Open this publication in new window or tab >>Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine. Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Stroke Imaging Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Stroke Imaging Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: European Stroke Journal, ISSN 2396-9873, E-ISSN 2396-9881, Vol. 10, no 4, p. 1320-1327Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a significant improvement in the care of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, but only a small portion of patients receive treatment. Our aim was to analyze EVT implementation in Sweden according to a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) for procedural and implementational effectiveness.
Methods: A nationwide prospective registry-based observational study using data from 2018, 2020, and 2022 from the Swedish quality registries for stroke care (Riksstroke and EVAS) and official population statistics. Effectiveness was analyzed using a set of predefined KPIs. To describe procedural and implementation effectiveness in a single comprehensible measure population success rate was derived by multiplying the EVT rate with successful recanalization.
Results: Between 2018 and 2022 EVTs in Sweden increased from 874 to 1474 procedures per year. Correspondingly, the EVT rate (EVT/AIS) increased from 4.1% to 7.3%. Implementation was heterogenous with a six-fold difference between the highest and lowest regions. EVT rates were generally highest in regions with comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). Procedural effectiveness were similar between all CSCs. The population success-rate increased from 3.4% to 6.4% during the period with large differences between CSCs (range 3.4%–12.4%, in 2022).
Conclusions: By including KPIs for procedural and implementational effectiveness, it is possible to evaluate EVT implementation for the entire stroke population, which is the ultimate objective for healthcare. The population success-rate is capturing procedural implementation effectiveness in a single measure comprehensible for all stake holders and facilitate comparisons over time and between regions, even between regions with different stroke incidence.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2025
Keywords
Acute ischemic stroke, effectiveness, endovascular thrombectomy, implementation, key performance indicators (KPIs)
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-242187 (URN)10.1177/23969873251347098 (DOI)001509879200001 ()40524387 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105009748856 (Scopus ID)
Funder
The Crafoord FoundationVinnova
2025-07-142025-07-142025-12-11Bibliographically approved