Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Bengtsson, Maria
Publikasjoner (10 av 82) Visa alla publikasjoner
Kostis, A., Albers, S., Vanderstraeten, J., Chinchanikar, S. & Bengtsson, M. (2024). Coopetitive dynamics, really?: towards an interaction perspective on coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 116, 158-169
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Coopetitive dynamics, really?: towards an interaction perspective on coopetition
Vise andre…
2024 (engelsk)Inngår i: Industrial Marketing Management, ISSN 0019-8501, E-ISSN 1873-2062, Vol. 116, s. 158-169Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Prior research has traditionally understood the dynamic nature of coopetition as shifts between relational states of coopetition over time and has treated coopetition interplay and coopetitive dynamics tautologically. This understanding is problematic because it fails to capture the continuous flux of changes in coopetitive relationships based on the finer details of partners' situated interactions on the micro-level. To overcome this limitation, this conceptual paper introduces the interaction perspective on coopetition, which allows us to uncover the microfoundations of the cooperation-competition interplay that bring about shifts in coopetitive relationships. By focusing researchers' attention on managers' reflecting-in-action, coopetition work that propels temporal interactions, and the relational embeddedness of their interactions, the interaction perspective helps us better understand the dynamic nature of coopetition and uncover the coopetitive dynamics feeding into the coopetition interplay and triggering moves towards new relational states. This paper makes four key contributions to the coopetition literature, outlines methodological implications of the suggested interaction perspective, and identifies avenues for further research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2024
Emneord
Cascading uncertainty, Coopetition work, Coopetitive dynamics, Interaction perspective, Reflecting-in-action, Relational embeddedness, Temporal dynamic interplay
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-218667 (URN)10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.12.005 (DOI)2-s2.0-85180099848 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2023-12-28 Laget: 2023-12-28 Sist oppdatert: 2023-12-28bibliografisk kontrollert
Stål, H. I., Riumkin, I. & Bengtsson, M. (2023). Business models for sustainability and firms' external relationships: a systematic literature review with propositions and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3887-3901
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Business models for sustainability and firms' external relationships: a systematic literature review with propositions and research agenda
2023 (engelsk)Inngår i: Business Strategy and the Environment, ISSN 0964-4733, E-ISSN 1099-0836, Vol. 32, nr 6, s. 3887-3901Artikkel, forskningsoversikt (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Increased focus on sustainability has made firms' value creation increasingly boundary spanning and complex. This begs the question of how business model research describes firm's external relationships, motivating us to undertake a systematic literature review. In analyzing 49 articles, we discuss and problematize four conceptualizations of external relationships - collaboration, alliances, networks, and ecosystems - arriving at nine propositions that clarify their meaning and refer to either firm-centric or collective business models for sustainability. In combining these findings with review results from conventional business model research we identify three main blind spots in extant business model for sustainability research, regarding coopetition, wider inter-organizational and sustainability tensions, and power. Based on these blind spots, we sketch a research agenda that could theorize business models for sustainability without neglecting their inherent tensions and contradictions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
John Wiley & Sons, 2023
Emneord
business model, collaboration, ecosystem, network, relationship, sustainability
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
hållbarhet
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-202580 (URN)10.1002/bse.3343 (DOI)000906757100001 ()2-s2.0-85145582080 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2019-00520Swedish Research Council Formas, 2021-0005
Tilgjengelig fra: 2023-01-12 Laget: 2023-01-12 Sist oppdatert: 2023-12-19bibliografisk kontrollert
Kostis, A., Bengtsson, M. & Corbo, L. (2022). Close to the edge but still alive: the role of relational coping in the light of an early project death. In: : . Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium 2022, Vienna, Austria, July 7-9, 2022.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Close to the edge but still alive: the role of relational coping in the light of an early project death
2022 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation only (Fagfellevurdert)
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-200761 (URN)
Konferanse
EGOS Colloquium 2022, Vienna, Austria, July 7-9, 2022
Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-11-05 Laget: 2022-11-05 Sist oppdatert: 2022-11-07bibliografisk kontrollert
Stål, H. I., Bengtsson, M. & Manzhynski, S. (2022). Cross‐sectoral collaboration in business model innovation for sustainable development: Tensions and compromises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 445-463
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Cross‐sectoral collaboration in business model innovation for sustainable development: Tensions and compromises
2022 (engelsk)Inngår i: Business Strategy and the Environment, ISSN 0964-4733, E-ISSN 1099-0836, Vol. 31, nr 1, s. 445-463Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Cross-sectoral collaboration is argued to be vital for business model innovation for sustainability and the tension-filled choices it involves but brings its own complexities. We therefore investigate how institutional logics and power affect the interests and dependencies of City planners and real-estate developers involved in developing a business model for sustainable mobility. Through analyzing how partners deal with tension-filled choices regarding business model elements, we develop a model to explain how compromises are made in partnerships characterized by conflicting interests coupled to strong interdependencies. We finish by cautioning that conflicting interests and power characteristics may delimit the potential for such cross-sectoral collaborations to contribute to sustainable development in sectors where public actors are used to rely on their authority.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
John Wiley & Sons, 2022
Emneord
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Geography, Planning and Development, Business and International Management
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
hållbarhet
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-188197 (URN)10.1002/bse.2903 (DOI)000702903600001 ()2-s2.0-85116138326 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
The Kamprad Family Foundation, 20160063Swedish Research Council Formas, 2019-00520
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-10-05 Laget: 2021-10-05 Sist oppdatert: 2023-08-17bibliografisk kontrollert
Kostis, A., Bengtsson, M. & H. Näsholm, M. (2022). Mechanisms and dynamics in the interplay of trust and distrust: insights from project-based collaboration. Organization Studies, 43(8), 1173-1196
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Mechanisms and dynamics in the interplay of trust and distrust: insights from project-based collaboration
2022 (engelsk)Inngår i: Organization Studies, ISSN 0170-8406, E-ISSN 1741-3044, Vol. 43, nr 8, s. 1173-1196Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Trust and distrust are two distinct organizing principles that play a critical role in interorganizational projects where highly interdependent organizations collaborate to build tailor-made and technologically complex solutions. Whereas an emerging body of research has debated the conceptual distinction between trust and distrust, this paper emphasizes the processual nature of trusting and distrusting and the interplay between them. Drawing upon insights from project-based collaboration in a complex products and systems industry, we explore the distinct cognitive and behavioral mechanisms through which trust and distrust work and orient firms towards optimism and watchfulness in the interaction. Our findings show that trust and distrust can act both as substitutes and complements through three interconnected dynamics—undermining, enabling, and compensating. These dynamics develop and recursively interrelate through interfirm interactions within single projects and in the broader network. We conclude by presenting our contributions to interorganizational trust literature and by proposing that the interplay of trust and distrust can have both positive and negative effects on the pursuit of project-based relationships.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Sage Publications, 2022
Emneord
distrust, interplay, organizing principle, project-based collaboration, trust
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-187675 (URN)10.1177/01708406211040215 (DOI)000694817600001 ()2-s2.0-85114691947 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2013-0741The Kempe Foundations
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-09-20 Laget: 2021-09-20 Sist oppdatert: 2022-12-19bibliografisk kontrollert
Bengtsson, M. & Raza-Ullah, T. (2022). Paradoxical tensions at multiple levels and top management team crosslevel bridging in coopetition: a conceptual model. Strategic Management Review
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Paradoxical tensions at multiple levels and top management team crosslevel bridging in coopetition: a conceptual model
2022 (engelsk)Inngår i: Strategic Management Review, ISSN 2688-2612, E-ISSN 2688-2639Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Accepted
Abstract [en]

In contrast to the conventional strategic management research, emphasizing either cooperation or competition as a beneficial strategy, the emerging literature on coopetition has advanced our knowledge of how the pursuit of both cooperation and competition could potentially lead to greater benefits. However, the literature offers scarce insights into the multi-level dynamics of coopetition and the role of TMT in addressing paradoxical tensions cascaded across levels, that, if not tackled well, can overturn the benefits associated with coopetition. Using key insights from the paradox literature, this paper develops a conceptual model that suggests how the coopetition paradox unfolds at different levels within the organization, activating performing, organizing, and belonging tensions, that, in turn, affect the dynamics of the interplay between cooperation and competition at the inter-firm level. Specifically, the model contributes by foregrounding TMT’s cross-level bridging role (i.e., uniform navigation within and among relationships at the interorganizational level through efficient orchestration of internal processes at organizational levels)

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Now Publishers Inc., 2022
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-197008 (URN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-06-21 Laget: 2022-06-21 Sist oppdatert: 2023-07-14
Manzhynski, S., Stål, H. & Bengtsson, M. (2020). Dealing with knotted paradoxes: A system dynamics approach to coopetition for sustainability. In: : . Paper presented at 36th European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium “Organizing for a Sustainable Future: Responsibility, Renewal & Resistance”, Hamburg, Germany, June 30 – July 4, 2020..
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Dealing with knotted paradoxes: A system dynamics approach to coopetition for sustainability
2020 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation only (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Organizational members are likely to face more than one paradox simultaneously. In order to conceptualize how paradoxes are knotted together and influence each other, paradox research needs to better account for dynamics and integrative aspects. In this paper we introduce the System Dynamics approach which we apply to coopetition for sustainability. Via an in-depth case study of a large-scale Swedish project to create a brand new, sustainable residential area, we are able to trace how the two paradoxes (coopetition and sustainability) influence each other but also take turns in dominating the processual unfolding. Our study contributes by developing and illustrating an approach to conceptualizing knotted paradoxes in general and coopetition for sustainability in particular.

Emneord
Paradox, tensions, system dynamics, coopetition for sustainability, knotted paradoxes
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-178810 (URN)
Konferanse
36th European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium “Organizing for a Sustainable Future: Responsibility, Renewal & Resistance”, Hamburg, Germany, June 30 – July 4, 2020.
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-01-18 Laget: 2021-01-18 Sist oppdatert: 2021-02-22bibliografisk kontrollert
Raza-Ullah, T. & Bengtsson, M. (2020). Does size matter in competitor collaborations? The effect of firm size on creating private and common value from coopetition. In: : . Paper presented at European Group of Organizational Studies, 36th EGOS Colloquium : Organising for a Sustainable Future: Responsibility, Renewal & Resistance, Hamburg, Germany, July 2-4, 2020.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Does size matter in competitor collaborations? The effect of firm size on creating private and common value from coopetition
2020 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation only (Annet vitenskapelig)
Emneord
coopetition, firm size, value creation
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
företagsekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-181631 (URN)
Konferanse
European Group of Organizational Studies, 36th EGOS Colloquium : Organising for a Sustainable Future: Responsibility, Renewal & Resistance, Hamburg, Germany, July 2-4, 2020
Forskningsfinansiär
The Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, W18-0024
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-03-21 Laget: 2021-03-21 Sist oppdatert: 2021-03-22bibliografisk kontrollert
Manzhynski, S., Bengtsson, M. & Stål, H. (2020). Knowledge sharing for corporate sustainability – a system dynamics approach. In: Academy of Management Proceedings: Annual Meeting Proceedings: Virtual 2020. Paper presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Virtual, August 7-11, 2020.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Knowledge sharing for corporate sustainability – a system dynamics approach
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Academy of Management Proceedings: Annual Meeting Proceedings: Virtual 2020, 2020Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Research is scarce on how competitors share knowledge with the intent to create balanced economic, social and environmental value. In this paper we conduct a single, in-depth case study and apply the System Dynamics approach to investigate how knowledge is shared and leveraged, as a system that evolves over time. In the developed model we identify causal loops that reinforce and hinder this system, including efforts both to work out, create and balance economic, social and environmental value. Based on the applied approach we suggest managerial mechanisms that could simultaneously regulate knowledge sharing interactions and balance sustainability demands.

Serie
Academy of Management Proceedings, ISSN 0065-0668, E-ISSN 2151-6561
Emneord
Environmental regulations, Corporate sustainability, Case studies
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-178813 (URN)10.5465/AMBPP.2020.19571abstract (DOI)
Konferanse
80th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Virtual, August 7-11, 2020
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-01-18 Laget: 2021-01-18 Sist oppdatert: 2021-02-22bibliografisk kontrollert
Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T. & Srivastava, M. (2020). Looking different vs thinking differently: Impact of TMT diversity on coopetition capability. Long range planning, 53(1), Article ID 101857.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Looking different vs thinking differently: Impact of TMT diversity on coopetition capability
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Long range planning, ISSN 0024-6301, E-ISSN 1873-1872, Vol. 53, nr 1, artikkel-id 101857Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study, we focus on the micro-foundations of coopetition capability and ask: "where does coopetition capability come from?" Drawing upon social psychology and cognitive theories, we seek to offer insights into the micro-foundations of coopetition capability by focusing on the role of top management team (TMT) diversity. We suggest that TMT diversity emerges from two distinct attributes of the team members: surface-level (e.g., age, gender, nationality) and deep-level (e.g., knowledge and experience). We argue that TMT diversity based on surface-level attributes contributes negatively while TMT diversity based on deep-level attributes contributes positively to coopetition capability. We test our hypotheses using a novel dataset that combines primary data and employee level secondary data of a sample of 315 Swedish firms. Results provide broad support for our hypotheses. We discuss the implications of our findings and key limitations of our study.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2020
Emneord
coopetition, TMT diversity, capability, management, inter-firm, alliance, paradox, tension
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
företagsekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-155692 (URN)10.1016/j.lrp.2018.11.001 (DOI)000517856300003 ()2-s2.0-85057135306 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2013-00741
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-01-26 Laget: 2019-01-26 Sist oppdatert: 2020-03-19bibliografisk kontrollert
Organisasjoner