Umeå University's logo

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) following orthopedic surgery impacts patient outcomes. Airborne transmission is one potential route of infection. Despite their high cost and resource demands, modern ventilation systems have shown limited efficacy in reducing SSI rates. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a low-cost air purifier in reducing SSI rates after orthopedic surgery.

METHODS: In a nationwide, multicenter, double-blind, cluster-randomized crossover, placebo-controlled superiority trial, we included all patients undergoing orthopedic surgery during the trial period. The intervention group underwent surgery in operating rooms with active Novaerus NV800 air purifiers, while the control group underwent surgery in operating rooms with the same air purifiers that were inactive. The primary end point was SSI within 12 weeks post surgery, defined as a postsurgery infection marker (PSIM), a custom composite outcome based on registry codes for prescribed antibiotics, diagnoses, and surgical procedures. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the primary outcome.

RESULTS: Of the 40,547 patients analyzed, 19,869 were in the intervention group and 20,678 in the control group. The PSIM rate was 9.2% in the invention group, and 9.4% in the control group, with an odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.05) for the intervention group. This finding remained consistent across various subgroups based on diagnoses, hospital levels, and ventilation types.

CONCLUSIONS: In modern operating rooms equipped with standard, midrange airflow ventilation systems, the addition of wall-mounted plasma air purifiers did not reduce the PSIM rate after orthopedic surgery. 

Background: Lisfranc injuries are potentially severe but relatively uncommon. Limited epidemiological data regarding Lisfranc injuries of the midfoot are available. This study aimed to describe the injury's epidemiology, injury mechanism, and primary treatment.

Methods: An observational register study examined all Lisfranc injuries registered in the Swedish Fracture Register from 2013 to 2022. Data on sex, age, date of injury, injury type, injury mechanism, and primary treatment were analysed.

Results: Some 2084 Lisfranc injuries in 2079 patients (54 % men) were included in the study. The mean age at injury was 43 (18-92, SD 17.3) years for men and 49 (18-96, SD 17.4) for women. One of five cases were caused by high-energy trauma, and the most common injury mechanism was a simple fall - tripping (31 %). Approximately 39 % of patients underwent operative treatment, with fixation using plates (51 %) being the prevailing choice of treatment. Primary arthrodesis was performed in 11 % of the operatively treated cases.

Conclusions: Lisfranc injuries are the consequence of a broad spectrum of injury mechanisms, are primarily induced by low-energy trauma and found in all age groups in adults. The majority of Lisfranc injuries are treated non-operatively. This comprehension can aid in accurate diagnosis and management in everyday clinical practice.Keywords: Lisfranc injury; Swedish Fracture Register; Trauma epidemiology.

BACKGROUND: Scapula fractures are relatively uncommon, accounting for <1% of all fractures and approximately 3-5% of shoulder girdle fractures. This study comprehensively describes the epidemiology, fracture classification, treatment, and mortality associated with scapula fractures within a large adult Swedish population.

METHODS: This observational study included all patients ≥18 years old at the time of injury with a scapula fracture (ICD S42.1) registered in the Swedish Fracture Register between March 2011 and June 2020. Variables studied were age, sex, and injury mechanism, including energy level, fracture classification, associated fractures, treatment, and mortality.

RESULTS: We included 3,930 patients (mean age 58 years, SD 18, 64% men) with 3,973 scapula fractures. Some 22% of the fractures were caused by high-energy trauma and 21% had at least one associated fracture. High energy-injuries were most common in glenoid neck (44%) and scapular body (35%) fractures. However, same-level falls were the most common cause of glenoid rim (62%) and intra-articular glenoid (55%) fractures. Clavicle fractures (9%) and proximal humerus fractures (5%) were the most commonly associated fractures. The most common fracture types were the glenoid rim (n=1,289, 32%) and scapular body (n=1,098, 28%) fractures. Nonoperative treatment was performed in 81% of patients. Glenoid rim and intra-articular glenoid fractures were treated operatively in over 30% of cases. The mortality rate for the whole cohort was 4% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS: Scapula fractures are predominately sustained by men. High energetic injuries and associated fractures are present in one in five patients. Nonoperative treatment is chosen in four of five patients, but for some fracture types one in three undergo surgery.

BACKGROUND: Total hip replacement (THR) is commonly used for active and lucid elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF). Historically, cemented stems have been favoured, demonstrating superior early outcomes. Controversy still exists regarding the use of cemented or uncemented stems in the most active group of patients with FNF and there is a need for extended follow-up studies to assess long-term outcome of cemented and uncemented stem results.

METHODS: A 4 and 10-year follow-up was conducted on a single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 65-79 years with an acute displaced FNF (Garden III-IV) were included, and surgeries were performed between 2009 and 2014. The study was terminated after an interim analysis indicated that the total number of early hip-related complications was substantially higher in the uncemented group. Baseline and follow-up assessments included hip-related complications, reoperations, health-related quality of life scores, Harris hip score and pain ratings.

RESULTS: In total, 69 patients were randomized. At 4 years, there were 8 complications in the uncemented group and 2 complications in the cemented groups. The uncemented group had several periprosthetic fractures and dislocations necessitating revisions in several cases. From 4 to 10 years, the cemented group showed a single periprosthetic fracture, while none occurred in the uncemented group. The total number of complications during the study period were 8 in the uncemented group and 3 in the cemented group. The median Harris hip score for the uncemented group remained consistent at 81 for both the 4- and 10-year follow-ups. In contrast, the cemented group showed scores of 92 and 93 at the respective 4- and 10-year follow-ups, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Health-related quality of life and pain ratings were similar between groups throughout the study.

CONCLUSION: Our study presents a 10-year follow-up of uncemented femoral stems in THR for elderly FNF patients. Our findings not only underscore the importance of cautious decision-making in selecting patients for uncemented implants, but also highlight that most patients suitable for THR would benefit from a cemented arthroplasty to avoid an increased risk of short-term complications.

OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the association between occupational biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA) in construction workers.

METHODS: Male construction workers (n=237 525), participating in a Swedish occupational surveillance programme between 1971 and 1993, were followed between 1997 and 2019. CMC1 OA diagnoses were identified through linkage with national medical registries. Job title, smoking status, height, weight and age were collected from the surveillance programme. A job exposure matrix (JEM) was developed with exposure estimates on biomechanical risk factors for each occupational group. Relative risk (RR) of CMC1 OA diagnosis was calculated using a Poisson regression model.

RESULTS: There was an increased risk of CMC1 OA for all biomechanical risk factors (RR range 1.3-1.5). Exposure-response patterns were seen for repetitive wrist flexion and extension (low: RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.59), moderate: 1.32 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.62), high: 1.45 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.75)), wrist extension (low: 1.31 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.59), moderate: 1.41 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.70) and heavy lifting (low: 1.13 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.38), moderate: 1.45 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.77), high: 1.50 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.82). Electricians (1.29 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.89)), concrete workers (1.31 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.67)), plumbers (1.37 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.76)), sheet-metal workers (1.58 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.10)), wood workers (1.66 (95% CI 1.36 to 2.03)), repairers (1.75 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.90)) and glass workers (2.21 (95% CI 1.42 to 3.44) had an increased risk of CMC1 OA compared with the reference group.

CONCLUSION: Wrist movements and hand loading were associated with CMC1 OA.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are increasing, particularly Vancouver B2 fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are more frequently used in comparison to the traditional stem revision to deal with these complex fractures. This observational study aims to compare the outcomes of ORIF versus stem revision in the treatment of Vancouver B2.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, from 2008 to 2022, including 157 patients (mean age 83.4 ± 7.0 years, 59% females) with a surgically treated Vancouver B2 fractures with an intact bone-cement interface. The study assessed the immediate and long-term outcomes of ORIF versus stem revision, examining post-operative complications, reoperation rates, and implant survivorship.

RESULTS: Among the 157 patients, 37 were treated with ORIF and 120 with stem revision. The ORIF group, which consisted of older patients and had a higher prevalence of cognitive dysfunction, experienced no hip-related adverse events. In contrast, the revision group had a 17.8% incidence of adverse events. Mortality within 90 days was significantly higher in the ORIF group (24%) compared to the revision group (4%) (p = 0.0007). One-year mortality was also higher in the ORIF group (32%) than in the revision group (15%) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS: ORIF presents as a viable option for managing Vancouver B2 fractures in the proximity of a polished tapered stem when anatomical reduction is possible. The less invasive surgery provides potential advantages in patient outcomes and resource utilization. Further research is warranted to aid in the development of treatment guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence of stroke in the first year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS: The study included 64,179 Swedish National Spine Register (Swespine) patients who underwent surgery for LSS between 2001 and 2020. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of stroke within the first year after surgery, as documented in the Swedish Stroke Register. The incidence was quantified as the number of strokes per 1,000 surgeries within a defined period, inclusive of the incidence rate (number of strokes/100,000 person-years). An adjusted Cox regression model was used to analyse whether age, sex, smoking, or surgery with implants further increased the risk of stroke.

RESULTS: In the first year after surgery, 426 patients (0.66%) developed a stroke. The risk of stroke was highest during the first 30 days (n=72, 0.11%). Stroke incidence was 1.1/1,000 surgeries during the first 30 days and 6.6/1,000 surgeries during the first year after surgery. The incidence rate during the initial 30 days was 1,394 strokes per 100,000 person-years, while the incidence rate during the first year was 660 strokes per 100,000 person-years. Smoking (hazard ratio [HR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.52), age 65-74 years (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.91-3.67), and age ≥75 years (HR, 6.04; 95% CI, 4.42-8.25) further increased the risk of stroke.

CONCLUSION: The incidence of stroke after LSS surgery was the highest during the first 30 days. However, the absolute number of strokes was small. The risk of stroke could be of minor concern for most of the patients even if older age and smoking were identified as risk factors.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we have shown that a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) compared to a conventional polyethylene cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a slightly higher proximal migration but significantly lower wear rates up to 2 years after surgery. In this follow-up study we investigated the same cohort at 6 years.

METHODS: This was a double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial on patients with osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 66 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the conventional polyethylene cup or the VEPE cup in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was proximal implant migration of the cup measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Secondary endpoints included wear rate of the cup and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM).

RESULTS: At the 6-year follow-up, 25 patients (11 controls, 14 VEPE) were available for RSA measurements, and we found no statistically significant difference in proximal migration between the VEPE and control groups. The wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group compared to controls, 0.03 mm/year and 0.07 mm/year, respectively with a mean difference 0.04 mm, (95% CI, 0.02-0.06 mm). There were no cup revisions and no difference in PROM between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on our 6-year results, the VEPE group exhibited no statistical or clinically relevant difference compared to the control group, and the wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group. The use of a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked cup is a good option in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).

METHODS: 1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.

RESULTS: The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.

CONCLUSION: Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.

Purpose: To assess the possibility of using Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) specifically in the context of orthopaedic trauma surgery by questions posed to ChatGPT and to evaluate responses (correctness, completeness and adaptiveness) by orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

Methods: ChatGPT (GPT-4 of 12 May 2023) was asked to address 34 common orthopaedic trauma surgery-related questions and generate responses suited to three target groups: patient, nonorthopaedic medical doctor and expert orthopaedic surgeon. Three orthopaedic trauma surgeons independently assessed ChatGPT's responses by using a three-point response scale with a response range between 0 and 2, where a higher number indicates better performance (correctness, completeness and adaptiveness).

Results: A total of 18 (52.9%) of all responses were assessed to be correct (2.0) for the patient target group, while 22 (64.7%) and 24 (70.5%) of the responses were determined to be correct for nonorthopaedic medical doctors and expert orthopaedic surgeons, respectively. Moreover, a total of 18 (52.9%), 25 (73.5%) and 28 (82.4%) of the responses were assessed to be complete (2.0) for patients, nonorthopaedic medical doctors and expert orthopaedic surgeons, respectively. The average adaptiveness was 1.93, 1.95 and 1.97 for patients, nonorthopaedic medical doctors and expert orthopaedic surgeons, respectively.

Conclusion: The study results indicate that ChatGPT can yield valuable and overall correct responses in the context of orthopaedic trauma surgery across different target groups, which encompassed patients, nonorthopaedic medical surgeons and expert orthopaedic surgeons. The average correctness scores, completeness levels and adaptiveness values indicated the ability of ChatGPT to generate overall correct and complete responses adapted to the target group.