Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 614Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: This study, conducted across three distinct geographical regions in Sweden, highlights the diverse conditions and challenges in healthcare provision. The study focuses on the sparsely populated northern regions of Sweden, the capital city of Stockholm, and the southeast rural area of Sweden. Each location presents unique obstacles to continuity of care, influenced by factors such as population density and geographical disparities. By examining the experiences of patients with complex care needs, their family carers, and healthcare personnel, this study aims to describe the conditions for and identify potential solutions associated with the delivery of continuity in care in different geographical regions of Sweden, with differing population densities.
Method: Secondary analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis on interview data from two studies, consisting of 53 transcripts from individual, pair, and focus group interviews held between August 2018 and November 2019. The potential solutions identified from participants’ experiences were categorized into region-specific and common themes. Three personas—Vera, Bo, and Inga—were developed, each representing a scenario based on the region-specific analyses.
Results: Despite regional differences, universal solutions to common challenges were identified focusing on relational, management, and informational aspects. Common key obstacles to continuity of care included resource shortages, insufficient information transfer, and privacy regulations. Possible solutions for overcoming these challenges include prioritizing relational continuity, streamlining processes, and advocating for a unified communication system. By collaborating, building trust, understanding patient preferences, and ensuring clear communication, healthcare personnel can effectively promote continuity of care.
Conclusions: Building a stable workforce while prioritizing relational continuity, along with patients’ preferences and needs, is essential for ensuring continuity of care from multiple providers. Digital solutions can enhance collaboration across distances, while coordinating responsibilities within smaller geographical areas can strengthen partnerships among healthcare organizations. Direct dialogue, along with ensuring that everyone has access to relevant information through a unified communication system, is vital for management continuity. By integrating these universal and transferable solutions to the obstacles associated with continuity of care, we can create a cohesive care experience for patients, regardless of geographical and demographic conditions.
Keywords
Collaboration, Communication, Continuity of patient care, Coordination, Integrated care, Patient care management, Person-centered care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238605 (URN)10.1186/s12913-025-12649-1 (DOI)40296109 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105003826416 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2017–00202]
2025-05-142025-05-142025-05-14Bibliographically approved