Umeå University's logo

Importance: The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX (combination leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin in full or modified dosing) chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) is unclear because current studies do not account for the number of cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Objective: To investigate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX with OS, taking into account the number of cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with 2 to 11 cycles of preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX followed by resection across 48 centers in 20 countries from 2010 to 2018. Patients who died within 3 months after surgery were excluded (landmark). Data were analyzed from February 1 to December 31, 2023.

Exposures: Preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by resection and eventually followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was OS, calculated from the 3-month landmark. Cox regression analysis, including interaction analyses, was performed to investigate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with OS.

Results: Overall, 767 patients were included after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (median [IQR] age, 62 [55-67] years; 404 [52.7%] male). Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87), confirmed by adjusted OS curves. The interaction analysis to assess estimated treatment effect across subgroups was not statistically significant. The forest plot and interaction test suggest that the association of adjuvant chemotherapy was lower among patients receiving 8 or more cycles of preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX, those who had radiological response, and those with ypNO disease. Compared to no adjuvant chemotherapy, both adjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.80) and other multiagent adjuvant regimens (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92) were associated with prolonged OS, whereas single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy was not (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.03).

Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, adjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX and other multiagent chemotherapy regimens were associated with improved OS following resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX, whereas single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy was not. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS may be lower in subgroups such as patients with 8 or more preoperative cycles of (m)FOLFIRINOX, those having radiological response, and those with ypNO.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and biomarkers to guide treatment decisions in PDAC are generally lacking. Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydroge- nase (DPD) is a potential prognostic parameter in patients with PDAC undergoing surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. In the present study, DPD was analysed by immunohistochemistry of a tissue microarray platform including a real-world cohort of 495 patients with PDAC who had undergone resection with curative intent at any of three tertiary centres, including Northern, Western and Southeastern regions of Sweden, between 1993 and 2019. DPD level (high/low) was analysed and overall survival associations were assessed in treatment subgroups using a multivariate Cox regression model accounting for potential confounders. In patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy (n=182), the median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI 9.6-13.5), compared with 28.8 months (25.0-32.6) among those who had (n=313; log-rank P<0.001). The most common type of chemotherapy was gemcitabine single agent (Gem, n=239) followed by gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCape, n=39). Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and DPD expression were statistically significant prognostic parameters in the Gem group (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P=0.036), with high expres- sion of DPD linked with worse survival. In addition, tumour grade and TNM stage were statistically significant prognostic factors in the group that did not receive any chemotherapy (P≤0.001). No statistically significant parameters were iden- tified in the GemCape group. Taken together, intratumoural expression of DPD may be considered a prognostic marker for patients with PDAC treated with adjuvant gemcitabine following surgical resection, with low expression levels predicting better survival. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients receiving multi-drug or non-gemcitabine based regimens are warranted.

Objective: To investigate whether tangential versus segmental portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) impacts surgical and oncological outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with portomesenteric vein (PMV) involvement.

Summary Background Data: Current comparative studies on tangential versus segmental PVR as part of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer include all degrees of PMV involvement, including cases where tangential PVR may not be a feasible approach, limiting the clinical applicability.

Methods: International retrospective study in 10 centers from 5 countries, including all consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement on cross-sectional imaging at diagnosis (2014-2020). Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of tangential versus segmental PVR with overall survival (OS) from surgery, recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence, and in-hospital/30-day major morbidity, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Overall, 357 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR were included (42% tangential PVR, 58% segmental PVR). The adjusted risk for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 23% (95%CI, 17-32) after tangential and 23% (95%CI, 17-30) after segmental PVR (P=0.98). After adjusting for confounders, PVR type was not associated with OS (HR=0.94 [95%CI, 0.69-1.30]), RFS (HR=0.94 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28), and locoregional recurrence (OR=0.76 [95%CI, 0.40-1.46]).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement, the type of PVR (i.e., tangential vs. segmental) was not associated with differences in surgical and oncological outcome. This suggest that if both procedures are technically feasible, surgeons can choose the type of PVR based on their preference.

Background: Left-sided pancreatic cancer is associated with worse overall survival (OS) compared with right-sided pancreatic cancer. Although neoadjuvant therapy is currently seen as not effective in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC), current randomized trials included mostly patients with right-sided RPC. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between neoadjuvant therapy and OS in patients with left-sided RPC compared with upfront surgery.

Patients and methods: This was an international multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients after left-sided pancreatic resection for pathology-proven RPC, either after neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery in 76 centers from 18 countries on 4 continents (2013-2019). The primary endpoint was OS from diagnosis. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was carried out to investigate the association of neoadjuvant therapy with OS, adjusting for confounders at the time of diagnosis. Adjusted OS probabilities were calculated.

Results: Overall, 2282 patients after left-sided pancreatic resection for RPC were included of whom 290 patients (13%) received neoadjuvant therapy. The most common neoadjuvant regimens were (m)FOLFIRINOX (38%) and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (22%). After upfront surgery, 72% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, mostly a single-agent regimen (74%). Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with prolonged OS compared with upfront surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.83) with an adjusted median OS of 53 versus 37 months (P = 0.0003) and adjusted 5-year OS rates of 47% versus 35% (P = 0.0001) compared with upfront surgery. Interaction analysis demonstrated a stronger effect of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with a larger tumor (Pinteraction = 0.003) and higher serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9; Pinteraction = 0.005). In contrast, the effect of neoadjuvant therapy was not enhanced for splenic artery (Pinteraction = 0.43), splenic vein (Pinteraction = 0.30), retroperitoneal (Pinteraction = 0.84), and multivisceral (Pinteraction = 0.96) involvement.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with left-sided RPC was associated with improved OS compared with upfront surgery. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy increased with larger tumor size and higher serum CA19-9 at diagnosis. Randomized controlled trials on neoadjuvant therapy specifically in patients with left-sided RPC are needed.

Background: Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved pancreatic cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. However, whether adjuvant treatment should include radiotherapy is unclear in this setting.

Methods: This study queried the National Cancer Database for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019 and received adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (external beam, 45–50.4 gray) was compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression was used to assess survival associations. Analyses were repeated in a propensity score-matched subgroup.

Results: Of 1983 patients who received adjuvant treatment after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection, 1502 (75.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone and 481 (24.3%) received concomitant adjuvant radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). The patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were younger, were treated at non-academic facilities more often, and had higher rates of lymph node metastasis (ypN1-2), positive resection margins (R1), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI+). The median survival was shorter for the chemoradiotherapy-treated patients according to the unadjusted analysis (26.8 vs 33.2 months; p = 0.0017). After adjustment for confounders, chemoradiotherapy was associated with better outcomes in the multivariable model (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.93; p = 0.008). The association between chemoradiotherapy and improved outcomes was stronger for the patients with grade III tumors (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37–0.74) or LVI+ tumors (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.75). In a subgroup of 396 propensity-matched patients, chemoradiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit only for the patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.

Conclusion: After multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for pancreatic cancer, additional adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone is associated with improved survival for patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.

Background: Around 5–10 % of pancreatic cancer patients are non-expressors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), which has an unknown impact on the aggressiveness and prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and the prognosis of PDAC patients who do not express CA 19-9.

Methods: Patients with PDAC diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Clinical characteristics were compared according to CA 19-9 levels stratified in four different groups: non-expressors (≤1.0 U/mL), normal range (1.1–37.0 U/mL), mildly elevated (37.1–97.9 U/mL), and CA 19-9 ≥98.0 U/mL. The characteristics were analyzed in the whole cohort and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a subgroup of upfront resected patients who had cT1-3 tumors without distant metastases.

Results: In total, 88,749 patients were included, of which 4.5 % were CA 19-9 non-expressors. The non-expressors had a higher risk of having distant metastasis at diagnosis, compared to patients with normal-range or mildly elevated CA 19-9 levels. In resected patients (n = 4008), CA 19-9 non-expressors had shorted median OS compared to patients with normal-range CA 19-9 levels (29.3 vs 34.4 months, p = 0.024). This OS association remained in a multivariable Cox regression model (adjusted HR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.44).

Conclusions: CA 19-9 non-expression is associated with distant metastatic disease at diagnosis and with death in resected non-metastatic patients compared to normal-range CA 19-9 levels. This clinically relevant subgroup requires alternative biomarkers, and may need consideration of more extensive preoperative staging and intensive perioperative systemic therapy.

Background: Assessment of individual tumor biology and response to systemic therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a clinical challenge. The significance of anthropometric (body composition) changes during chemotherapy as a surrogate for tumor biology in the setting of localized PDAC is unknown.

Methods: A retrospective, single-institution analysis of patients with PDAC who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreatectomy from 2017 to 2021 was performed. Radiologic anthropometric analysis used artificial intelligence-driven software to segment and compute total and sub-compartment muscle area, adipose tissue area, and attenuation values at the level of the L3 vertebra. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models were used in survival analyses.

Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 138 patients. Although decreases in muscle and adipose tissue areas during NAT were predominant, a subset of patients experienced an increase in these compartments. Increases in muscle greater than 5% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.352; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.135–0.918; p = 0.033) and increases in adipose tissue greater than 15% (HR, 0.375; 95% CI 0.144–0.978; p = 0.045), were significantly associated with improved survival, whereas loss of visceral fat greater than 15% was detrimental (HR 1.853; CI 1.099–3.124; p = 0.021). No significant associations with single time-point anthropometrics were observed. Gains in total muscle and adipose mass were associated with improved pathologic response to systemic therapy and less advanced pathologic tumor stage.

Conclusions: Dynamic anthropometric analysis during NAT for PDAC is a stronger prognostic indicator than measurements taken at a single point in time. Repeated anthropometric analysis during preoperative chemotherapy may serve as a biomarker for individual tumor biology and response to therapy.