Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mucosal blood flow in the remaining rectal stump is more affected by total than partial mesorectal excision in patients undergoing anterior resection: a key to understanding differing rates of anastomotic leakage?
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3517-4302
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery. Department of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5279-3888
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8601-0159
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery (Print), ISSN 1435-2443, E-ISSN 1435-2451, Vol. 406, no 6, p. 1971-1977Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: Anterior resection is the procedure of choice for tumours in the mid and upper rectum. Depending on tumour height, a total mesorectal excision (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME) can be performed. Low anastomoses in particular have a high risk of developing anastomotic leakage, which might be explained by blood perfusion compromise. A pilot study indicated a worse blood flow in TME patients in an open setting. The aim of this study was to further evaluate perianastomotic blood perfusion changes in relation to TME and PME in a predominantly laparoscopic context.

METHOD: In this prospective cohort study, laser Doppler flowmetry was used to evaluate the perianastomotic colonic and rectal perfusion before and after surgery. The two surgical techniques were compared in terms of mean differences of perfusion units using a repeated measures ANOVA design, which also enabled interaction analyses between type of mesorectal excision and location of measurement. Anastomotic leakage until 90 days after surgery was reported for descriptive purposes.

RESULTS: Some 28 patients were available for analysis: 17 TME and 11 PME patients. TME patients had a reduced blood perfusion postoperatively compared to PME patients in the aboral posterior area (mean difference: -57 vs 18 perfusion units; p = 0.010). An interaction between mesorectal excision type and anterior/posterior location was detected at the aboral level (p = 0.007). Two patients developed a minor leakage, diagnosed after discharge.

CONCLUSION: Patients operated on using TME have a decreased blood flow in the aboral posterior quadrant of the rectum postoperatively compared to patients operated on using PME. This might explain differing rates of anastomotic leakage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02401100.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2021. Vol. 406, no 6, p. 1971-1977
Keywords [en]
Flowmetry, Laser Doppler, PME, Perfusion, Rectal cancer, TME
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-183305DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02182-0ISI: 000651725700001PubMedID: 34008097Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106295843OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-183305DiVA, id: diva2:1556381
Funder
Knut and Alice Wallenberg FoundationCancerforskningsfonden i NorrlandAvailable from: 2021-05-21 Created: 2021-05-21 Last updated: 2023-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(439 kB)248 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 439 kBChecksum SHA-512
e2118d0a2d0a72b1880bf77a9cf78ca1806485890b481fa6b58c1563efd2c3f87ac8315801b3b97f593e915cf5e39950e2fb9cf2e49d916175f22798e67ae71a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Back, ErikBrännström, FredrikSvensson, JohanRutegård, JörgenHaapamäki, Markku MRutegård, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Back, ErikBrännström, FredrikSvensson, JohanRutegård, JörgenHaapamäki, Markku MRutegård, Martin
By organisation
SurgeryStatisticsWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine at Umeå University (WCMM)
In the same journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery (Print)
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 305 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 760 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf