Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Distinguishing Disadvantage from Ill-Being in the Capability Approach
Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier.
2021 (engelsk)Inngår i: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, E-ISSN 1572-8447, Vol. 24, nr 4, s. 933-947Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Central capabilitarian theories of well-being focus exclusively on actual opportunities to attain states of being and doing that people have reason to value. Consequently, these theories characterise ill-being and disadvantage as deprivations of such opportunities and attainments. However, some well-being aspects are inherently negative. They make up the difference between not being well and being unwell in that they constitute ill-being. While disadvantage can be plausibly captured by deprivations, ill-being cannot be fully captured by them. I support this claim by analysing cases involving inherently negative aspects of homelessness that are not mere deprivations of opportunities to attain beings and doings that people have reason to value. I conclude that ill-being is not only about what one cannot be and do, but also about one’s enduring, and opportunities to avoid, negative beings and doings. Theories and policies should reflect this to get things right, and to do right by people.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2021. Vol. 24, nr 4, s. 933-947
Emneord [en]
Capability approach, Disadvantage, Homelessness, Ill-being, Well-being
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-187929DOI: 10.1007/s10677-021-10232-1ISI: 000698345700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115311900OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-187929DiVA, id: diva2:1597683
Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-09-27 Laget: 2021-09-27 Sist oppdatert: 2023-05-11bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Being well and doing good
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Being well and doing good
2023 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Alternativ tittel[sv]
Vara väl och göra gott
Abstract [en]

This dissertation contains an introductory chapter and four articles. In section 1 of the introductory chapter, I provide an overview of my argument. In section 2, I do five things. First, I show that well-being is subject-relative, meaning that well-being is always present in a life if it is present at all. Second, I restrict the discussion to people as welfare subjects. Third, I describe the levels of generality that well-being theorising can take. Fourth, I show well-being’s relations to other values. Fifth, I describe the distinction between having or not having positive well-being and enduring ill-being. In section 3 of the introductory chapter, I outline the main philosophical well-being theories. I highlight their strengths and weaknesses, before moving on to section 4 where I describe the conceptual framework I use in my articles: the capability approach. The capability approach focuses on genuine opportunities, beings, and doings. The opportunities, beings, and doings can be specified in different contexts as needed. Hence, capabilitarian analyses focusing on different opportunities, beings and doings, are available. In my articles, I argue for four things regarding those well-being analyses. First, I argue that, and show how, expert opinions and public opinions can be reconciled in well-being policy-making situations. Second, I argue that, and show how, prudentially negative beings and doings should be assessed by analysing cases of homelessness. Third, I argue that the capability approach can be used to offer a complementary account to the predominant philosophical analyses of addiction which mainly focus on its descriptive nature. My complementary analysis highlights further targets for policy-making efforts. Fourth, I argue that well-being is context-sensitive. To that end, I bolster the capability approach by refining a view called contextualism. I defend this view against counterarguments and consequently both contextualism and the capability approach are made more viable.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Umeå: Umeå University, 2023. s. 47
Serie
Umeå studies in philosophy, ISSN 1650-1748 ; 14
Emneord
well-being, ill-being, capability approach, monism, pluralism
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
etik
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-207989 (URN)978-91-8070-063-4 (ISBN)978-91-8070-064-1 (ISBN)
Disputas
2023-06-09, Hörsal HUM.D.220 (Hörsal F), Umeå, 13:15 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2023-05-17 Laget: 2023-05-11 Sist oppdatert: 2023-05-11bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(470 kB)127 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstørrelse 470 kBChecksum SHA-512
d3ffcbb5639a1a241daa8d6cb9d0c839f91d71dbb14af6dad482edcde8e840f76c20f4225b71abd0da63dbc81f80c4d97452ec0185db632f8e93d6b178316a53
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Östlund, Sebastian

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Östlund, Sebastian
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 147 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 207 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf