Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multimodal rehabilitation of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, focusing on primary care
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering, Rehabiliteringsmedicin.
2018 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Background: Chronic pain is a complex condition that has consequences both for individual people and for society. The individual often experiences impact on function, activity and participation. Society is affected by high healthcare and sick leave costs and a loss of workforce. Multimodal rehabilitation programmes (MMRP) have mainly been provided through specialist care but it is now also available through primary care. The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate the effects of MMRP in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and to explore patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of MMRP.

Study I: Aim: To evaluate the effects of an interdisciplinary team assessment and MMRP for patients with chronic pain in a specialist care setting. Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Method: Pain intensity, pain dimensions, anxiety and depression were measured at assessment and at the start and end of MMRP.  A total of 93 women were evaluated. Result: Pain and pain-related measures were significantly improved both after the interdisciplinary assessment and after MMRP.

Study II: Aim: To explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of MMRP in primary care. Design: Individual interviews, analysed with qualitative content analysis. Method: Fourteen healthcare professionals (11 women, 3 men) were interviewed about their work with MMRP. Result: Healthcare professionals considered that MMRP was useful but also challenging. It was difficult to select appropriate patients, and health care professionals felt they were torn between following healthcare legislation and the goals of MMRP. They had to deal with ethical dilemmas as well as decide what constitutes good results.

Study III: Aim: To explore patients’ experiences of participating in MMRP in primary care. Design: Individual interviews, analysed with qualitative content analysis. Method: Twelve former patients (7 women and 5 men) were interviewed about their experiences of MMRP in primary care. Result: Patients in primary care experienced a complex, ongoing process of accepting chronic pain. Obtaining redress, learning about chronic pain, and experiencing fellowship with others with the same condition contributed to the acceptance process.

Study IV: Aim: To evaluate the effects of MMRP in primary care at one-year follow-up for all patients together and for men and women separately and to identify predictive factors for being employable at follow-up. Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. Method: Pain, physical and emotional functioning, coping, health-related quality of life, work-related factors, sick leave extent and sickness compensation were evaluated prior to and one year after MMRP in 234 patients, 34 men and 200 women. Result: All patients improved significantly in most measures at one-year follow-up, and the effect was larger in women. Sick leave decreased while no significant difference was found for total sickness compensation. Patients’ self-reported rating of current work ability before MMRP was significantly associated with being employable at follow-up.

General conclusions and implications: 

MMRP seems to be effective for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, both in specialist care and in primary care. MMRP was more effective for women than for men, and the reasons for this need to be investigated further. An interdisciplinary team assessment could also be beneficial for decreasing pain and pain-related measures. Patients in primary care experience a complex, ongoing process of accepting chronic pain. Healthcare professionals have to deal with conflicting emotions with regard to different commitments from healthcare legislation and the goals of MMRP.                         

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2018. , s. 58
Serie
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1970
Emneord [en]
Multimodal Rehabilitation, Chronic Pain, Primary Care, Specialist Care
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
rehabiliteringsmedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151466ISBN: 978-91-7601-913-9 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-151466DiVA, id: diva2:1245059
Disputas
2018-09-28, Hörsal Betula, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 13:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-09-06 Laget: 2018-09-04 Sist oppdatert: 2024-07-02bibliografisk kontrollert
Delarbeid
1. The effects of interdisciplinary team assessment and a rehabilitation program for patients with chronic pain
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>The effects of interdisciplinary team assessment and a rehabilitation program for patients with chronic pain
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, ISSN 0894-9115, E-ISSN 1537-7385, Vol. 92, nr 1, s. 77-83Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of interdisciplinary team assessment and a 4-wk rehabilitation program in chronic pain patients.

Design: This was a longitudinal cohort study evaluating interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation measures in a specialist care setting. A total of 93 women (42.2 +/- 9.5 yrs) with chronic musculoskeletal pain (median pain duration, 8 yrs) were evaluated at assessment and at the start and end of the rehabilitation program. Pain intensity measured with a visual analog scale, pain dimensions measured with the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and anxiety and depression measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were registered.

Results: The participants exhibited significantly improved results of pain and pain-related measures. The results were seen both after the short-term intervention in the form of the interdisciplinary assessment and after the 4-wk rehabilitation program. The improvements seen after the assessment were not related to specific interventions, such as change of medication, and therefore seem to be a result of the interdisciplinary assessment concept as such.

Conclusions: Both interdisciplinary assessment and rehabilitation program seem to be effective in chronic pain rehabilitation, at least for women. Further studies are needed to investigate potential sex differences, as well as content and duration for optimal pain rehabilitation programs.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013
Emneord
Treatment, Interdisciplinary Health Team, Chronic Pain, Program Evaluation
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-64260 (URN)10.1097/PHM.0b013e318278b28e (DOI)000312542500009 ()2-s2.0-84872080862 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-01-28 Laget: 2013-01-21 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-11bibliografisk kontrollert
2. Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care: a qualitative study
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care: a qualitative study
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 38, nr 21, s. 2085-2094Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Exploring healthcare professional experiences of Multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) in primary care.

Methods: Fourteen healthcare professionals (11 women, 3 men) were individually interviewed about their work with MMR in primary care. Interviews covered experiences of assessing patients and work with patients in the programme. Transcribed interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results: The analysis resulted in four categories: select patients for success; a multilevel challenge; ethical dilemmas and considering what is a good result. MMR work was experienced as useful and efficient, but also challenging because of patient complexity. Preconceptions about who is a suitable patient for MMR influenced the selection of patients (e.g. gender, different culture). Interviewees were conflicted about not to being able to offer MMR to patients who were not going to return to work. They thought that there were more factors to evaluate MMR than by the proportion that return to work.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals perceive MMR as a helpful method for treating chronic pain patients. At the same time, they thought that only including patients who would return to work conflicted with their ethical views on equal healthcare for all patients. Preconceptions can influence selection for, and work with, MMR.

Emneord
Gender bias, health care professionals, immigrants, multimodal treatment, pain
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-126352 (URN)10.3109/09638288.2015.1114156 (DOI)000381539600012 ()26728252 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-84953299088 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-10-20 Laget: 2016-10-03 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-11bibliografisk kontrollert
3. "The acceptance" of living with chronic pain – an ongoing process: A qualitative study of patient experiences of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>"The acceptance" of living with chronic pain – an ongoing process: A qualitative study of patient experiences of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 50, nr 1, s. 73-79Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experiences of participating in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care.

SUBJECTS: Twelve former patients (7 women and 5 men) in multimodal rehabilitation in primary care were interviewed about their experiences of multimodal rehabilitation.

METHODS: The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: Analysis resulted in 4 categories: (i) from discredited towards obtaining redress; (ii) from uncertainty towards knowledge; (iii) from loneliness towards togetherness; and (iv) "acceptance of pain": an ongoing process. The results show that having obtained redress, to obtain knowledge about chronic pain, and to experience fellowship with others with the same condition were helpful in the acceptance process. However, there were patients who found it difficult to reconcile themselves with a life with chronic pain after multimodal rehabilitation. To find what was "wrong" and to have a medical diagnosis and cure were important.

CONCLUSION: Patients in primary care multimodal rehabilitation experience a complex, ongoing process of accepting chronic pain. Four important categories were described. These findings will help others to understand the experience and perspective of patients with chronic pain who engage in multimodal rehabilitation.

HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-146896 (URN)10.2340/16501977-2286 (DOI)000435532700012 ()29077130 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85040622030 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-04-23 Laget: 2018-04-23 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-11bibliografisk kontrollert
4. Long-term effects of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic pain
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Long-term effects of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic pain
Vise andre…
(engelsk)Manuskript (preprint) (Annet vitenskapelig)
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
rehabiliteringsmedicin
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151463 (URN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-09-04 Laget: 2018-09-04 Sist oppdatert: 2018-09-05

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(822 kB)457 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstørrelse 822 kBChecksum SHA-512
e0472dce8f9d784e821f450146c220121fb6e30346c00eae17b71384f78dc4b0a76f99de3878f5fb4ed8de07fab7d6287af3a5f3d734ba4b3a7750e1bea31895
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(61 kB)126 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT03.pdfFilstørrelse 61 kBChecksum SHA-512
3d6a0b52d1e45b653b015860a5094c06a4df82a1a3192a4a9a530aec29ca179b36558a29f935a3336b0cb970696d2a68e4aa9ff42790fa37ac97f10fecfc23a8
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf
omslag(360 kB)92 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil COVER01.pdfFilstørrelse 360 kBChecksum SHA-512
db5c84d728e4497d37ae5f758891ab7862457e9b9d5b570722b1b67042a0c432c8d098a8b934e839e4cc20c41651e9ff75c4244b358e96fef73beb676772b5a1
Type coverMimetype application/pdf

Person

Pietilä Holmner, Elisabeth

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Pietilä Holmner, Elisabeth
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 585 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1540 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf