Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Improving alternatives assessment of plastic additives: exploring in silico tools to identify less hazardous flame retardants
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry. (Patrik Andersson's research group)
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Alternatives assessment is applied for replacing hazardous chemicals with viable, safer substitutes. High quality experimental hazard data, however, are usually unavailable for this purpose, and obtaining in silico data is the only approach to fill in data gaps. In silico tools also have the advantage of providing a large amount of data with much lower cost and time requirements.

The aim of this PhD project was to explore the use of in silico tools for alternatives assessment, and develop practical tools for alternatives assessment of organic plastic additives. For this purpose, flame retardants were used as case chemicals. The major results were:

1. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for endocrine disruption were developed and explored (Paper I and II). These developed models were able to identify chemical properties that impact the binding affinities of brominated organic chemicals with estrogen-related receptor γ (Paper I), and to predict the androgen receptor activity of several organic chemicals, including flame retardants (Paper II);

2. A hazard ranking tool was developed for alternatives assessment based on the hazard properties of persistence (P), bioaccumulation (B), mobility in the aquatic environment (M) and toxicity (T). The flame retardant decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and 16 of its alternatives were taken as case chemicals to develop the tool. From a comparison of experimental and in silico data for these case chemicals, hazard data predicted by in silico tools were identified as the more suitable data source for the hazard ranking tool as the experimental data were confounded by large data gaps (Paper III);

3. The inclusion of chemical transformation products for the hazard ranking tool were studied with the case of decaBDE and its alternatives. Several in silico tools were used to predict transformation products, and a strategy for prioritizing chemical transformations with high occurrence potential in the environment was developed (Paper IV);

4. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools were used to evaluate diverse P, B, M and T endpoints of parent compounds (Paper III) and their transformation products (Paper IV) simultaneously based on in silico data. Three different MCDA methods were explored, and one of them was developed to include the consideration of uncertainties of in silico data;

5. In the studied case of decaBDE alternatives, the three different MCDA methods generally agreed on the most and least hazardous alternatives. With the consideration of hazard for the studied flame retardants and their in silico predicted transformation products, two alternatives, melamine and bis(2-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate, were identified as the least hazardous of considered alternatives for decaBDE (Paper III and IV);

6. It is critical for the exposure aspect of alternatives assessment to identify the key properties that influence the emission process. For this, a fast measuring method for the emission of polymer additives was developed based on a Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM). Empirical linear models were applied to describe the emission patterns (Weibull model) to better understand the chemical mechanism behind the emissions of organophosphate flame retardants from various polymers. The results showed that the octanol-water partitioning coefficient and molecular size are key parameters for the emission process, but also showed that the emission process is complex and is likely driven by a combination of both polymer and additive properties, as well as their interactions (Paper V).

This research shows how alternatives assessment can make more effective use of in silico tools. and it also highlights current challenges in the use of these in silico tools that require further development. The next steps to make a holistic alternatives assessment would include an exposure assessment procedure based on the work in Paper V, and combining this with the hazard ranking tools (developed in Paper III and IV), including information on technical feasibilities, economic feasibilities, and also life cycle impacts. The MCDA methods for hazard ranking in Paper III and IV can be further adapted for the decision component of such a more complete alternatives assessment for specific uses of chemicals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University , 2021. , p. 51
Keywords [en]
Chemical alternatives assessment, plastic additives, flame retardants, hazard, emission, in silico, modeling, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
National Category
Organic Chemistry Environmental Sciences
Research subject
environmental science; Organic Chemistry; Ecotoxicology; Toxicology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-182073ISBN: 978-91-7855-475-1 (electronic)ISBN: 978-91-7855-476-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-182073DiVA, id: diva2:1542644
Public defence
2021-05-06, Glasburen, KBC-huset, Linnaeus väg 6, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 942-2015-672Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-08 Last updated: 2021-05-04Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Structure-dependent activity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and their hydroxylated metabolites on estrogen related receptor gamma: in vitro and in silico study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Structure-dependent activity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and their hydroxylated metabolites on estrogen related receptor gamma: in vitro and in silico study
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 52, no 15, p. 8894-8902Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERR gamma) is an orphan nuclear receptor having functional cross-talk with classical estrogen receptors. Here, we investigated whether ERR gamma is a potential target 8 of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and their hydroxylated metabolites (OH-PBDEs). By using a fluorescence competitive binding method established in our laboratory, the binding potencies of 30 PBDEs/OH-PBDEs with ERR gamma were determined for the first time. All of the tested OH-PBDEs and some PBDEs bound to ERR gamma with K-d values ranging from 0.13-13.61 mu M. The OH-PBDEs showed much higher binding potency than their parent PBDEs. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model was developed to analyze the chemical binding potencies in relation to their structural and chemical characteristics. The QSAR model indicated that the molecular size, relative ratios of aromatic atoms, and hydrogen bond donors and acceptors were crucial factors for PBDEs/OH-PBDEs binding. By using a reporter gene assay, we found that most of the low-brominated PBDEs/OH-PBDEs exerted agonistic activity toward ERR gamma, while high-brominated PBDEs/OH-PBDEs had no effect on the basal ERR gamma activity. The docking results showed that the low-brominated PBDEs/OH-PBDEs tended to take an agonistic binding mode while the high-brominated ones tended to take an antagonistic binding mode. Overall, our results suggest ERR gamma to be a potential novel target for PBDEs/OH-PBDEs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Chemical Society (ACS), 2018
National Category
Other Chemistry Topics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151394 (URN)10.1021/acs.est.8b02509 (DOI)000441477600091 ()30005570 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85050009923 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2018-09-05 Created: 2018-09-05 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
2. CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity
Open this publication in new window or tab >>CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Health Perspectives, ISSN 0091-6765, E-ISSN 1552-9924, Vol. 128, no 2, p. 1-17, article id 027002Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling.

OBJECTIVES: In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP).

METHODS: The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP's list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast (TM) metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast (TM)/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays.

RESULTS: The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set.

DISCUSSION: The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of similar to 875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment.

National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169387 (URN)10.1289/EHP5580 (DOI)000518589800006 ()32074470 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85079531920 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2020-04-01 Created: 2020-04-01 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
3. Combining in Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: A Case Study of Decabromodiphenyl Ether Alternatives
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Combining in Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: A Case Study of Decabromodiphenyl Ether Alternatives
2019 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 53, no 11, p. 6341-6351Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Alternatives assessment is applied for minimizing the risk of unintentionally replacing a hazardous chemical with another hazardous chemical. Central challenges are the diversity of properties to consider and the lack of high-quality experimental data. To address this, a novel alternatives assessment procedure was developed based on in silico data and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods. As a case study, 16 alternatives to the flame retardant decabromodiphenyl ether were considered. The hazard properties included persistence (P), bioaccumulation potential (B), toxicities (T), and mobility in water (M). Databases were consulted and 2866 experimental data points were collected for the target chemicals; however, these were mostly replicate data points for some hazard criteria for a subset of alternatives. Therefore, in silico data and three MCDA strategies were tested including heat mapping, multiattribute utility theory (MAUT), and Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite (ELECTRE III). The heat map clearly showed that none of the target chemicals are hazard-free, whereas MAUT and ELECTRE III agreed on ranking the "least worst" choices. This study identified several challenges and the complexity in the alternatives assessment processes motivating more case studies combining in silico and MCDA approaches.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Chemical Society (ACS), 2019
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-161452 (URN)10.1021/acs.est.8b07163 (DOI)000470793900024 ()31081616 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85066782966 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 942-2015-672
Available from: 2019-07-10 Created: 2019-07-10 Last updated: 2023-03-23Bibliographically approved
4. Combining in Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: Accounting for the Transformation Products of decaBDE and Its Alternatives
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Combining in Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: Accounting for the Transformation Products of decaBDE and Its Alternatives
2021 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 55Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Transformation products ought to be an important consideration in chemical alternatives assessment. In this study, a recently established hazard ranking tool for alternatives assessment based on in silico data and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods was further developed to include chemical transformation products. Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and five proposed alternatives were selected as case chemicals; biotic and abiotic transformation reactions were considered using five in silico tools. A workflow was developed to select transformation products with the highest occurrence potential. The most probable transformation products of the alternative chemicals were often similarly persistent but more mobile in aquatic environments, which implies an increasing exposure potential. When persistence (P), bioaccumulation (B), mobility in the aquatic environment (M), and toxicity (T) are considered (via PBT, PMT, or PBMT composite scoring), all six flame retardants have at least one transformation product that can be considered more hazardous, across diverse MCDA. Even when considering transformation products, the considered alternatives remain less hazardous than decaBDE, though the range of hazard of the five alternatives was reduced. The least hazardous of the considered alternatives were melamine and bis(2-ethylhexyl)-tetrabromophthalate. This developed tool could be integrated within holistic alternatives assessments considering use and life cycle impacts or additionally prioritizing transformation products within (bio)monitoring screening studies.

National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-180505 (URN)10.1021/acs.est.0c02593 (DOI)000612354700030 ()2-s2.0-85100125116 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2021-02-25 Created: 2021-02-25 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved
5. Studies of Emission Processes of Polymer Additives into Water Using Quartz Crystal Microbalance-A Case Study on Organophosphate Esters
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Studies of Emission Processes of Polymer Additives into Water Using Quartz Crystal Microbalance-A Case Study on Organophosphate Esters
2020 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 54, no 8, p. 4876-4885Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Plastic materials contain various additives, which can be released during the entire lifespan of plastics and pose a threat to the environment and human health. Despite our knowledge on leakage of additives from products, accurate and rapid approaches to study emission kinetics are largely lacking, in particular, methodologies that can provide in-depth understanding of polymer/additive interactions. Here, we report on a novel approach using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) to measure emissions of additives to water from polymer films spin-coated on quartz crystals. The methodology, being accurate and reproducible with a standard error of +/- 2.4%, was applied to a range of organophosphate esters (OPEs) and polymers with varying physicochemical properties. The release of most OPEs reached an apparent steady-state within 10 h. The release curves for the studied OPEs could be fitted using a Weibull model, which shows that the release is a two-phase process with an initial fast phase driven by partitioning of OPEs readily available at or close to the polymer film surface, and a slower phase dominated by diffusion in the polymer. The kinetics of the first emission phase was mainly correlated with the hydrophobicity of the OPEs, whereas the diffusion phase was weakly correlated with molecular size. The developed QCM-based method for assessing and studying release of organic chemicals from a polymeric matrix is well suited for rapid screening of additives in efforts to identify more sustainable replacement polymer additives with lower emission potential.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Chemical Society (ACS), 2020
National Category
Physical Chemistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-170793 (URN)10.1021/acs.est.9b07607 (DOI)000527738300020 ()32186175 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85083912998 (Scopus ID)
Funder
The Kempe FoundationsCarl Tryggers foundation Swedish Research Council Formas
Available from: 2020-05-27 Created: 2020-05-27 Last updated: 2024-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1465 kB)376 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1465 kBChecksum SHA-512
2f0805cb51f338fb2df2c889d927aba82fc23ae9dd086682bac8ed0cd45d2bb70e4b6c08a47a33957461e3ee0bc4e59841891ec4fd6c31931b39b779e72d4246
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
errata(239 kB)59 downloads
File information
File name ERRATA01.pdfFile size 239 kBChecksum SHA-512
35374a8e339133dae517ea61a6c7177a87699ef73c0fdff218a1457ad7f4fa913811a1e1cb6be40b1d1fd8d6848bc8e9900ab6f4f8de426a79865940d766e960
Type errataMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(383 kB)59 downloads
File information
File name SPIKBLAD01.pdfFile size 383 kBChecksum SHA-512
937e8ffce104c5f55961e5d51fb65b1e8173fc156092763628f3536ca22254de2baf2503d0b644dc23d9df38f78372d3dcf2f948729c2c22dfb4a429ed592803
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Zheng, Ziye

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zheng, Ziye
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
Organic ChemistryEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 382 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 922 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf