Umeå University's logo

Background: Complementary and alternativemedicine (CAM) is widely used by patients with cancer. Research indicates that the use of CAM is more prevalent in rural areas compared to urban areas. There is currently a lack of information regarding the scope and specifics of CAM use among patients in Sweden, particularly in rural areas. The aim of this study was to estimate the extent and characteristics of CAM use among cancer patients in the rural areas of Region Gävleborg.

Methods: A total of 631 questionnaires were sent out, and 376 of those were returned, corresponding to a response rate of 59.6%. Oncology patients received questionnaires at their initial appointment for curative care at Gävle Hospital's Department of Oncology. When enrolling in palliative outpatient care in their homes, palliative patients were sought out. Standard descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of the respondents. To determine odds ratios and potential factors (age, gender, diagnosis, and education) affecting CAM use after cancer diagnosis, a multivariable logistic model was constructed.

Results: Based on clinical observations, the authors' hypothesis that CAM use is particularly common in small towns in the Hälsingland region was verified in this study. This was particularly pronounced among younger people and residents of small towns in the province of Halsingland. The higher level of CAM use appears to apply to both men and women.

Conclusions: CAM appears to be used more frequently by patients residing in rural areas. It is crucial that care providers enquire about all of the patient's health-seeking activities. Further research is needed on the usage of CAM in rural areas and the potential cultural influences contributing to CAM use. From a sociological standpoint, it is crucial to draw attention to the fact that CAM use may be more prevalent in certain rural areas, particularly in centralized societies where it is more difficult to access healthcare in remote regions.

Background: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients is widespread. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the extent and details of patient CAM use in Sweden, especially in rural Sweden. The aim of this study was to estimate the extent and characteristics of CAM use among cancer patients in Region Gävleborg. Methods: A total of 631 questionnaires were distributed to which 376 responses were registered, yielding a response rate of 59.6%. Questionnaires were distributed to oncology patients at their first visit for curative treatment at the Department of Oncology, Gävle Hospital. Palliative patients were recruited at their first visit and during enrollment in palliative outpatient care in their own homes. The characteristics of the respondents were presented with standard descriptive statistics. A multivariable logistic model was fitted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and identify potential predictors (Age, Gender, Education, Diagnosis) of CAM use post-cancer diagnosis. Results: 54% of all participants reported lifetime CAM use, 34% reported CAM use post-diagnosis. The most common CAM methods used after diagnosis are vitamins, health food preparations, herbal teas, prayer and dietary methods. The most common source of information reported is family and friends. Almost 70% of those who used CAM after their diagnosis stated that they did not discuss their use with healthcare professionals. Most patients reported that they would like some CAM modalities to be offered within conventional care regardless of their own CAM use. Conclusions: The use of CAM is common among patients with cancer in the region of Gävleborg, and previous studies show a similar use in Sweden in general. Based on the widespread use of CAM and patient interest in discussing CAM use with healthcare professionals, greater attention and focus should be placed on creating a basis for this dialogue. If we, as healthcare professionals, are to emphasise our commitment to providing patient-centred care, we must acknowledge that patients use CAM and are seeking a dialogue about CAM use in their care.

Background: Results from studies addressing age-related patterns of cancer care have found evidence of unjustified differences in management between younger and older patients.

Methods: We examined associations between age and clinical presentation, management and mortality in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2016. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidity and other factors that may have affected management decisions and outcomes.

Results: The study population encompassed 40,026 patients with NSCLC. Stage at diagnosis did not differ between age groups ≤ 84. The diagnostic intensity was similar in age groups <80 years. In patients with stage IA–IIB disease and PS 0–2, surgery was more common in the youngest age groups and decreased with increasing age, and was rarely performed in those ≥ 85 years. The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) increased with age (≤69 years 5.4%; ≥85 years 35.8%). In patients with stage IIIA disease and PS 0–2, concurrent chemoradiotherapy was more common in younger patients (≤69 years 55.3%; ≥85 years 2.2%). In stage IA–IIIA disease, no major differences in treatment-related mortality was observed. In stage IIIB–IV and PS 0–2, chemotherapy was more common in patients <80 years. However, 58.1% of patients 80–84 years and 30.3% ≥ 85 years received treatment. In stage IA–IIIA, overall and cause-specific survival decreased with increasing age. No age-differences in survival were observed in patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC.

Conclusion: Treatments were readily given to older patients with metastatic disease, but to a lesser degree to those with early stage disease. Significant differences in cause specific survival were observed in early, but not late stage disease. Our findings underscore the importance of individualized assessment of health status and life expectancy. Our results indicate that older patients with early stage lung cancer to a higher extent should be considered for curative treatment.

Objectives: While studies have found lower cancer risks and better cancer survival in immigrant populations, it is debated whether cancer care is offered on equal terms to all residents regardless of background. Our aim was to study patterns of care and outcomes in immigrants in a country with a tax-financed universal health care system.

Material and methods: We used a population-based database to compare clinical presentation, management and mortality between Swedish-born and immigrant patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: We identified 40,075 patients diagnosed with NSCLC of which 84% were born in Sweden, 7% in Nordic and 9% in Non-Nordic countries. Non-Nordic immigrants were to a higher extent male, smokers, younger at diagnosis, had a better performance status and a higher educational level. No differences were seen regarding comorbidity burden or stage at diagnosis. Non-Nordic immigrants more often underwent positron emission tomography (PET) (aHR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19-1.45) and were more often discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.17-1.44). There were no differences in treatment modalities following adjustment for age, with the exception of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIA disease which was more common in Non-Nordic immigrants (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03-1.74). Both overall and cause specific survival in non-metastatic disease were higher among Non- Nordic immigrants. Overall mortality in stage I-II: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90 and stage IIIA: HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.86. Following full adjustments, cause-specific mortality in stage I-II was aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98.

Conclusion: Taken together, only minor differences in management and outcomes were observed between Swedish-born and immigrant patients. We conclude that lung cancer care is offered on equal terms. If anything, outcomes were better in Non-Nordic immigrants with early stage NSCLC.

Background/Aim: Previous studies of nodenegative oral squamous cell carcinoma have shown a benefit of elective neck dissection compared to observation. Evidence for radiotherapy as single-modality elective treatment of the node-negative neck is so far lacking. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective material of 420 early-stage oral cancers from 2000 to 2016, overall survival, disease-free survival, and regional relapse-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: At five years, overall survival was 59.7%, disease-specific survival was 77.2%, and regional relapse-free survival was 83.5%. Among those with adjuvant treatment of the neck after surgery of T1-T2 tumours during 2009-2016, regional relapse-free survival at five years was 85.7% for elective radiotherapy of the neck and 87.4% for elective neck dissection. Conclusion: Elective radiotherapy to the neck with a modern technique and adequate dose might be an alternative to neck dissection for patients with early-stage oral squamous cell cancer.

The purpose of our study was to investigate time trends in treatment pattern and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Utilizing Swedish nationwide registers, we identified all Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs and followed them from diagnosis (2010-2015) until death or end of observation (2016). Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to test associations of patient-, tumor-related factors with OS. Of 9,992 Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients, the 1,419 (14%) who initiated EGFR TKI treatment during observation were younger (median age 68 vs. 71 years), less >= 1 comorbidities (34% vs. 46%), more often female (59% vs. 47%), Stage IV (89% vs. 85%) and adenocarcinoma (85% vs. 66%) compared to non-TKI treated patients. After TKI initiation, 7% (n = 100) of the patients switched, 4% (n = 62) rechallenged a TKI treatment, 65% (n = 919) discontinued and 24% (n = 338) had died. A more recent diagnosis demonstrated shorter time to EGFR TKI initiation, prolonged treatment length and longer median OS (15.3 months 2010-2011; 14.4 months 2012-2013; 18.6 months 2014-2015). Prognostic factors for longer OS when treated with EGFR TKIs were younger age, adenocarcinoma, less advanced clinical stage and less comorbid disease. In conclusion, during the observation period, survival improved for EGFR TKI treated NSCLC patients, as did the accessibility for targeted therapies for these patients.

Objectives: We examined associations between educational level and clinical presentation, patterns of management and mortality in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Sweden, a country with a National Health Care System.

Materials and Methods: We identified 39,671 patients with a NSCLC diagnosis 2002–2016 in Lung Cancer Data Base Sweden (LCBaSe), a population-based research database. In analyses adjusted for comorbidity and other prognostic factors, odds Ratios (OR) and hazard Ratios (HR) were estimated to examine associations between patients’ educational level and aspects of management and mortality.

Results: Stage at diagnosis and waiting times did not differ between educational groups. In multivariable analysis, the likelihood to undergo PET/CT and assessment in a multidisciplinary team setting were higher in patients with high compared to low education (aOR 1.14; CI 1.05–1.23 and aOR 1.22; CI 1.14–1.32, respectively). In patients with early stage IA-IIB disease, the likelihood to undergo stereotactic radiotherapy was elevated in patients with high education (aOR 1.40; CI 1.03–1.91). Both all-cause (aHR 0.86; CI 0.77-0.92) and cause-specific mortality (aHR 0.83; CI 0.74-0.92) was lower in patients with high compared to low education in early stage disease (IA-IIB). In higher stage NSCLC no differences were observed. Patterns were similar in separate assessments stratified by sex and histopathology.

Conclusions: While stage at diagnosis and waiting times did not differ between educational groups, we found socioeconomic differences in diagnostic intensity, multidisciplinary team assessment, stereotactic radiotherapy and mortality in patients with NSCLC. These findings may in part reflect social gradients in implementation and use of novel diagnostic and treatment modalities. Our findings underscore the need for improved adherence to national guidelines.

Background/Aim: The main objective of this study was to evaluate if there was an increased incidence of brain tumours between years 1980-2012, a time period when mobile phone usage has increased substantially. Materials and Methods: From the Swedish Cancer Registry, cases of meningiomas, low-grade gliomas (LGG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG) were identified in patients between 1980-2012. Direct age-standardised incidence rates were used to calculate incidence trends over time. Results: A total of 13,441 cases of meningiomas, 12,259 cases of high-grade gliomas and 4,555 cases of LGG were reported to the register during the study period. The results suggest that there may be a negative development in the trend for LGG of -0,016 cases per 100,000 and year, corresponding to a mean reduction of approximately 1% per year. Conclusion: The present study was not able to demonstrate an increased incidence of glioma during the past 30 years in Sweden.