Umeå University's logo

Background: The Vertigo Symptom Scale–short form (VSS–SF) is commonly used to measure dizziness and vertigo over the past month. This study aimed to (1) adapt the VSS–SF for the Swedish population and assess its psychometric properties, and (2) develop a modified version for measuring symptoms in the acute phase of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS).

Methods: The VSS–SF was translated into Swedish and adapted cross-culturally. Its psychometric properties were evaluated in 86 AVS patients, both in the acute stage (1–7 days from symptom onset) with a modified acute version, and after six weeks of vestibular rehabilitation using the standard VSS–SF. Factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency were analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed at six weeks. Participants were also evaluated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and balance tests. Controls included 54 healthy participants.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure for both versions, corresponding to vertigo-balance (VSS–V) and autonomic-anxiety (VSS–A) subscales. Both versions demonstrated strong factor structures with adequate loadings. Internal consistency was high for the standard version (Cronbach’s alpha 0.76 to 0.87) and for the total and VSS–V subscale of the acute version (0.82 and 0.85, respectively), but poor for the acute VSS–A subscale (0.50). Convergent validity was supported by Spearman’s rank correlations. The discriminative ability was excellent for the acute VSS–SF and VSS–V (AUC 0.98 and 0.99), and acceptable for VSS–A (AUC 0.77). After six weeks, discriminative ability decreased but remained above 0.5. Test-retest reliability at six weeks was excellent for all scales (ICC 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93 for VSS–SF, VSS–V, and VSS–A).

Conclusions: The VSS–SF was successfully adapted for the Swedish population, including an acute version for early dizziness assessment. Both versions confirmed a robust two-factor structure, with the acute version showing excellent early discriminative ability, particularly for the vertigo-balance dimension. However, the autonomic-anxiety subscale showed weaker psychometric properties, suggesting limited suitability for AVS patients. The adapted scales show promise for clinical use in diagnosing and evaluating dizziness and vertigo in the Swedish population.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05056324, September 24, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056324.

Introduction: Tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) has several benefits over alteplase (tPA) in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials have shown promising results. In June 2017, the Stroke Unit at Sundsvall County Hospital switched from tPA to TNK-tPA in standard clinical practice. This study examines the effects of that shift.

Methods: All thrombolysis treatments performed during the first twenty-four months with TNK-tPA (168) were compared to the last twenty-four months with tPA (191). Data were collected from patient records. Follow-up time was 30 days. Co-primary outcomes were death and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH). Secondary outcomes were types of intracerebral bleeding and cause of death. Tertiary outcome was door-to-needle time (DNT).

Results: Treatment groups were of comparable age (75.7 ± 0.2 years). tPA-treated patients had an NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score of 9.2 versus 7.5 for TNK-tPA. Patients older than 80 had more severe strokes (median NIHSS 9 versus 5). SICH occurred in 6 (3.6 %) patients in the TNK-tPA group and in 2 (1.0 %) treated with tPA, odds ratio (OR) 3.41 (0.70–16.7). Numbers for death were 21 (12.5 %) and 31 (15.2 %), OR 0.77 (0.46–1.29), meaning no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Predominant cause of death was cerebral infarction. DNT with tenecteplase was shorter: mean 44 versus 26, and median 35 versus 19 min.

Conclusions: Switching from alteplase to tenecteplase was associated with shorter time to treatment. To draw certain conclusions regarding safety or efficacy would require a larger material.

Background: Dizziness and vertigo affect around 15% of adults annually and represent common reasons for contacting health services, accounting for around 3% of all emergency department visits worldwide. Vertigo is also associated with excessive use of diagnostic imaging and emergency care and decreased productivity, primarily because of work absenteeism. Vestibular rehabilitation is an evidence-based treatment for chronic dizziness and supervised group exercise therapy has recently been shown to be effective after vestibular neuritis, a common cause of acute onset vertigo. However, such interventions are not readily available and there is a need for more easily accessible tools. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects on vestibular symptoms of a 6-week online vestibular rehabilitation tool after acute onset vertigo, with the aim of aiding vestibular rehabilitation by presenting a more accessible tool that can help to reduce recovery time. Methods: Three hundred twenty individuals diagnosed with acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) will be recruited from multiple hospitals in Sweden and the effects of an online vestibular rehabilitation tool, YrselTräning, on vestibular symptoms after acute onset vertigo will be compared to standard care (written instructions leaflet) in a two-armed, evaluator-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome will be the Vertigo Symptom Scale Short Form (VSS-SF) score at 6 weeks after symptom onset. Secondary outcomes include effects of the intervention on activities of daily living, mood and anxiety, vestibular function recovery, mobility measures, health economic effects, and the reliability of the Swedish VSS-SF translation. Discussion: Participants using the online vestibular rehabilitation tool are expected to recover earlier and to a greater extent from their symptoms as compared to standard care. Since up to 50% of people with AVS without treatment develop persistent symptoms, effective treatment of AVS will likely lead to a higher quality of life and help reduce the societal costs associated with dizziness and vertigo. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05056324. Registered on September 24, 2021.