Umeå University's logo

BACKGROUND: Metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (MD-SBRT) has shown promise in retrospective and phase II studies for oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. However, prospective randomized phase III data-particularly in newly diagnosed cases and in combination with androgen deprivation therapy and next-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors-are limited. The METRO trial investigates the addition of MD-SBRT to standard of care in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT-detected oligometastatic disease.

METHODS: METRO is a multicentre, double arm, open-label, phase III randomized trial comparing MD-SBRT plus standard of care versus standard of care alone in patients with one to three PSMA PET/CT-detected distant metastases. The PSMA-RADS scale is used to support inclusion, and only patients with PSMA-RADS 4 or 5 lesions in bone or non-regional lymph nodes are eligible.

Standard of care includes time-limited androgen deprivation therapy and/or androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, as well as local radiotherapy to the prostate or prostate bed. Patients are stratified by disease type (synchronous or metachronous) and metastasis location (lymph node/bone). The primary endpoint is biochemical progression-free survival; secondary endpoints include time to castration-resistant prostate cancer, adverse events, and health-related quality of life.

The intervention is prescribed either 30 Gy in 3 fractions or 40 Gy in 5 fractions and delivered by stereotactic treatment principles.

DISCUSSION: The METRO trial investigates the added value of combining MD-SBRT with time-limited intensified hormonal therapy in both synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer staged by PSMA‑PET/CT. The use of the PSMA-RADS scale for inclusion ensures a standardized and reproducible approach for patient selection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04983095.

Objective: Accurate staging of uterine cervical cancer (UCC) is crucial for treatment guidance and prognostic predictions. This study investigated the added value of conventional diagnostic imaging for different histopathological subtypes of UCC by comparing clinical staging according to International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging system (cFIGO) and radiological staging (rFIGO) with histopathological staging (pFIGO) as reference.

Methods: 26 consecutive patients with UCC from the retrospective part of the PRODIGYN study (ethical approval number 2022-04207-01; NCT05855941) were included in the present study. Data from study participants was collected from radiological and histopathological records 2016–2022 at the University hospital of Umeå. Staging was assessed according to the FIGO 2018 staging system. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient (κ) for calculation of agreement between cFIGO and rFIGO, and between rFIGO and pFIGO.

Results: With rFIGO staging, more advanced disease stages were found in 67 % (8/12 patients with known cFIGO). Poor agreement was found between cFIGO and rFIGO (κ =0.057) and between rFIGO and pFIGO (κ= 0169). Among the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) positive for human papilloma virus (HPV+), 67 % (4/6) were assigned a higher stage by rFIGO compared to cFIGO. For the single patients with HPV-negative SCC and HPV status unknown SCC, both were upstaged by rFIGO. In the case of adenocarcinomas, 67 % (2/3) of the patients were assigned a higher stage with rFIGO.

Conclusions: In primary staging of UCC, rFIGO leads to substantial up-staging compared to cFIGO, without obvious differences in subtypes.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of imaging-based biomarkers from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of malignant and borderline malignant ovarian tumours.

Methods: 195 consecutive patients with suspected primary epithelial ovarian cancer were included from the retrospective "Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynaecological Cancer" (PRODIGYN) study. The radiological stage, according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics system (rFIGO), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS-MRI) score, and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean) were investigated for prediction of ovarian malignancy, with histopathology as reference. The same imaging biomarkers were applied to the borderline tumour cohort (n = 33) to predict malignant/adverse features, such as micro-invasion.

Results: The rFIGO stage demonstrated high accuracy for ovarian malignancy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97–0.99). On lesion level, the sensitivity and specificity of the O-RADS-MRI score to predict ovarian malignancy, after adjusting for correlated data structure, was 1 (CI: 0.96–1) and 0.82 (CI: 0.70–0.90), respectively. The performance of ADC_mean to predict ovarian malignancy on lesion level was moderately high, with AUC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.68, 0.88). Discrimination of adverse features in borderline tumours was not improved.

Conclusions: rFIGO and O-RADS-MRI showed excellent performance and outperformed ADC_mean as predictive tools for ovarian malignancy but could not predict adverse features in borderline tumours.

Background: Accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for optimal treatment planning of prostate cancer. By combining functional and anatomical imaging, PSMA-PET/mpMRI offers a potential to improve lesion detection and enhance staging accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of lesion detection and local staging of prostate cancer using combined PSMA-PET/mpMRI compared to standalone mpMRI or PSMA-PET.

Results: Fifty-five patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were included. All patients underwent [68Ga]PSMA-PET/mpMRI prior to surgery. Whole-mount histopathology and surgical report served as reference standard. Two radiologists independently evaluated mpMRI, while two nuclear medicine physicians assessed PSMA-PET. For the PSMA-PET/mpMRI analysis, a consensus evaluation was performed by a new set of readers in two teams, each comprising one radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician. Lesion localization was reported based on the PI-RADS v2.1 sector map and compared to histopathology. Among 130 histopathologically confirmed lesions, mean detection rates were 38% (49.5/130) for PSMA-PET/mpMRI, 32% (41/130) for mpMRI and 32% (41/130) for PSMA-PET. For clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) (≥0.5 ml, ≥ISUP 2; 42 lesions), mean detection rates were 85% (35.5/42) for PSMA-PET/mpMRI, 75% (31.5/42) for mpMRI and 70% (29.5/42) for PSMA-PET. The mean false discovery rates were 8% (PSMA-PET/mpMRI), 15% (mpMRI) and 12% (PSMA-PET). The likelihood of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) were scored using a 5-point Likert scale, where scores of 1–3 were classified as negative and scores of 4–5 were considered positive. Sensitivity for EPE was 32% for PSMA-PET/mpMRI, 37% for mpMRI and 7% for PSMA-PET, with a specificity of 100%, 96% and 98%, respectively. For SVI, sensitivity was 50% for PSMA-PET/mpMRI and 38% for mpMRI and PSMA-PET, with a specificity of 100%, 95% and 97% respectively.

Conclusions: PSMA-PET/mpMRI provided higher and a more consistent performance in localized prostate cancer detection and staging without increasing false-positive findings.

BACKGROUND: In uterine cervical cancer (UCC), tumour staging is performed according to the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system, where imaging is incorporated, or the more generic Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) classification. With the technical development in diagnostic imaging, continuous prospective evaluation of the different imaging methods contributing to stage determination is warranted. The aims of this interim study were to (1) evaluate the performance of radiological FIGO (rFIGO) and T staging (rT) with 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (2[18F]-FDG)-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), compared to clinical FIGO (cFIGO) and T (cT) staging based on clinical examination and conventional imaging, in treatment-naïve UCC, and to (2) identify possible MRI biomarkers for early treatment response after radiotherapy.

METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with newly diagnosed UCC from the prospective PRODIGYN (Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynecological Cancer) study (ethical approval number 2022-04207-01; NCT05855941) were included. Study participants underwent 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI, and an additional MRI one week after radiotherapy. Agreement between rFIGO and cFIGO was analysed using Cohen's kappa. Differences in rFIGO between 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and added value of rFIGO for metastasis assessment was demonstrated with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS: In 2/10 patients, a higher stage was obtained with rFIGO compared to cFIGO, where presence of metastases led to upstaging. In 3/10, rFIGO was lower than cFIGO, and in 5/10 rFIGO and cFIGO were similar. Degree of agreement between rFIGO and cFIGO was poor, (κ = 0.091, p < 0.005) with 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and (κ = - 0.010, p > 0.05) with FDG/PET/MRI). There was no significant difference between 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI for rFIGO (p = 0.18), or rT stage assessment (p = 0.32). MRI-derived tumour volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were most affected on MRI one week after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that there is an added value of rFIGO staging with 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI compared to clinical examination and conventional radiology, for metastasis assessment in treatment-naïve UCC. In early treatment response evaluation with MRI, ADC and tumour volume may be predictive parameters of interest in future prognostic analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials, NCT05855941. Registered 02 May 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05855941?term=NCT05855941&rank=1 .

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The study aims to evaluate dosimetric properties of hypofractionated treatment plans integrating focal boost, using registered whole-mount histopathology (WMHP) as reference standard.

METHODS: Fifteen men from the PAMP trial (EudraCT: 2015-005046-55) were included. Participants had ≥ 1 ISUP Grade group ≥ 4 lesion and underwent [⁶⁸Ga]prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (PET/mpMRI) and [¹¹C]Acetate-PET/computed tomography before radical prostatectomy. Four radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes (GTVs) on PSMA-PET/mpMRI. Sixty treatment plans were optimized, one per GTV and patient. Prostate planning target volumes were prescribed 42.7 Gy in seven fractions, with a simultaneous GTV boost up to 49.0 Gy, prioritizing organs at risk (OARs). Digital WMHP provided Gleason grading and was co-registered with in-vivo imaging. Target coverage for GTVs and voxels sharing Gleason patterns (GPs) was assessed via dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Interobserver agreement in GTV-delineations was quantified with Fleiss' kappa.

RESULTS: The median GTV dose per plan (D50) ranged from 48.3 to 49.1 Gy. For voxels with the highest GP, D₅₀ was 42.9-49.2 Gy, exceeding 47.2 Gy in all except one plan. In lowest pattern voxels, D₅₀ was 42.5-49.3 Gy, and below 43.4 Gy in over half the plans. Significant positive correlations between Fleiss' kappa and DVH parameters appeared only for GP 5 regions, specifically for Fleiss' kappa and D₅₀ for two observers and the average D₅₀ across observers.

INTERPRETATION: The histologically confirmed tumor was only partially boosted. Regions with more aggressive disease received better coverage. These findings provide a rational for prioritizing OARs in treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: The delineation of intraprostatic lesions is vital for correct delivery of focal radiotherapy boost in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Errors in the delineation could translate into reduced tumour control and potentially increase the side effects. The purpose of this study is to compare PET-based delineation methods with histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 15 patients with confirmed high-risk PC intended for prostatectomy. [68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR was performed prior to surgery. Prostate lesions identified in histopathology were transferred to the in vivo [68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR coordinate system. Four radiation oncologists manually delineated intraprostatic lesions based on PET data. Various semi-automatic segmentation methods were employed, including absolute and relative thresholds, adaptive threshold, and multi-level Otsu threshold.

RESULTS: The gross tumour volumes (GTVs) delineated by the oncologists showed a moderate level of interobserver agreement with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.68. In comparison with histopathology, manual delineations exhibited the highest median DSC and the lowest false discovery rate (FDR) among all approaches. Among semi-automatic approaches, GTVs generated using standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds above 4 (SUV > 4) demonstrated the highest median DSC (0.41), with 0.51 median lesion coverage ratio, FDR of 0.66 and the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD95%) of 8.22 mm.

INTERPRETATION: Manual delineations showed a moderate level of interobserver agreement. Compared to histopathology, manual delineations and SUV > 4 exhibited the highest DSC and the lowest HD95% values. The methods that resulted in a high lesion coverage were associated with a large overestimation of the size of the lesions.

Background: Should early response imaging predict tumor response to therapy, personalized treatment adaptations could be feasible to improve outcome or reduce the risk of adverse events. This prospective single-center observational study on 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) features aims to investigate the association between semantic 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI imaging parameters and outcome prediction in uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) treated with radiotherapy.

Results: Eleven study participants with previously untreated CSCC were examined with 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI at baseline and approximately one week after start of curative radiotherapy. All study participants had at least 24 months clinical follow-up. Two patients relapsed during the follow-up period. Reduced tumor size according to visual assessment was present in 9/11 participants (median change in sum of largest diameters (SLD) − 10.4%; range − 2.5 to − 24.6%). The size reduction was less pronounced in the relapse group compared to the no relapse group, with median change in SLD − 4.9%, versus − 10.4%. None of the reductions qualified as significantly reduced or increased in size according to RECIST 1.1., hence all participants were at this stage classified as non-responders/stable disease. Median baseline functional tumor volume (FTV) for the relapse group was 126 cm3, while for the no relapse group 9.3 cm3. Median delta FTV in the relapse group was 50.7 cm3, representing an actual increase in metabolically active volume, while median delta FTV in the no relapse group was − 2.0 cm3. Median delta apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was lower in the relapse group versus the no relapse group (− 3.5 mm2/s vs. 71 mm2/s).

Conclusions: Early response assessment with 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI identified potentially predictive functional imaging biomarkers for prediction of radiotherapy outcome in CSCC, that could not be recognized with tumor measurements according to RECIST 1.1. These biomarkers (delta FTV and delta ADC) should be further evaluated.

Background and purpose: Dose escalation in external radiotherapy of prostate cancer shows promising results in terms of biochemical disease-free survival. Boost volume delineation guidelines are sparse which may cause high interobserver variability. The aim of this research was to characterize gross tumor volume (GTV) delineations based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) in relation to histopathology-validated Gleason grade 4 and 5 regions.

Material and methods: The study participants were examined with [68Ga]PSMA-PET/mpMRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Four radiation oncologists delineated GTVs in 15 study participants, on four different image types; T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and PSMA-PET scans separately. The simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm was used to generate combined GTVs. GTVs were subsequently compared to histopathology. We analysed how Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and lesion coverage are affected by using single versus multiple image types as well as by adding a clinical target volume (CTV) margin.

Results: Median DSC (STAPLE) for different GTVs varied between 0.33 and 0.52. GTVPSMA-PET/mpMRI generated the highest median lesion coverage at 0.66. Combining different image types achieved similar lesion coverage as adding a CTV margin to contours from a single image type, while reducing non-malignant tissue inclusion within the target volume.

Conclusion: The combined use of mpMRI or PSMA-PET/mpMRI shows promise, achieving higher DSC and lesion coverage while minimizing non-malignant tissue inclusion, in comparison to the use of a single image type with an added CTV margin.

BACKGROUND: There are differences in oesophageal cancer care across Sweden. According to national guidelines, all patients should be offered equal care, planned and administrated by regional multidisciplinary team meetings. The aim of the study was to investigate differences between regional multidisciplinary team meetings in Sweden regarding clinical staging and treatment recommendations for oesophageal cancer patients.

METHODS: All six Swedish regional multidisciplinary teams were each invited to retrospectively include ten consecutive oesophageal cancer cases. After anonymization, radiological investigations were presented, along with the original case-specific medical history, anew at the participating regional multidisciplinary team meetings. Estimation of clinical tumour node metastasis (TNM) classification and treatment recommendation (curative, palliative or best supportive care) were compared between multidisciplinary team meetings as well as with original assessments.

RESULTS: Five multidisciplinary teams participated and contributed a total of 50 cases presented to each multidisciplinary team. In estimations of cT-stage, the multidisciplinary teams were in total agreement in only eight of 50 cases (16%). For cN-stage, total agreement was seen in 17 of 50 cases (34%) and for cM-stage there was agreement in 34 cases (68%). For cT-stage, the overall summarized κ value was 0.57. For N-stage and M-stage the κ values were 0.66 and 0.78 respectively. Differences in appraisal were not associated with usage of positron emission tomography-computed tomography. In 15 of 50 cases (30%) the multidisciplinary teams disagreed on curative or palliative treatment.

CONCLUSION: The study shows differences in assessment of clinical TNM classification and treatment recommendations made at regional multidisciplinary team meetings. Increased interrater agreement on clinical TNM classification and management plans are essential to achieve more equal care for oesophageal cancer patients in Sweden.