Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
1H NMRD profiles and ESR lineshapes of Gd(III) complexes: a comparison between the generalized SBM and the stochastic Liouville approach
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Kemiska institutionen.
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Kemiska institutionen.
2005 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of magnetic resonance, ISSN 1090-7807, E-ISSN 1096-0856, Vol. 173, nr 1, s. 75-83Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

A complete description of the T1-NMRD profiles and the ESR lineshape of Gd(III) complexes (S = 7/2) was presented using second-order perturbation theory (GSBM) by Zhou et al. [J. Magn. Reson. 167 (2004) 147]. This report compares the GSBM with the stochastic Liouville approach (SLA) to determine the validity of the closed analytical expressions of NMRD and the ESR lineshape functions. Both approaches give the same results at high fields while a very small divergence is observed for X- and W-band ESR lineshapes when the magnitude of the perturbation term times the correlation time approaches the limit of the perturbation regime, ΔZFSτf ≈ 0.1. There was a clear discrepancy between the theoretical GSBM X-band spectrum and the recorded ESR spectrum of the Gd(III) MS-325 + HSA complex. This is probably due to a slow-motion effect caused by a slow modulation of the ZFS interaction. The characteristic correlation time of this slow modulation is in the range of 150 ps, which therefore cannot be due to the reorientational motion of the whole MS-325 + HSA complex.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
San Diego: Academic Press, 2005. Vol. 173, nr 1, s. 75-83
Emneord [en]
GSBM, SLA, NMRD, ESR, MS-325
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-14677DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.10.014ISI: 000227103500010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-13444249690OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-14677DiVA, id: diva2:154349
Tilgjengelig fra: 2008-03-31 Laget: 2008-03-31 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-20bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. An Analysis of NMRD profiles and ESR lineshapes of MRI Contrast Agents
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>An Analysis of NMRD profiles and ESR lineshapes of MRI Contrast Agents
2004 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

To optimize contrast agent in MRI scan region, e.g. to enhance paramagnetic relaxation in the MRI scan fields(0.1T-3T), one possible way is to slow down the tumbling of the paramagnetic complex. The effect of slowing down the reorientational motion of the complex to increase relaxivity is obvious and this strategy has already been employed in producing MRI contrast agent that can bind to specific proteins. An example is MS-325 binds to human serum albumin(HSA). The slow down effects on the ligands around paramagnetic ion, and on the zero field splitting(ZFS) interaction are under studies and the physics behind is still not clear. In this thesis, a generalized Solomon-Bloembergen-Morgan(GSBM) theory together with stochastic Liouville approach(SLA), is applied to investigate the mechanism behind the slow down effects. Two gadolinium complexes, MS-325+HSA and Gd(H2O)83++glycerol are studied by means of NMRD and ESR experiments.

GSBM is a second order perturbation theory with closed analytical form. The computation based on this theory is fast, but it has its limitation and in the case of Gd(S=7/2) the ZFS strength times its correlation time(Δt.τƒ) should be less than 0.1. In comparison, the SLA is an "exact" theory that can evaluate the validity of GSBM calculation. However, the calculation in SLA is time consuming due to the large matrix it constructed. The major model used in GSBM is a two dynamic model, characterized by transient ZFS Δt and static ZFS Δs and their corresponding correlation time τƒ and τR, while in SLA the model is only described by Δt and τƒ. A combined NMRD and ESR analysis is used to understand the details of ZFS interaction. Both models can reproduce experimental NMRD profiles and model parameters are similar; for ESR linewidths the model parameters are quite different. The fitting results indicate the NMRD profiles are less sensitive to the detail expression of ZFS correlation function. In order to interpret both NMRD and ESR experiments with identical parameters, a more complex ZFS interaction model should be developed.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Umeå: Kemi, 2004. s. 40
Emneord
Physical chemistry, MRI contrast agent, MS-325, Spin relaxation, NMRD, ESR, Fysikalisk kemi
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
fysikalisk kemi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-361 (URN)91-7305-777-0 (ISBN)
Disputas
2004-12-09, KB3A9, KBC, Umeå University, Umeå, 10:00
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2004-11-12 Laget: 2004-11-12 Sist oppdatert: 2017-05-04bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Westlund, Per-Olof

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Westlund, Per-Olof
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of magnetic resonance

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 446 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf