Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Trends in mathematics motivation between 1980 and 2015: exploring the educational-gender-equality paradox over time
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4417-5016
2026 (English)In: Studies in Educational Evaluation, ISSN 0191-491X, E-ISSN 1879-2529, Vol. 88, article id 101568Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A growing body of recent research suggests that in wealthier and more gender-egalitarian countries, gender differences in attitudes to, graduation rates in, and occupational preferences for disciplines related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics are larger. These findings contradict the gender stratification hypothesis, i.e., that enhancing gender equality reduces the gender gaps disadvantaging girls. This study examines the educational-gender-equality paradox concerning motivation for learning mathematics using country-level panel data analysis. The analysis expands the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study’s twenty-year cognitive trend scale by including the Second International Mathematics Study. We apply a market-basket approach with item response theory modeling to construct comparable motivation scales of the student questionnaires that account for both cultural and longitudinal differences. Our results suggest that the economic development of a country is associated with the country-level gender gap in intrinsic motivation, potentially influencing pupils with a lower parental education background more.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 88, article id 101568
Keywords [en]
Educaitonal gender equality paradox, International largescale assessments, Item response theory, Longitudinal analysis, Mathematics motivation
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-249660DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101568ISI: 001681665000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105028986844OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-249660DiVA, id: diva2:2038836
Available from: 2026-02-16 Created: 2026-02-16 Last updated: 2026-02-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4520 kB)36 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4520 kBChecksum SHA-512
4a7a03cbc3f10536b9ced0a461f68d2d18aecdb92c14d8786bf50fd4fcbf37792611689ff6a79e6f88e5adc2bd3cddb11609928f5a11338d755adc02136c74c4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Majoros, Erika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Majoros, Erika
By organisation
Department of applied educational science
In the same journal
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 3241 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf