Open this publication in new window or tab >>College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Unit of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Unit of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Research Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Stereo-tactic Radiosurgery, Centro Diagnostico Italiano S.p.A., Milan, Italy.
Unit of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Research Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy.
College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Unit of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; AI Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Diagnosis, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Big Data System Computing Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Show others...
2026 (English)In: IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, ISSN 2168-2194, E-ISSN 2168-2208, Vol. 30, no 4, p. 3307-3320Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
COVID-19 prognosis using clinical tabular data faces significant challenges due to missing values and class imbalance issues. Existing methods often overlook the complex high-order interrelationship among clinicalattributes and struggle with training stability on imbalanced datasets. We propose ACGM, an attribute-centric graph modeling network that simultaneously addresses missing data imputation and COVID-19 prognosis. ACGM consists of three key modules: an attributes preprocessing module (APM) for coarse-grained imputation initialization, a graph-enhanced attributes imputation module (GEAIM) that models high-order inter-attribute relationships through graph structures, and a graph-enhanced disease prognosis module (GEDPM) that leverages these complex attribute interactions for final prediction. GEAIM and GEDPM employ a mean-teacher strategy with attributes graph matching to preserve high-order relationships, enhance training stability, and maintain structural integrity of attribute interactions. Extensive experiments are conducted on four public COVID-19 tabular datasets, demonstrating the superiority of our ACGM over existing methods. Through comprehensive interpretability analysis, we identify that attributes such as LDH, Difficulty In Breathing, and SaO2 significantly impact COVID-19 prognosis, aligning well with clinical insights and radiologist assessments.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2026
Keywords
attribute-centric, COVID-19 prognosis, graph, missing tabular data imputation
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-252258 (URN)10.1109/JBHI.2025.3618935 (DOI)41056179 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105018503443 (Scopus ID)
2026-04-202026-04-202026-04-20Bibliographically approved