Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Länk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Jaraite, Jurate
Alternativa namn
Publikationer (10 of 20) Visa alla publikationer
Löfgren, Å., Ahlvik, L., van den Bijgaart, I., Coria, J., Jaraite, J., Johnsson, F. & Rootzén, J. (2024). Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry. Climatic Change, 177(9), Article ID 147.
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry
Visa övriga...
2024 (Engelska)Ingår i: Climatic Change, ISSN 0165-0009, E-ISSN 1573-1480, Vol. 177, nr 9, artikel-id 147Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Historically, the basic materials industry has had relatively low R&D expenditure levels, raising concerns about meeting 2050 climate targets given the crucial need for innovation and technology advancement in this industry. Decisive government intervention and active support for key technological pathways are required to address significant market failures and catalyse industrial decarbonisation. This Essay lays out the economic justification for an active green industrial policy and proposes key policy design principles, with the aim of striking a balance between facilitating the green industrial transition and maintaining cost efficiency in meeting climate targets.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Nature, 2024
Nyckelord
Basic materials industry, Green industrial policy, Industrial decarbonisation
Nationell ämneskategori
Klimatvetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229654 (URN)10.1007/s10584-024-03801-7 (DOI)001310150800001 ()2-s2.0-85203526417 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forskningsrådet Formas, 2020-00174
Tillgänglig från: 2024-09-16 Skapad: 2024-09-16 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-04-24Bibliografiskt granskad
Kažukauskas, A., Broberg, T. & Jaraite, J. (2021). Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 123(2), 558-592
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, ISSN 0347-0520, E-ISSN 1467-9442, Vol. 123, nr 2, s. 558-592Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, we carry out a field experiment that contributes to the literature on how social comparisons affect residential energy and water use in two important ways. First, we study a social comparison treatment that is continuous and communicated via pre‐installed in‐home displays, which are salient and updated in real time. Second, we estimate the effects of provision of social comparisons on two distinguished resources – electricity and water – in the same experimental setting. We find that, on average, our social comparison reduces daily residential energy consumption by 6.7 percent but has no effect on overall residential water use.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
John Wiley & Sons, 2021
Nyckelord
consumer economics, electricity, field experiment, real-time displays, comparison information, water
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Forskningsämne
nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-179122 (URN)10.1111/sjoe.12422 (DOI)000625218200001 ()2-s2.0-85101933207 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Energimyndigheten, 39937-1
Tillgänglig från: 2021-01-26 Skapad: 2021-01-26 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-07-09Bibliografiskt granskad
Hu, X., Jaraite, J. & Kažukauskas, A. (2021). The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the Swedish intraday market. Energy Economics, 96, Article ID 105159.
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the Swedish intraday market
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Energy Economics, ISSN 0140-9883, E-ISSN 1873-6181, Vol. 96, artikel-id 105159Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

We investigate the process of electricity price formation in the Swedish intraday market, given a large share of wind power in the Swedish electricity system. According to Karanfil and Li's (2017) approach, if the intraday market is efficient, with large shares of intermittent electricity in the entire electricity system, intraday prices should send signals based on scarcity pricing for balancing power. Based on this theory, we analyze Swedish electricity market data for the period 2015–2018 and find that the Swedish intraday market, despite its small trading volumes, is functioning properly. In particular, our results show that intraday price premia mostly respond to wind power forecast errors and other imbalances resulting from either supply or demand sides of the electricity market, as they should if the intraday market is efficient. The results of wind power forecast errors hold for central and southern Sweden, but not for northern Sweden where the share of wind power production is still very small. However, we find no effect of unplanned nuclear power plant outages on intraday price premia.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2021
Nyckelord
Day-ahead market, Electricity, Forecast errors, Intraday market, Intraday price premia, Nuclear power outages, Sweden, Wind power
Nationell ämneskategori
Energisystem
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-180992 (URN)10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105159 (DOI)000634560900010 ()2-s2.0-85101104168 (Scopus ID)
Tillgänglig från: 2021-03-05 Skapad: 2021-03-05 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-09-05Bibliografiskt granskad
Coria, J. & Jaraite, J. (2019). Transaction Costs of Upstream Versus Downstream Pricing of CO2 Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 72(4), 965-1001
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Transaction Costs of Upstream Versus Downstream Pricing of CO2 Emissions
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: Environmental and Resource Economics, ISSN 0924-6460, E-ISSN 1573-1502, Vol. 72, nr 4, s. 965-1001Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper comparing empirically the transaction costs of the monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) required by two environmental regulations aimed to cost-efficiently reduce greenhouse gas emissions: a carbon dioxide (CO2) tax and an emissions trading system. We do this in the case of Sweden, where a set of firms are covered by both types of regulations—the Swedish CO2 tax and the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Our results indicate that there is a significant degree of heterogeneity in the transaction costs of the firms in our sample. Moreover, for some of the firms, the transaction costs are high when compared with the actual cost of the CO2 tax and the price of the EU ETS. Furthermore, we find that the MRV costs are lower for CO2 taxation than for the EU ETS, which confirms the general view that regulating emissions upstream via a CO2 tax yields lower transaction costs vis-á-vis downstream regulation via emissions trading.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Netherlands, 2019
Nyckelord
Climate change, CO2 tax, Emissions trading, Firm-level data, EU ETS, Transaction costs, Sweden
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-152789 (URN)10.1007/s10640-018-0235-y (DOI)000466316700004 ()2-s2.0-85043684700 (Scopus ID)
Tillgänglig från: 2018-10-24 Skapad: 2018-10-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-01-17Bibliografiskt granskad
Jaraite, J., Karimu, A. & Kazukauskas, A. (2017). Policy-induced expansion of solar and wind power capacity: economic growth and employment in EU countries. Energy Journal, 38(5), 197-222
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Policy-induced expansion of solar and wind power capacity: economic growth and employment in EU countries
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Energy Journal, ISSN 0195-6574, E-ISSN 1944-9089, Vol. 38, nr 5, s. 197-222Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Given the intensifying debates on whether governments should promote particular renewable energy technologies, the main objective of this study is to investigate the long-and short-run effects of policy-induced expansion of renewable solar and wind technologies on economic growth and employment in 15 European Union (EU) member states during 1990-2013 by using panel-data time-series econometric techniques. Instead of relying on renewable energy consumption or generation as commonly done in the literature, we focus on the capacity for solar and wind power generation, which is largely a consequence of the EU's renewable energy policies. In summary, we find that, to date, renewable energy policy-induced wind and solar power capacity promotes growth and/or employment in the short run, but these capacity increases do not stimulate economic growth in the long run in the EU-15 region. In fact, our results tend to support the opposite relationship: increases in wind and solar power capacity are associated with negative economic growth, at least at the total economy level.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
International Association for Energy Economics, 2017
Nyckelord
Economic growth, Employment, European Union, Granger causality, Panel cointegration, Policy, Renewable energy capacity, Solar energy, Wind energy
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-131723 (URN)10.5547/01956574.38.5.jjar (DOI)000408059400010 ()2-s2.0-85028624452 (Scopus ID)
Tillgänglig från: 2017-02-20 Skapad: 2017-02-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-03-24Bibliografiskt granskad
Kazukauskas, A., Broberg, T. & Jaraite, J. (2017). The peer comparison in real time: a field experiment of water and electricity consumption.
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>The peer comparison in real time: a field experiment of water and electricity consumption
2017 (Engelska)Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

A large body of literature shows that the provision of social comparisons can cause households to reduce residential energy and water use. In this paper, we carry out a field experiment that contributes to this literature in two important ways. First, we study a social comparison treatment that is continuous and communicated via pre-installed in-home displays, which are salient and updated in real time. Second, we estimate the effects of provision of social comparisons on two distinguished resources – electricity and water – in the same experimental setting. We find that, on average, our social comparison reduces daily residential energy consumption by 6.7 percent but has no effect on overall residential water use. The electricity savings are impersistent and occur in the evening hours, which only slightly overlap with peak hours. We argue that electricity conservation due to social comparisons is driven by short-run changes in households’ electricity saving behavior

Förlag
s. 40
Serie
CERE Working Paper ; 2017:8
Nyckelord
Consumer economics, Electricity, Field experiment, Real-time displays, Comparison information, Water
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-152791 (URN)
Tillgänglig från: 2018-10-24 Skapad: 2018-10-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-11-09Bibliografiskt granskad
Jaraite, J. & Di Maria, C. (2016). Did the EU ETS Make a Difference?: An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data. Energy Journal, 37(1), 1-23
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Did the EU ETS Make a Difference?: An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data
2016 (Engelska)Ingår i: Energy Journal, ISSN 0195-6574, E-ISSN 1944-9089, Vol. 37, nr 1, s. 1-23Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

We use a panel dataset of about 5,000 Lithuanian firms between 2003 and 2010, to assess the impact of the EU ETS on the environmental and economic perfor­mance of participating firms. Using a matching methodology, we are able to estimate the causal impact of EU ETS participation on C02 emissions, C02 in­tensity, investment behaviour and profitability of participating firms. Our results show that ETS participation did not lead to a reduction in C02 emissions, while we identify a slight improvement in C02 intensity. ETS participants are shown to have retired part of their less efficient capital stock, and to have made modest additional investments from 2010. We also show that the EU ETS did not rep­resent a drag on the profitability of participating firms.

Nyckelord
Cap and trade, C02 emissions, EU emissions trading system, Ex-post evaluation, Firm competitiveness. Investment, Matching, Panel data, Profits
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-104610 (URN)10.5547/01956574.37.2.jjar (DOI)000367634800001 ()
Tillgänglig från: 2015-06-12 Skapad: 2015-06-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-06Bibliografiskt granskad
Coria, J. & Jaraite, J. (2015). Carbon pricing: transaction costs of emissions trading vs. carbon taxes. Umeå
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Carbon pricing: transaction costs of emissions trading vs. carbon taxes
2015 (Engelska)Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

In this paper we empirically compare the transaction costs from monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) of two environmental regulations directed to cost-efficiently reduce greenhouse gas emissions: a carbon dioxide (CO2) tax and a tradable emissions system. We do this in the case of Sweden, where a set of firms are covered by both types of regulations, i.e., the Swedish CO2 tax and the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). This provides us with an excellent case study as it allows us to disentangle the costs of each regulation from other firm-specific variables that might affect the overall cost of MRV procedures. Our results indicate that the MRV costs of CO2 taxation do not depend on firms’ emissions, while they do in the case of the EU ETS. For firms of equivalent emissions’ size, the MRV costs are lower for CO2 taxation than for the EU ETS, which confirms the general view that regulating emissions upstream by means of a CO2 tax yields lower transaction costs vis-á-vis downstream regulation by means of emission trading.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Umeå: , 2015. s. 32
Serie
CERE Working Paper Series ; 2015:2
Nyckelord
Carbon dioxide emissions, Carbon tax, Emissions Trading, EU ETS, Firm-level data, Sweden
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-104612 (URN)
Tillgänglig från: 2015-06-12 Skapad: 2015-06-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad
Jaraite-Kazukauske, J. & Kazukauskas, A. (2015). Do transaction costs influence firm trading behaviourin the European emissions trading system?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 62(3), 583-613
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Do transaction costs influence firm trading behaviourin the European emissions trading system?
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Environmental and Resource Economics, ISSN 0924-6460, E-ISSN 1573-1502, Vol. 62, nr 3, s. 583-613Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This study is one of the first to empirically investigate firm trading behaviour and the importance of permit trading transaction costs, such as information costs and search costs, in the first phase of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). The signs and significance of our constructed transaction costs proxy variables indicate for a presence of these costs in the initial years of the EU ETS. In particular, this paper shows that ETS firms with the smaller number of installations and with less trading experience were less likely to participate in the European emissions trading market and traded the lower quantities of permits. Furthermore, these firms chose to trade permits indirectly via third parties. This study also supports the concerns that transaction costs could be excessive for smaller participants and firms operating in the new EU member states.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer-Verlag New York, 2015
Nyckelord
Climate policy, Emissions trading, EU ETS, European Union, Firm-level data, Trading behaviour, Transaction costs
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-94625 (URN)10.1007/s10640-014-9831-7 (DOI)000364221800009 ()2-s2.0-84946474212 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning

Published online 9 October 2014.

Tillgänglig från: 2014-10-14 Skapad: 2014-10-14 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-03-24Bibliografiskt granskad
Jaraite, J., Karimu, A., Andrius, K. & Kazukauskas, P. (2015). Renewable energy policy, economic growth and employment in EU countries: gain without pain?. Umeå
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Renewable energy policy, economic growth and employment in EU countries: gain without pain?
2015 (Engelska)Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Given the intensifying debates whether governments should use industrial policies to promote particular renewable energy technologies, the main objective of this study is to investigate the long-run effects of renewable energy support policies on economic growth and employment in 15 European Union (EU) member states for the 1990-2012 time period by using panel-data time-series econometric techniques. The first hypothesis is that the EU’s renewable energy support policies lead to technological advancement, followed by economy growth, in the long-run. The second hypothesis states that these policies at least generate an increase in output and employment in the short-run. In summary, our results provide some evidence in support of the second hypothesis, but, in contrary to the similar studies, our findings do not support the first hypothesis that these policies promote growth in the long-run.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Umeå: , 2015. s. 30
Serie
CERE Working Paper Serries ; 2015:7
Nyckelord
economic growth, EU, Granger causality, panel cointegration, policy, renewable energy
Nationell ämneskategori
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-104611 (URN)
Tillgänglig från: 2015-06-12 Skapad: 2015-06-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad
Organisationer

Sök vidare i DiVA

Visa alla publikationer