Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; CMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
CMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Cardiology, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Cardiology, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
CMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Geriatrics and Emergency Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
CMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
IMPORTANCE: Risk stratification strategies in primary prevention of coronary events lack precision.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prediction of first coronary events is improved by adding information on coronary atherosclerosis from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to a model using the pooled cohort equation (PCE) risk score tool and the coronary artery calcification score (CACS).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study including individuals aged 50 to 64 years randomly recruited from the general population and examined at 6 university hospitals in Sweden from 2013 to 2018, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years. A sample of 30 154 individuals underwent cardiopulmonary imaging, physical examinations, routine laboratory tests, questionnaires, and/or functional tests. This study included 24 791 individuals without previous cardiovascular disease for whom high-quality CCTA images were available. Events were followed up via registers until September 2024.
EXPOSURES: The information used from the CCTA images was the extent of coronary atherosclerosis (segment involvement score), presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis, and presence of coronary obstructive disease (stenosis ≥50%).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome was a composite of first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 304 coronary events occurred. Segment involvement scores of 3 to 4 and greater than 4 and presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis were associated with hazard ratios of 2.71 (95% CI, 1.34-5.44), 5.27 (95% CI, 2.50-11.07), and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.23-2.22), respectively. In a model based on the PCE and CACS, CCTA-derived data improved risk discrimination (C statistic improved from 0.764 to 0.779; P = .004) and risk reclassification (net reclassification improvement of 0.133 [95% CI, 0.031-0.165]), conferred a net correct upward reclassification of 14.2% in those with events and incorrectly classified 1.6% of participants not experiencing an event into a higher-risk category. Because of the low event rate in the cohort, reclassification mainly occurred in the group classified as at low risk (<5%) according to the PCE.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Information on coronary atherosclerosis from CCTA modestly improved risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors and CACS in identifying individuals at risk of coronary events and in need of primary prevention.