Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical Referral Laboratories in Rwanda: The Status of Quality Improvement After 7 Years of the SLMTA Program
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Section of Virology. College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda; Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda. (Magnus evander)
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
National Referral Laboratory, Kigali, Rwanda.
Butare University Teaching Hospital, Huye, Rwanda.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, ISSN 0002-9173, E-ISSN 1943-7722, Vol. 150, no 3, p. 240-245Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: We investigated the quality system performance in Rwandan referral laboratories to determine their progress toward accreditation.

Methods: We conducted audits across five laboratories in 2017, using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation checklist. Laboratories were scored based on the World Health Organization grading scale (0-5 stars scale) and compared with earlier audits.

Results: Between 2012 and 2017, only one laboratory progressed (from four to five stars). Four of the five laboratories decreased to one (three laboratories) and zero (one laboratory) stars from four and three stars. Management reviews, evaluation, audits, documents, records, and identification of nonconformities showed a low performance.

Conclusions: Four of five laboratories are not moving toward accreditation. However, this target is still achievable by energizing responsibilities of stakeholders and monitoring and evaluation. This would be possible because of the ability that laboratories showed in earlier audits, coupled with existing health policy that enables sustainable quality health care in Rwanda.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2018. Vol. 150, no 3, p. 240-245
Keywords [en]
Laboratory, Accreditation, Rwanda, SLMTA, Health system, Quality health care
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-152220DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy047ISI: 000443540700006PubMedID: 29931081Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074763119OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-152220DiVA, id: diva2:1256111
Funder
Sida - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 51160027-04Sida - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 51160059-10Available from: 2018-10-16 Created: 2018-10-16 Last updated: 2021-12-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Quality of clinical laboratory services in Rwanda
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Quality of clinical laboratory services in Rwanda
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Kvaliteten på kliniska laboratorietjänster i Rwanda
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Poor quality health care is a serious silent public health problem worldwide, resulting in deaths, disabilities and long hospital stays with unnecessary costs. It affects patients in all countries regardless of their level of development. Estimations show that 64 million disability-adjusted life years are lost yearly worldwide due to unsafe health care, and this phenomenon is one of the top 10 causes of mortality and disability in the world. Four out of 10 patients are harmed while getting health care in primary and outpatient health care services. Most of this unsafe care is due to errors in diagnosis, prescriptions and use of medicines. Better management of patients could be accomplished with clearer diagnostics. Clinical laboratories play a central role in the quality of health care when they provide accurate and reliable test results for timely and evidence-based diagnostic for management of patients, surveillance and control of diseases. The aim of this dissertation was to study the quality of clinical laboratory services in Rwanda to contribute to the health care quality in Rwanda and other similar settings.

Methods: This dissertation is built on studies that used mainly primary data collected at five clinical referral laboratories and related hospitals (Papers I–III). To assess the quality performance of laboratories, the World Health Organization (WHO) Stepwise Laboratory Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist was used to score laboratories and to analyse the trend in quality performance (Paper I). The factors explaining the status of quality performance of laboratories were explored by using qualitative data, namely key informant interviews with thematic analysis (Paper II). Physicians’ satisfaction with laboratory services was assessed by using a structured questionnaire with a Likert scale and an open-ended question. All eligible physicians from four referral hospitals (N = 507) were invited to participate in the study (Paper III) and 91% provided their feedback. Descriptive statistics and ordered logistic regression were performed and qualitative data were analysed with a thematic approach. To identify pathogenic viruses circulating in Rwanda with no available diagnosis, we sampled 11 health centres for febrile patients with acute infections whose malaria test result was negative (n = 2313). Selected arboviruses were analysed from blood samples by using polymerase chain reaction (Paper IV).

Results and Discussion: In 2017, only one referral laboratory scored at the highest level, five stars, which was an increase from four stars in 2012. The other four laboratories had decreased in quality performance. The factors explaining this decrease were mainly insufficient coordination to ensure continuous quality improvement as well as lack of mentorship and regular external assessment of laboratory to identify and address gaps. Only 36% of physicians were satisfied with laboratory services in referral hospitals. Seventy per cent were satisfied with the reliability of test results, while only 19% were satisfied with the turnaround time, and improved virus diagnostics was sought. In general, paediatricians, internists and more experienced physicians were less satisfied. Over 2000 samples from acute, febrile patients were sampled in 11 health centres from different provinces of Rwanda and are now stored in a unique biobank for future analysis. The results so far show that o’nyong-nyong and Zika viruses are circulating in Rwanda.

Conclusion: Despite the improvement in quality performance with the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme, most laboratories showed decreased performance in their follow-up assessments compared with their exit assessment. Resuming external assessments as well as investing in leadership and planning would lead to high-quality laboratory performance, even reaching international accreditation. For sustainability, the SLMTA programme should be institutionalised, the laboratory quality management system should be integrated into the education of laboratory staff and in continuous professional development training. Extended diagnostics for infectious diseases should be considered. The achievement of quality health care, universal health coverage and global health security are not possible without quality laboratory services that guide the pathway through accurate and reliable tests results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2022. p. 79
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2163
Keywords
Quality of healthcare, SLMTA, laboratory, diagnostic, Quality management system, Rwanda
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
Public health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-190649 (URN)978-91-7855-699-1 (ISBN)978-91-7855-700-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-01-27, Triple Helix, Universitetsledningshuset, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-01-07 Created: 2021-12-20 Last updated: 2022-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(513 kB)300 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 513 kBChecksum SHA-512
7475962d82219fb55a1a499a6a5a26f84d651963b564fe15b011f272b9efd8ef9c402c91d28ed7b8245645a309c9c0a9813813c4a80623b23c2c5f4b4fb94e78
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rusanganwa, VincentHurtig, Anna-KarinEvander, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rusanganwa, VincentHurtig, Anna-KarinEvander, Magnus
By organisation
Section of VirologyEpidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 300 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 539 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf