Umeå University's logo

Objectives: FDG PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality for nodal staging in rectal cancer; however, its role remains to be defined. We aimed to assess its performance in detecting mesorectal malignant lymph node involvement based on both metabolic and morphological criteria at PET/MRI versus at MRI alone.

Materials & methods: Sixty-five patients (median age 70 years, IQR 61–74; 39 men) were examined with FDG PET/MRI followed by individual anatomical matching of mesorectal nodal structures between histopathology and MRI. PET N-stage assessment was evaluated using FDG uptake over background levels, MRI N-stage by the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus criteria and PET/MRI was evaluated using both in combination. Histopathological assessment served as gold standard, and the accuracy of identifying malignancy at both nodal and patient level was calculated. Furthermore, FDG PET/MRI and MRI using ESGAR criteria for nodal restaging after neoadjuvant treatment were also evaluated.

Results: In total, 835 nodal structures were matched, of which 104 were malignant (12%); among these, 59/104 (57%) were histopathologically proven lymph node metastases. MRI alone yielded a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 85% for nodal malignancy, while the corresponding estimates for FDG-avidity gave a 75% sensitivity and 79% specificity. The different combined FDG PET/MRI criteria for malignancy were evaluated: FDG-positivity or malignancy according to ESGAR criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 76%; while the combination of FDG-positivity and malignancy according to ESGAR criteria achieved a specificity of 90%.

Conclusion: Compared to MRI alone, FDG PET/MRI offers potential added value by reducing the risk of nodal understaging.

As part of the preparation for an intervention campaign in Democratic Republic (DR) of Congo, several full-scale pilot experimental tests were conducted in September 2024 at a hospital north of Gothenburg, Sweden. To simulate an operating room in a basic setting, a staff room in a section for surgical emergency care was used. Microbial airborne contamination levels were studied using traditional agar plates and active microbiological air sampling. Additionally, airborne particle counts were monitored. The tests were performed under simulated surgery conditions, considering the number of people, movements, clothing quality, room size, and furniture. Three types of clothing sets were tested: cotton clothes, disposable protective clothing, and the latter with airtight footwear added. By alternately turning room air cleaners (fan-filter-units) and a supply air fan on and off, their impact on air quality was evaluated.

The air cleaners reduced particle content by approximately 10 to 70 times, depending on the particle diameter, and the bacterial content decreased by approximately 10 to 15 times. The results clearly demonstrated the importance of surgical clothing for the level of airborne bacteria in the room. Further improvement was observed when the feet were covered.

Aim: Palliative rectal cancer patients typically retain their primary tumour, as trials have concluded no survival benefit of tumour resection in non-curative patients. This patient group is understudied regarding the natural course of the remaining tumour, particularly concerning the need of surgical management.

Method: This was a retrospective study on rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2020 in Region Västerbotten, Sweden. Data were obtained from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and chart review. Patients were excluded if treated with curative intent, underwent primary tumour resection, had a synchronous colorectal cancer, had locally recurrent colorectal cancer, or refused treatment. Patients were followed from diagnosis until death or end of follow-up. Indications for palliative treatment, tumour-related complications and surgical and oncological management were investigated, with a stratified analysis for study period and patient age.

Results: Some 156 patients remained after applying exclusion criteria. The majority had metastasized and incurable disease (76%). Almost half suffered local complications (44%) and 48% underwent surgical intervention, due to the unremoved primary tumour. Tumour perforation occurred in 7% with a significantly higher risk in patients aged ≤75 years (p = 0.009). Bowel obstruction afflicted 23%, while 40% underwent stoma diversion. Almost half received chemotherapy (48%) and radiotherapy (42%), respectively.

Conclusion: Rectal cancer patients with an unremoved primary tumour face a substantial risk of local complications, often necessitating surgical intervention. Therefore, the benefits of surgical resection should be carefully considered, especially for patients with a longer estimated survival. Further research is needed to accurately identify patients where tumour removal might be beneficial.

Background: Postoperative death measured 30 days after surgery is a conventional quality metric, whereas intervals up to 90 days are increasingly used, although data-driven time windows have scarcely been investigated.

Methods: The Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients subjected resection for colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2020. All patients were followed up until 180 days after surgery. A join-point statistical hazard model was used to model a declining hazard to a transition point, followed by a stable death rate. This method was subsequently applied to describe postoperative deaths for the entire cohort and subgroups according to tumour location (colon and rectum).

Results: Some 56 096 patients electively operated on for colorectal cancer during the study interval were included, with a 30-day and 90-day fatality of 805 (1.43%) and 1458 (2.60%) patients respectively. The derived postoperative fatality window, after which the death rate transitioned to a stable rate, was 23.8 (95% c.i. 21.5 to 28.2) days after surgery. There was no significant difference in the time window between rectal cancer (22.9 days; 95% c.i. 15.1 to 28.4) and colon cancer (27.3 days; 95% c.i. 21.4 to 31.8) patients (P = 0.455). However, postoperative fatality time windows were extended in patients aged at least 80 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists’ grade III or IV.

Conclusion: The traditional postoperative time window of 30 days was confirmed to be an appropriate metric in elective colorectal cancer surgery when evaluated with a hazards-based statistical framework. Importantly, this time window is influenced by older age and advanced co-morbidity, which could prompt increased vigilance for these patient groups.

Purpose: To evaluate current MRI-based criteria for malignancy in mesorectal nodal structures in rectal cancer.

Method: Mesorectal nodal structures identified on baseline MRI as lymph nodes were anatomically compared to their corresponding structures histopathologically, reported as lymph nodes, tumour deposits or extramural venous invasion. All anatomically matched nodal structures from patients with primary surgery and all malignant nodal structures from patients with neoadjuvant treatment were included. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate the morphological criteria irregular margin, round shape, heterogeneous signal and nodal size, as well as the combined 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus criteria, with histopathological nodal status as the gold standard.

Results: In total, 458 matched nodal structures were included from 46 patients (mean age, 67.7 years ± 1.5 [SD], 27 men), of which 19 received neoadjuvant treatment. The strongest associations in the univariable model were found for short-axis diameter ≥ 5 mm (OR 21.43; 95% CI: 4.13–111.29, p < 0.001) and heterogeneous signal (OR 9.02; 95% CI: 1.33–61.08, p = 0.024). Only size remained significant in multivariable analysis (OR 12.32; 95% CI: 2.03–74.57, p = 0.006). When applying the ESGAR consensus criteria to create a binary classification of nodal status, the OR of malignant outcome for nodes with positive ESGAR was 8.23 (95% CI: 2.15–31.50, p = 0.002), with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 85%, respectively.

Conclusion: The results confirm the role of morphological and size criteria in predicting lymph node metastases. However, the current criteria might not be accurate enough for nodal staging.

More than 5 billion humans cannot access essential surgery if needed. Surgery was for a long time not a part of the global health agenda, generally considered a luxury. However, the realization that a large proportion of the global burden of disease can be reduced by surgery has gained momentum. The publication of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and the Disease Control Priorities volume on surgery, along with the WHO resolution on access to essential and emergency surgical care, has been pivotal in this paradigm shift. Access to surgery is in many settings hampered by a mix of lack of leadership, skilled workforce, equipment, and financial risk protection for patients, to name a few. Importantly, the provision of surgery requires comprehensive health systems which, once established, allow for numerous other health interventions. This cannot be achieved without partnerships, responsible leadership and good governance that prioritizes health care in general and surgery in particular.

Background: Electrolyte disturbances and dehydration are common after anterior resection for rectal cancer with a defunctioning loop ileostomy. High-quality population-based studies on the impact of a defunctioning loop ileostomy on renal failure are lacking.

Methods: This was a nationwide observational study, based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry of patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2008 and 2016, with follow-up until 2017. Patients with severe co-morbidity, with age greater than 80 years, and with pre-existing renal failure were excluded. Loop ileostomy at index surgery constituted exposure, while a diagnosis of renal failure was the outcome. Acute and chronic events were analysed separately. Inverse probability weighting with adjustment for confounding derived from a causal diagram was employed. Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent c.i. are reported.

Results: A total of 5355 patients were eligible for analysis. At 5-year follow-up, all renal failure events (acute and chronic) were 7.2 per cent and 3.3 per cent in the defunctioning stoma and no stoma groups respectively. In the weighted analysis, a HR of 11.59 (95 per cent c.i. 5.68 to 23.65) for renal failure in ostomates was detected at 1 year, with the largest effect from acute renal failure (HR 24.04 (95 per cent c.i. 8.38 to 68.93)). Later follow-up demonstrated a similar pattern, but with smaller effect sizes.

Conclusion: Patients having a loop ileostomy in combination with anterior resection for rectal cancer are more likely to have renal failure, especially early after surgery. Strategies are needed, such as careful fluid management protocols, and further research into alternative stoma types or reduction in stoma formation.

Aim: The aim of this work was to investigate whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could be beneficial or harmful when used perioperatively for colorectal cancer patients, as inflammation may affect occult disease and anastomotic healing. Method: This is a protocol-based retrospective cohort study on colorectal cancer patients operated on between 2007 and 2012 at 21 hospitals in Sweden. NSAID exposure was retrieved from postoperative analgesia protocols, while outcomes and patient data were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Older or severely comorbid patients, as well as those with disseminated or nonradically operated tumours were excluded. Multivariable regression with adjustment for confounders was performed, estimating hazard ratios (HRs) for long-term outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for short-term outcomes, including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Some 6945 patients remained after exclusion, of whom 3996 were treated at hospitals where a NSAID protocol was in place. No association was seen between NSAIDs and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87–1.09). However, a reduction in cancer recurrence was detected (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95), which remained significant when stratifying into locoregional (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.97) and distant recurrences (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98). Anastomotic leakage was less frequent (HR 0.69%, 95% CI 0.51–0.94) in the NSAID-exposed, mainly due to a risk reduction in colo-rectal and ileo-rectal anastomoses (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.68). Conclusion: There was no association between NSAID exposure and recurrence-free survival, but an association with reduced cancer recurrence and the rate of anastomotic leakage was detected, which may depend on tumour site and anastomotic location.