with age and the prevalence also increases throughout cohorts and time. These alarming rates of depressive disorders among the very old require immediate measures and further investigation. Future studies are needed to explore and monitor trends and to plan and design tailored interventions.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe a population of very old people with heart failure (HF), to analyse the use of cardiovascular drugs over time, and to explore factors influencing cardiovascular drug treatment for this group.

Methods: All participants with information regarding HF diagnosis were selected from the Umeå 85+/Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA). The people in GERDA are all ≥85 years old. Trained investigators performed structured interviews and assessments. Information regarding medications and diagnoses was obtained from the participants and from medical records. Medical diagnoses were reviewed and confirmed by an experienced geriatrician.

Results: In this very old population, the prevalence of HF was 29.6% among women and 30.7% among men. Between 2000 and 2017, there was an increase in the use of renin-angiotensin (RAS) inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.072–1.144) and beta-blockers (BBs) (OR 1.123, 95% CI 1.086–1.161) among persons with HF, whereas the prevalence of loop diuretics (OR 0.899, 95% CI 0.868–0.931) and digitalis (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.828–0.901) decreased (p < 0.001 for all drug classes). Higher age was associated with lower use of RAS inhibitors and BBs.

Conclusion: In this HF population, the use of evidence-based medications for HF increased over time. This may be a sign of better awareness among prescribers regarding the under-prescribing of guidelines-recommended treatment to old people. Higher age associated with a lower prevalence of RAS inhibitors and BBs. This might indicate that further improvement is possible but could also represent a more cautious prescribing among frail very old individuals.

Introduction: Self-rated health (SRH) offers insights into the evolving health demographics of an ageing population.

Aim: To assess change in SRH from old age to very old age and their associations with health and well-being factors, and to investigate the association between SRH and survival.

Methods: All participants in the MONICA 1999 re-examination born before 1940 (n = 1595) were included in the Silver-MONICA baseline cohort. The Silver-MONICA follow-up started in 2016 included participants in the Silver-MONICA baseline cohort aged 80 years or older. Data on SRH was available for 1561 participants at baseline with 446 of them also participating in the follow-up. The follow-up examination included a wide variety of measurements and tests.

Findings: Most participants rated their health as "Quite good" (54.5 %) at baseline. Over the study period, 42.6 % had stable SRH, 40.6 % had declined, and 16.8 % had improved. Changes in SRH were at follow-up significantly associated with age, pain, nutrition, cognition, walking aid use, self-paced gait speed, lower extremity strength, independence in activities of daily living, weekly physical exercise, outdoor activity, participation in organized activities, visiting others, morale, and depressive symptoms. SRH at baseline was significantly associated with survival (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates associations between changes in SRH and a multitude of health- and wellbeing-related factors, as well as a relation between survival and SRH, accentuating their relevance within the ageing population.

Objectives: To investigate the association between gait speed and depressive disorders among very old adults (≥85 years).

Method: This study utilized the GERDA-database, which encompasses a representative sample of those aged 85, 90, and 95+ years residing in northern Sweden and western Finland. From four data collections between 2000 and 2017, this study included 1794 participants. Self-paced gait speed was measured over 2.4-m and depressive disorders was evaluated by a specialist in geriatric medicine according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. T-tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to explore differences and associations between gait speed and depressive disorders.

Results: Gait speed was independently associated with depressive disorders among very old adults (p <.001). The results showed significantly different mean gait speeds (m/s) between individuals with/without a depressive disorder (0.34 ± 0.24/0.52 ± 0.26, p <.001), between individuals with a depressive disorder with/without antidepressant treatment (0.35 ± 0.24/0.44 ± 0.24, p <.001) and between non-responders/responders to antidepressants (0.36 ± 0.21/0.42 ± 0.22, p =.020).

Conclusion: This is the first study focusing on very old adults that has shown an independent association between gait speed and depressive disorders. Responders to antidepressant medication had a higher mean gait speed than non-responders, which may imply shifts in function upon successful treatment.

Background: The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) has shown good validity and reliability, but few studies have examined the GDS among very old adults or the Swedish translation.

Objectives: Evaluate the validity and reliability of the Swedish version of GDS-15 among very old adults.

Methods: In the Umeå85 + /GErontological Regional DAtabase (GERDA) study, 387 participants were assessed with both the GDS-15 and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The mean age was 91 years. Concurrent validity between the scales was calculated using Spearman's correlation. We used the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) V symptom criteria for depression based on MADRS item scores to define depression. We calculated the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and found an optimal cut-off. A convenience sample with 60 individuals was used to calculate test–retest reliability with Cohen’s kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

Results: Spearman's correlation coefficients between total scores for GDS-15 and MADRS were 0.60. Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was 0.73. The AUC was 0.90 for distinguishing major depression, and the recommended cut-off of ≥ 5 showed a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 65.8%. The test–retest showed that Cohen’s kappa was substantial (0.71) and the ICC was excellent (0.95).

Conclusions: The Swedish version of the GDS-15 showed good validity and reliability among very old adults. The generally recommended cut-off of ≥ 5 seems reasonable to use with the Swedish version and among very old adults.