Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Forest social values: the case of Dalasjo, Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Geography.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Geography. Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden. (Arcum)
2020 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, ISSN 0282-7581, E-ISSN 1651-1891, Vol. 35, no 3-4, p. 177-185Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Forest social values has been put forward as an umbrella term for a new and less material relationship between people and the forested landscape, a relationship that more recently has become a policy issue. In this case study we explore how forest-related values are conceptualised in the case of Dalasjo, in Vilhelmina, Sweden, where a recent process involving determining protection for social values took place in relation to, and simultaneous with, governmental considerations regarding the application of a social values concept. By means of focus group and key informant interviews, the study demonstrates that forest social values are not only about forest per se, or even the physical and user values per se. Further, the diverse but still general understanding of forest social values on a policy level is demonstrated. This stands in contrast to the specific and place-based understanding of the local community, emanating from both individual and collective experiences. Thus, it is concluded that a policy use of social values terms, which may be difficult to identify from the outside, makes the definition of values in specific land use conflicts more complex rather than offering a possibility to immediately provide clear basis for planning tools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2020. Vol. 35, no 3-4, p. 177-185
Keywords [en]
Focus group interviews, place, policy processes
National Category
Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-171933DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2020.1754454ISI: 000532023600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084267455OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-171933DiVA, id: diva2:1443851
Available from: 2020-06-18 Created: 2020-06-18 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1417 kB)196 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1417 kBChecksum SHA-512
289bb302280dd933fe5f4362cd562767a64729a5c23ee8dd9282bfc6b4cb7a748435b3d244c67766d94743b07bfb6b2751583f8694c10ff968912b58c3fbea4d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Bergstén, SabinaKeskitalo, E. Carina H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergstén, SabinaKeskitalo, E. Carina H.
By organisation
Department of Geography
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 196 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 314 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf