Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A state-of-the-art review of direct observation tools for assessing competency in person-centred care
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of Nursing Studies, ISSN 0020-7489, E-ISSN 1873-491X, Vol. 109, artikel-id 103634Artikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Direct observation is a common assessment strategy in health education and training, in which trainees are observed and assessed while undertaking authentic patient care and clinical activities. A variety of direct observation tools have been developed for assessing competency in delivering person-centred care (PCC), yet to our knowledge no review of such tools exists.

OBJECTIVE: To review and evaluate direct observation tools developed to assess health professionals' competency in delivering PCC.

DESIGN: State-of-the-art review DATA SOURCES: Electronic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL, and Web of Science for English-language articles describing the development and testing of direct observation tools for assessing PCC published until March 2017.

REVIEW METHODS: Three authors independently assessed the records for eligibility. Duplicates were removed and articles were excluded that were irrelevant based on title and/or abstract. All remaining articles were read in full text. A data extraction form was developed to cover and extract information about the tools. The articles were examined for any conceptual or theoretical frameworks underlying tool development and coverage of recognized PCC dimensions was evaluated against a standard framework. The psychometric performance of the tools was obtained directly from the original articles.

RESULT: 16 tools were identified: five assessed PCC holistically and 11 assessed PCC within specific skill domains. Conceptual/theoretical underpinnings of the tools were generally unclear. Coverage of PCC domains varied markedly between tools. Most tools reported assessments of inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity; however, intra-rater reliability, content and construct validity were rarely reported. Predictive and discriminant validity were not assessed.

CONCLUSION: Differences in scope, coverage and content of the tools likely reflect the complexity of PCC and lack of consensus in defining this concept. Although all may serve formative purposes, evidence supporting their use in summative evaluations is limited. Patients were not involved in the development of any tool, which seems intrinsically paradoxical given the aims of PCC. The tools may be useful for providing trainee feedback; however, rigorously tested and patient-derived tools are needed for high-stakes use.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 109, artikel-id 103634
Nyckelord [en]
Observation-based methods, Patient-centred care, Person-centred care, State-of-the-art review
Nationell ämneskategori
Omvårdnad Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-174421DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103634ISI: 000578971400003PubMedID: 32531569Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086134831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-174421DiVA, id: diva2:1460508
Forskningsfinansiär
Vetenskapsrådet, 2009-1088Tillgänglig från: 2020-08-24 Skapad: 2020-08-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-03-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1665 kB)258 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1665 kBChecksumma SHA-512
53dabe1cd4912f169437117f8cf9e49e01b6250b6b24192c58c3c22c6a34aa9a16dcc850801fd6b7ea9879da1b20824d51a3657e92fa55352cd06f254c2fb54b
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Boström, Eva

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Boström, Eva
Av organisationen
Institutionen för omvårdnad
I samma tidskrift
International Journal of Nursing Studies
OmvårdnadHälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 258 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 438 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf