Umeå University's logo

Elite sport should be an anomaly in Scandinavia, a context epitomising egalitarian values and often characterised by a cultural scepticism towards overt individualism and personal success. So how is it that elite sport is not only possible, but also widely celebrated and cherished by disproportionately large segments of the Scandinavian populations? In this chapter, we propose that part of the answer lies in a series of compromises that bridge deeply ingrained ideological commitments with the modernising forces embedded in the development of contemporary sport. We focus on two phenomena in Scandinavian sport that we conceptualise as compromises: first, the tension between the phenomenological structure of sport and children's rights; and second, the balance between developing young elite athletes and preparing them for a productive working life. Taken together, these compromises illustrate how moderation in Scandinavia is not merely an ideological middle ground, but a strategic approach – one that underpins the long-term sporting success of the region.

This study unpacks the conditions for, characteristics of, and consequences of employed ‘background’ work/ers in grassroots sport. Contrary to existing knowledge on ‘off-field’ sport staff, it applies an organisational sociology lens to address paid work as a basic yet neglected form of professionalisation. Drawing on institutional role theory and semi-structured interviews with sport club staff, we show the distinctiveness of paid work in otherwise volunteer contexts. Specifically, we demonstrate how paid professionals occupy a paradoxical position as employees primarily governed by a democracy/volunteering logic. Ironically, it is precisely because paid staff understand their work through this lens that their everyday ‘muddling through’ harbours potential for ‘downwards’ professionalisation effects vis-à-vis member/volunteer roles. Our analysis suggests the significance of extending sport sociology's premise (i.e., that sport matters) to include those that work ‘in the shadows’ of sport.

Integration of migrants is currently among the most relevant political issues in Western societies. In this context, voluntary sport clubs (VSCs) have been granted substantial trust to bring people together in joint sport activities. However, despite ambitious programmes launched by public authorities and/, or sport federations, a relatively small proportion of VSCs engage with such targeted initiatives. The existing literature provides explanations as to why VSCs do not implement external initiatives, but it falls notably short in explaining why they do. Therefore, the aim of our contribution is to understand why some VSCs implement programmes that promote social integration of people with a migration background. In a multi-case study design across five European countries, we developed, based on document analysis and interviews with key decision-makers case study reports of 30 VSCs engaged in programmes for the target group. From these cases, we identified a range of VSCs′ organisational identities (Stenling and Fahlén, 2016) that demonstrate clubs’ varying willingness along different horizons of justification to implement integrative measures. A typology constructed based on these organisational identities advances the understanding of clubs’ ambitions to further integrative goals and can be used by public authorities and sport federations to stimulate and support club-level processes.

Talent development environments are usually group-based, meaning athletes comprise each other’s learning context. Consequently, athletes’ ability to learn with and from each other is essential. This implies that there is a key role for coaches to play in cultivating reciprocal, cooperative athletes and creating talent environments in which participants can ‘learn to learn’. The aim of this study was to create knowledge on day-to-day coaching conduct that supports the development of athletes’ reciprocal abilities. Observations of 75 h of football (soccer) lessons within the Swedish Football Association’s school sports programme – a cornerstone of the FA’s talent development system, located in upper secondary schools – were carried out over the course of three school semesters, and included in-depth interviews with the teacher-coaches. Data were analysed using the five key teaching pillars within a cooperative learning approach: positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction, interpersonal skills and group processing. Findings show how teacher-coaches engage in activities that focus on organization of lessons and structuring of group work to create situations where individuals are motivated to learn, but also motivated to support other group members’ learning. Thereby, teacher-coaches place more emphasis on positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction. In contrast, findings also show how teacher-coaches to a lesser extent perform coaching conduct associated with lesson content that has the potential to develop the skills and abilities required to participate in and benefit from group work – interpersonal skills, and group processing. This means that while teacher-coaches seem well-equipped to create learning environments that support reciprocal learning, they may benefit from challenging the role of the coach as an expert and tackle the preconceptions around cooperative behaviours that athletes bring from club football contexts. Taken together, these findings point to the need for a better understanding of overlapping learning sites within talent systems.

The purpose of this article is to (re)assert the importance of an organizational lens in the socio-cultural study of sport. Specifically, we aim to demonstrate the often self-perpetuating and always value-infused nature of rational design, and the organizational processes through which problems, objectives, structures, roles, identities, and knowledges are (re)constituted in the context of sport. Drawing on an institutional understanding of organizational life, we examine Swedish sport's adoption of a new integrity platform as a case of rational design. Analyzing documentary and interview data, we demonstrate how positing organization as the object of knowledge allows us to unpack how, why, and with what effects, social issues and domains because subsumed into processes of rationalization and rational organizational design. 

The purpose of this paper is to explore the typifications surrounding the emerging Integrity Officer role, and to discuss the potential side-effects of the ways in which integrity measures are shaped and implemented. Drawing on 31 semi-structured interviews with Integrity Officer role incumbents and staff in direct interaction with this role, our analysis shows how the typification of the role is characterised by three contextually shaped contradictions. We furthermore demonstrate that ambiguity regarding fundamental aspects of role performance abounds, and that attempts and wishes to deal with ambiguities foreshadow further organisational change. Our account moves sport integrity research forward via an analysis focused on the meaning of doing a good job, rather than the effectiveness of integrity instruments.

Voluntary sports clubs (VSCs) are viewed by governments as an important catalyst for the integration of migrants/refugees. However, research has shown that only a small number of VSCs are directly involved in ‘integration through sport’ practices. To increase the ­number of VSCs that are willing and able to significantly implement targeted integration measures, it is necessary to understand how ‘integration through sport policies’ can actually reach the local level and impact practices. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework that considers and bundles current integration research in organized sports. To address the complexity, a multi-level framework will be developed that helps to understand the roll-out strategies and implementation processes of integration programmes for migrants in organized sports. Additionally, it helps to support practitioners in developing appropriate evaluation schemes, or revising existing integration programmes at the local, regional or national level in order to increase the number of integrative VSCs.

The purpose of this article is to examine the role played by organizational culture in young people’s continuing underrepresentation in decision-making bodies, despite structural changes, in the context of Norwegian sport organizations. Data is based on a questionnaire centred on the experiences of young people in sport governance (n = 32 youth representatives) and semi-structured interviews with young (under 26 years) and older representatives of organizations affiliated with the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederations of Sports (n = 10). Findings show that Norwegian sport organizations foster a cultural understanding of young people which takes its structural expression in the separation of elements that are ‘othering’ the youth. Youth have also limited access to resources of power as a result of a lack of trust in older leaders. Prevailing culture mirrors an adult society in which young people need to upgrade their level of professionalism through education before they are invited to decision-making processes.

Coaching in Scandinavia is characterized by tensions between voluntary ideals and increased demands for professionalization. This paper examines the origins and content of such demands, how voluntary run and governed football clubs translate them into practices, and the impact of professionalization on the coach role. Within an organizational perspective, our analysis is framed by institutional theory and a translation perspective and draw on data from interviews with representatives of Norwegian football clubs. The results show how demands for professionalization are translated into (new) practices in football clubs and lead to (more) professionalization of the coach role. In a 'top-down' trajectory, professionalization is characterized by bureaucratization driven by a need to satisfy the Norwegian Football Federation and Norwegian Elite Football. In a 'bottom-up' trajectory, professionalization is characterized by individualization driven by pressures from members to tailor-make the club’s service offer. In a 'trickle-sideways' trajectory, professionalization is characterized by marketization driven by the establishment of private football academies that exert pressure on football clubs to adapt to a more customer-oriented membership base. In conclusion, this examination highlights the multidimensional character of the professionalization of the coach role and emphasizes the need for further research on the broader ramifications of professionalization in contexts characterized by voluntary ideals.

Conceptualising the youth representative as an institutional role, we explore the institutional shaping of youth representatives as change agents in the governance of sport organisations. Focusing on how these shaping conditions who the youth representative can be and what determines the scope of their role fulfilment, including the impact of their work on established institutional orders, allows us to examine the shaping of agency related to governance institutions. Data is drawn from a questionnaire centred on the experiences of young people in sport governance (n = 32) and semi-structured interviews with 10 representatives of organisations affiliated with the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederations of Sports. The role of the youth representatives is scripted in terms of who the representatives ought to be and what they ought to do. The scripting associated with the operationalisation of this ambition into role pre- and proscriptions stands in stark contrast to the ideal of youth representatives as agents of institutional change. Our study of the scripting of institutional roles has theoretical implications because it shows how normative typifications that link notions of actors with actorhood circumscribe institutional work pertaining to change.