Open this publication in new window or tab >>Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.
Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Central Hospital Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Ryhov Regional Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Neurophysiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.
Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Central Hospital Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden.
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neuroimmunology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neuroimmunology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Neurologiska kliniken, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Neurology, ISSN 1351-5101, E-ISSN 1468-1331, Vol. 32, no 11, article id e70418Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: The placebo-controlled RINOMAX trial (NCT02950155) demonstrated superiority up to 12 months of rituximab over standard-of-care in new-onset generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), but benefit–risk over longer time frames remains unknown.
Methods: RINOMAX included 47 participants with a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score ≥ 6. Twenty-five patients were randomized to a single intravenous infusion of 500 mg rituximab, and 22 to placebo of which 16 received rituximab after the double-blinded phase (7 ± 2.9 months). Data were extracted from the Swedish MG registry to track hospitalizations, treatments including rescue, and disease activity scores.
Results: Compared to the placebo arm, lower mean time-weighted QMG scores at 12 months (mean difference [MD]: 2.9, 95% CI: 0.9, 4.9; p = 0.005) and 24 months (MD: 2.6, 95% CI: 0.3, 4.9; p = 0.027) were observed in the RTX arm. The incidence rate of rescue from 48 weeks up to 5 years was numerically higher in the placebo arm than RTX (0.16 vs. 0.09/person-year; p = 0.121). Compared to delayed RTX, early exposure displayed lower QMG, risk of hospitalization (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07, 0.83), and rescue (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.14, 1.57), but also the six patients never receiving RTX showed lower hospitalization risk (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01, 0.96). Corticosteroid doses were low globally throughout. Overall, 12.5% and 18.8% and of patients with early and delayed RTX, respectively, suffered a severe infection.
Conclusion: Disease activity and treatment burden, including hospitalization and rescue treatments, remained low, indicating a potential benefit of rituximab on the long-term disease trajectory. Infection risk with B cell depletion, however, remains a concern.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025
Keywords
controlled clinical trials, generalized myasthenia gravis, observational study, randomized, rituximab
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-246512 (URN)10.1111/ene.70418 (DOI)41194516 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105020993336 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2023-00533Region Stockholm, FoUI-987565
2025-11-252025-11-252025-11-25Bibliographically approved