Open this publication in new window or tab >>Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden; Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology.
Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology (IGP), Science for Life Laboratories, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, WA, Perth, Australia.
Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Annals of Surgery, ISSN 0003-4932, E-ISSN 1528-1140, Vol. 282, no 1, p. 100-107Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: To investigate overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of first-line isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) compared to best alternative care for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases.
Background: Approximately half of the patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease, most commonly in the liver, and systemic treatment options are limited. IHP is a locoregional therapy with high response rates but with an unclear effect on OS.
Methods: In this phase III randomized controlled multicenter trial (the SCANDIUM trial), patients with previously untreated isolated uveal melanoma liver metastases were included between 2013 and 2021, with at least 24 months of follow-up. The planned accrual was 90 patients randomized 1:1 to receive a one-time treatment with IHP or best alternative care. Crossover to IHP was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the 24-month OS rate, with the hypothesis of a treatment effect leading to a 50% OS rate in the IHP group compared to 20% in the control group. HRQOL was measured by the EuroQol 5-domains 3-levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire over 12 months.
Results: The intention-to-treat population included 87 patients randomized to the IHP group [43 patients; 41 (89%) received IHP] or the control group (44 patients). The control group received chemotherapy (49%), immunotherapy (39%), or localized interventions (9%). In the intention-to-treat population, the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months in the IHP group compared with 3.3 months in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.36). The 24-month OS rate was 46.5% in the IHP group versus 29.5% in the control group (P=0.12). The median OS was 21.7 months versus 17.6 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.37-1.10). EQ-5D-3L showed a sustained high health status for the IHP group over 12 months, compared to a deteriorating trend in the control group.
Conclusions: For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma, IHP offers high response rates translating to a benefit in progression-free survival including a trend of better HRQOL compared to the control group. However, the primary endpoint of OS at 24 months was not met.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2025
Keywords
isolated hepatic perfusion, liver metastases, locoregional treatment, melphalan, uveal melanoma
National Category
Surgery Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-242161 (URN)10.1097/SLA.0000000000006255 (DOI)001507917000016 ()38420778 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105008483766 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Signe and Olof Wallenius FoundationStiftelsen Assar Gabrielssons fondKnut and Alice Wallenberg FoundationWilhelm och Martina Lundgrens VetenskapsfondSjöberg FoundationSwedish Cancer SocietySwedish Research Council
2025-07-142025-07-142025-07-14Bibliographically approved