Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
MicroRNA expression in KRAS- and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Anticancer Research, ISSN 0250-7005, E-ISSN 1791-7530, Vol. 38, no 2, p. 677-683Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background/Aim: KRAS and BRAF are two genes commonly mutated in colorectal cancer (CRC). Even though BRAF is a downstream target of KRAS in the MAPK signalling pathway, KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs are found to display several different clinical and histopathological features. We investigated whether a differential expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) could explain the clinicopathological differences seen between KRAS-and BRAF-mutated CRCs.

Materials and Methods: Using a PCR array, we analyzed the expression of 84 different miRNAs in CRC cell lines wild-type in KRAS and BRAF, or mutated in KRAS or BRAF.

Results: Ten miRNAs were selected for further analyses in tumor tissue specimens (let-7a, let-7i, miR-10a, miR-10b, miR-31, miR-100, miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-372, and miR-373). BRAF-mutated tumors were found to express significantly higher levels of miR-31 as well as significantly lower levels of miR-373, compared to wild-type tumors.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that KRAS and BRAF-mutated CRCs may have different miRNA signatures compared to CRC tumors wild-type in KRAS and BRAF. However, no difference in expression levels between KRAS-and BRAF-mutated tumors was evident for the miRNAs analyzed in this study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Institute of Anticancer Research, 2018. Vol. 38, no 2, p. 677-683
Keywords [en]
colorectal cancer, miRNA, KRAS, BRAF, molecular subgroups
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-133409DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12272ISI: 000423315300010PubMedID: 29374690Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85041668710OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-133409DiVA, id: diva2:1087726
Note

Originally included in thesis in manuscript form

Available from: 2017-04-10 Created: 2017-04-10 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Molecular understanding of KRAS- and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Molecular understanding of KRAS- and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers
2017 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy in both men and women, and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. One frequently mutated pathway involved in oncogenesis in CRC is the RAS/RAF/MAP kinase pathway. Oncogenic activation of KRAS and BRAF occur in 30‒40% and 5‒15% of all CRCs, respectively, and the mutations are mutually exclusive. Even though KRAS and BRAF are known to act in the same pathway, KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs have different clinical and histopathological features. For example, BRAF mutation in CRC is tightly linked to microsatellite instability (MSI) and a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), which is not seen in KRAS-mutated tumours. BRAF-mutated CRCs are also more often found in right-sided tumours. However, the underlying molecular reasons for these differences have not yet been defined.

The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate molecular differences between KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs to understand how KRAS and BRAF mutations differentially affect tumour progression. We used an in vitro cell culture system to explore molecular differences between KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs and verified our findings using CRC tissue specimens from the Colorectal Cancer in Umeå Study (CRUMS).

We found that BRAF mutation, but not KRAS mutation, was associated with expression of the stem cell factor SOX2. Furthermore, SOX2 was found to be correlated to a poor patient prognosis, especially in BRAF-mutated cancers. We further investigated the role of BRAF in regulation of SOX2 expression and found that SOX2 is at least partly regulated by BRAF in vitro. We continued by investigating the functional role of SOX2 in CRC and found that SOX2-expressing cells shared several characteristics with cancer stem cells, and also had down-regulated expression of the intestinal epithelial marker CDX2. There was a strong correlation between loss of CDX2 expression and poor patient prognosis, and patients with SOX2 expression were found to have a particularly poor prognosis when CDX2 levels were down-regulated. In conclusion, in these studies we identified a subgroup of BRAF-mutated CRCs with a particularly poor prognosis, and having a cancer stem cell-like appearance with increased expression of SOX2 and decreased expression of CDX2.

Tumour progression is regulated by interactions with cells of the immune system. We found that BRAF-mutated CRCs were more highly infiltrated by Th1 lymphocytes than BRAF wild-type tumours, while the opposite was true for KRAS-mutated CRCs. Interestingly, we found that part of this difference is probably caused by differences in secreted chemokines and cytokines between KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs, stimulating different arms of the immune response.

Altered levels of expression of miRNAs have been seen in several malignancies, including CRC. We found that BRAF- and KRAS-mutated CRCs showed miRNA signatures different from those of wild-type CRCs, but the expression of miRNAs did not distinguish KRAS-mutated tumours from BRAF-mutated tumours.

In summary, our findings have revealed possible molecular differences between KRAS- and BRAF-mutated CRCs that may explain some of the differences in their clinical and histopathological behaviour.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2017. p. 44
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1885
Keywords
Colorectal cancer, BRAF, KRAS, SOX2, CDX2, cancer stem cell, Th1 lymphocytes, miRNA, prognosis
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Cell and Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-133410 (URN)978-91-7601-677-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-05-05, Hörsal E04, byggnad 6E, Norrlands universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-04-12 Created: 2017-04-10 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lundberg, IdaWikberg, Maria L.Ljuslinder, IngridLi, XingruMyte, RobinZingmark, CarlLöfgren-Burström, AnnaEdin, SofiaPalmqvist, Richard

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundberg, IdaWikberg, Maria L.Ljuslinder, IngridLi, XingruMyte, RobinZingmark, CarlLöfgren-Burström, AnnaEdin, SofiaPalmqvist, Richard
By organisation
PathologyOncology
In the same journal
Anticancer Research
Cell and Molecular BiologyCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 811 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf