Open this publication in new window or tab >>2024 (English)In: The international migration review, ISSN 0197-9183, E-ISSN 1747-7379, Vol. 58, no 2, p. 573-592Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
According to scapegoat theory, individuals tend to attribute personal or social problems to an out-group (real or imagined). This self-serving bias protects the ego or social identity from responsibility while increasing prejudice towards the out-group blamed for feelings of frustration. In this research note, we test this theory using five waves of the Czech Household Panel Study (CHPS 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020), which captures the tail end of the 2015–2016 refugee crisis in Europe through the lockdown in response to COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We focus attention on both personal and professional domains, asking if factors like subjective health, work stress, relationship dissatisfaction, life dissatisfaction, and unhappiness contribute to attitudes towards immigrants over time. We also ask whether socio-political attitudes such as distrust in the government, social distrust, and political disinterest are associated with changes in anti-immigrant sentiment. Results show that personal and professional domains help explain between-individual differences in attitudes towards immigrants, while trust in the government and society are related to both within-individual change and between-individual differences in anti-immigrant sentiment.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024
Keywords
scapegoat theory, anti-immigrant sentiment, panel study
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-207926 (URN)10.1177/01979183231177971 (DOI)001010375000001 ()2-s2.0-85162683480 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2016-07177Swedish Research Council, 2016-04165
2023-05-052023-05-052024-07-02Bibliographically approved