Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treatment and prognosis of bladder cancer patients with other primary cancers: A nationwide population-based study in the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden (BladderBaSe)
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Enheten för biobanksforskning. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6808-4405
Vise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: BJU International, ISSN 1464-4096, E-ISSN 1464-410X, Vol. 126, nr 5, s. 625-632Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To study how patients with urinary bladder cancer (UBC) with previous or concomitant other primary cancers (OPC) were treated, and to investigate their prognosis.

METHODS: Using nationwide population-based data in the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden (BladderBaSe), we analysed the probability of treatment with curative intent, and bladder cancer specific and overall survival in patients with UBC diagnosed in the period 1997 - 2014 with or without OPC. The analyses considered the patient's characteristics, UBC tumour stage at diagnosis and site of OPC.

RESULTS: There were 38689 patients, of which 9804 (25%) had OPC. Those with synchronous OPC more often had T2 and T3 tumours and clinically distant disease at diagnosis than those with UBC only. Patients with synchronous prostate cancer, female genital cancer and lower gastro-intestinal cancer were more often treated with curative intent than patients with UBC only. When models of survival were adjusted for age at diagnosis, marital status, education, year of diagnosis, CCI and T-stage, UBC-specific survival was similar to patients with UBC only, but overall survival was lower for patients with synchronous OPC, explained mainly by deaths in OPC primaries with a bad prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS: OPC is common in patients with UBC. Treatment for UBC - after or in conjunction with an OPC - should not be neglected and carries just as high probability of success as treatment in patients with UBC only. The needs of patients with UBC and OPC and optimisation of their treatment in light of their complicated disease trajectory are important areas of research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 126, nr 5, s. 625-632
Emneord [en]
Bladder cancer, cohort study, management, other primary cancer, outcome
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-174088DOI: 10.1111/bju.15198ISI: 000564568000001PubMedID: 32762064Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089980293OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-174088DiVA, id: diva2:1458390
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Cancer Society, CAN 2019/62Swedish Cancer Society, CAN 2017/278Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-08-17 Laget: 2020-08-17 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Häggström, ChristelSherif, Amir

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Häggström, ChristelSherif, Amir
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
BJU International

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 407 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf