Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, E-ISSN 2624-9634, Vol. 7, article id 1688667Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: A predominant portion of current Positive Energy District (PED) projects focuses on technical advancements, often neglecting non-technical aspects, which can hinder a just energy transition. This raises the question: How can PEDs be assessed to ensure a just, inclusive, and context-sensitive energy transition beyond technical solutions?
Methods: This study develops a cohesive approach that embeds the multiscale, multisectoral, multi-component, and multi-actor nature of PED development. A multi-criteria PED Matrix was created and refined using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and expert feedback to evaluate and benchmark PEDs across eight dimensions: social, governance, technical, process, environmental, legal, financial, and managerial.
Results: Five European pilot cases (in Austria, Sweden, and Türkiye) were assessed using the matrix, revealing context-specific strengths and capacity-building needs and enabling cross-case learning and comparison.
Discussion and conclusion: The PED Matrix supports self-assessment and co-design processes, helping local stakeholders identify weaknesses, required competencies, and lessons from other PED-related cases, promoting inclusive and context-sensitive energy transitions.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2025
Keywords
Positive Energy Districts, PED Matrix, self-assessment scoring system, collaboration pathways, quadruple helix
National Category
Energy Systems Environmental Studies in Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-246848 (URN)10.3389/frsc.2025.1688667 (DOI)2-s2.0-105024189717 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, P2022-01000
2025-11-252025-11-252025-12-15Bibliographically approved