Umeå University's logo

Background: Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE).

Objective: To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results: A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower.

Conclusions: Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

Background: subperception (paresthesia-free) dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is increasingly used for focal neuropathic pain, but sham-controlled evidence remains limited. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial with enriched enrollment design in established DRG-stimulation responders.

Methods: In this single-center trial, adults with chronic peripheral neuropathic or nociplastic pain with implanted DRG system and sustained response (≥50% pain reduction for ≥3 months on stable stimulation settings and medication) were randomized 1:1 to active→sham or sham→active stimulation. Participants completed two 5-day treatment periods separated by a 24-hour washout with stimulation off. Active stimulation was delivered at 90% of the perception threshold, and sham was stimulation off. The primary outcome was median pain intensity on a 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) domains. Analyses used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Hodges-Lehmann estimates.

Results: In 20 randomized patients, pain intensity was lower during active than sham stimulation (median NRS 3.0 (IQR 2.0–4.0) vs 6.0 (IQR 4.0–7.0); Hodges-Lehmann median difference, −2.5; 95% CI −3.0 to −2.0; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction and all PGIC domains favored active stimulation. Two participants terminated one treatment period early per prespecified criteria; available data were retained. No serious or device-related adverse events were reported.

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a safe and effective therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) in selected patients. However, various side effects such as paraesthesia, diplopia, ataxia, worsened akinesia, emotional changes, dysarthria, and muscle contractions can occur due to the current spread to the adjacent structures during the STN-DBS programming sessions. Muscle contractions result from the corticospinal and corticobulbar side effects, which can manifest due to the current spread to the pyramidal tract during DBS programming. Here, we report a case of tongue-twisting movement as a unique corticobulbar side effect of the STN-DBS programming in a patient with PD.

Background: The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated “primary” dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.

Objective: The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.

Methods: A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.

Results: The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.

Conclusions: We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.

To compare awake and asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Essential Tremor (ET), we conducted this retrospective cohort study of patients consecutively operated with DBS targeting the caudal Zona incerta (cZi). 37 underwent surgery awake and 55 asleep. Tremor before surgery and on/off stimulation one year after surgery were evaluated using the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS). Procedural time, electrode localization, stimulation parameters and adverse events were noted and compared. ETRS scores were similar at baseline between the groups except for contralateral arm tremor, which was slightly worse in the awake group. Total ETRS, contralateral arm tremor and activities of daily living scores showed no significant difference between the groups on-stimulation at one-year follow-up. Compared to the awake group, the asleep group had shorter procedural time and lower stimulation parameters. There were no intracranial haemorrhages nor surgery site-infections. Both groups showed a good improvement of tremor at one-year follow-up. Image-guided DBS surgery targeting the cZi enables safe and efficient asleep surgery for ET.