Umeå University's logo

Background and purpose: In proton therapy, a 3.5% margin is often used to account for proton range uncertainties, of which computed tomography (CT) image noise is assumed to contribute 0.5%. This work evaluates the noise-sensitivity of three dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based methods for mapping proton stopping power relative to water (SPR): Näsmark & Andersson (N&A), Landry-Saito (L-S), and the commercial application DirectSPR.

Methods and materials: DECT image data of a CIRS-062M phantom was acquired with CT scanners from two different vendors. Acquisitions were repeated 30 times to account for intra- and inter-scan variations. SPR maps were generated with the three DECT-based methods and range simulated in a commercial treatment planning system.

Results: Noise in input data was amplified in L-S SPR maps, kept level with DirectSPR, while N&A compressed noise overall but displayed sensitivity to the choice of input data, potentially leading to increased noise levels. In our simulations, only N&A improved upon the assumed 0.5% noise contribution to range uncertainty on one scanner. On the other scanner, uncertainties exceeded 0.5% for all three methods. Mitigation of this issue was demonstrated by using a method employing virtual mono-energetic images as input. Increasing imaging radiation dose, as expected, alleviates the problem, while applying noise reduction only helped to a lesser extent.

Conclusions: While range uncertainty due to noise is small compared to other contributions, it becomes more important as we move towards smaller treatment margins and the noise-sensitivity of SPR mapping methods should be carefully estimated and considered before clinical implementation.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to assess a proof of concept for a novel method for predicting proton stopping power ratios (SPRs) based on a pair of dual-energy CT generated virtual monoenergetic (VM) images.

Materials and methods: A rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT scanner was used to acquire Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) and 120 kV conventional single-energy CT (SECT) image data of the CIRS 062M phantom. The proposed method was applied to every possible pairing of VM images between 40 and 140 keV to find the optimal energy pairs for SPR prediction in lung tissue, soft tissue, and bone. The predicted SPRs were compared against SPRs predicted from the SECT data using the conventional SECT-based method. The impact of different scan and reconstruction parameters was also investigated.

Results: The SPR residual root mean square errors (RMSE) yielded by the optimal pairs were 7.2% for lung tissue, 0.4% for soft tissue, and 0.8% for bone. While no direct comparison could be made to other DECT-based methods for SPR prediction, as these methods could not be directly implemented on a fast kV-switching system, the SPR RMSEs for soft tissue and bone in Table 4 are comparable to RMSEs reported in the literature. For the conventional SECT-based method, the SPR RMSEs were 5.9% for lung tissue, 0.9% for soft tissue, and 5.1% for bone.

Conclusions: The proposed method is a valid alternative to, and has the potential to improve upon, the conventional SECT-based method for predicting SPRs. The formalism used in the method is applied directly, with no approximations made on our part, and requires neither prior knowledge of the spectra nor calibration with a phantom. This work presents a way of optimizing the proposed method for a specific scanner by determining the optimal energy pairs to use as input and demonstrates the method's robustness to different levels of ASiR-V, reconstruction kernels, and dose levels.