Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Hedman, Harald
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Song, J., Zhou, Y., Hedman, H., Rantapero, T. & Landström, M. (2025). Identification of progression markers for prostate cancer. Cell Cycle, 24(17-20), 382-399
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Identification of progression markers for prostate cancer
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Cell Cycle, ISSN 1538-4101, E-ISSN 1551-4005, Vol. 24, no 17-20, p. 382-399Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

TGFβ functions as a tumor suppressor or promoter, depending on the context, making TGFβ a useful predictive biomarker. Genes related to TGFβ signaling and Aurora kinase were tested for their ability to predict the progression risk of primary prostate tumors. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we trained an elastic-net regularized Cox regression model including a minimal set of gene expression, copy number (CN), and clinical data. A multi-step feature selection and regularization scheme was applied to minimize the number of features while maintaining predictive power. An independent hold-out cohort was used to validate the model. Expanding from prostate cancer, predictive models were similarly trained on all other eligible cancer types in TCGA. AURKA, AURKB, and KIF23 were predictive biomarkers of prostate cancer progression, and upregulation of these genes was associated with promotion of cell-cycle progression. Extending the analysis to other TCGA cancer types revealed a trend of increased predictive performance on validation data when clinical features were complemented with molecular features, with notable variation between cancer types and clinical endpoints. Our findings suggest that TGFβ signaling genes, prostate cancer related genes and Aurora kinases are strong candidates for patient-specific clinical predictions and could help guide personalized therapeutic decisions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025
Keywords
AURKA/B, Cancer, KIF23, prognostic modeling, TGFBR1
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Cell and Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-245493 (URN)10.1080/15384101.2025.2563930 (DOI)001584314700001 ()2-s2.0-105017977886 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, 20 0964Swedish Cancer Society, 23 2902Umeå UniversityRegion Västerbotten, RV-993591Familjen Erling-Perssons StiftelseSwedish Research Council, 2023–0237ProstatacancerförbundetCancerforskningsfonden i Norrland, LP 24–2364
Available from: 2025-10-21 Created: 2025-10-21 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
Johansson, Å., Andreassen, O. A., Brunak, S., Franks, P. W., Hedman, H., Loos, R. J. F., . . . Jacobsson, B. (2023). Precision medicine in complex diseases—Molecular subgrouping for improved prediction and treatment stratification. Journal of Internal Medicine, 294(4), 378-396
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Precision medicine in complex diseases—Molecular subgrouping for improved prediction and treatment stratification
Show others...
2023 (English)In: Journal of Internal Medicine, ISSN 0954-6820, E-ISSN 1365-2796, Vol. 294, no 4, p. 378-396Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Complex diseases are caused by a combination of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors and comprise common noncommunicable diseases, including allergies, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric and metabolic disorders. More than 25% of Europeans suffer from a complex disease, and together these diseases account for 70% of all deaths. The use of genomic, molecular, or imaging data to develop accurate diagnostic tools for treatment recommendations and preventive strategies, and for disease prognosis and prediction, is an important step toward precision medicine. However, for complex diseases, precision medicine is associated with several challenges. There is a significant heterogeneity between patients of a specific disease—both with regards to symptoms and underlying causal mechanisms—and the number of underlying genetic and nongenetic risk factors is often high. Here, we summarize precision medicine approaches for complex diseases and highlight the current breakthroughs as well as the challenges. We conclude that genomic-based precision medicine has been used mainly for patients with highly penetrant monogenic disease forms, such as cardiomyopathies. However, for most complex diseases—including psychiatric disorders and allergies—available polygenic risk scores are more probabilistic than deterministic and have not yet been validated for clinical utility. However, subclassifying patients of a specific disease into discrete homogenous subtypes based on molecular or phenotypic data is a promising strategy for improving diagnosis, prediction, treatment, prevention, and prognosis. The availability of high-throughput molecular technologies, together with large collections of health data and novel data-driven approaches, offers promise toward improved individual health through precision medicine.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023
Keywords
complex diseases, genetic variations, genomic medicine, GWAS, molecular profiling, multi omics, polygenic risk score (PRS), precision medicine
National Category
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-208069 (URN)10.1111/joim.13640 (DOI)000974676300001 ()37093654 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85153517541 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019-01497Swedish Research Council, 2016-0386Swedish Research Council, 2018-05619Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20200687Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20210546Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20210519Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20200693The Swedish Brain FoundationSwedish Cancer Society, 22 2222 PjNovo Nordisk Foundation, NF17OC002759Novo Nordisk Foundation, NNF14CC001Novo Nordisk Foundation, NF20OC005931
Available from: 2023-05-29 Created: 2023-05-29 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications