Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cervico-thoracic pain and associated impairments in air force personnel: a cross-sectional study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6871-1341
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Swedish Armed Forces, HQ, Stockholm, Sweden.
2021 (English)In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, E-ISSN 1471-2474, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 441Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Pain and impaired function in the cervical region are common in Air Force personnel (AFP), but evidence is limited regarding the thoracic region. This cross-sectional cohort study examined associations between cervico-thoracic pain and physical performance among Swedish AFP and explored possible differences and similarities in test performance between fighter pilots (FP), helicopter pilots (HP) and rear crew (RC).

Methods: AFP (n = 73) from one airbase performed eight tests of movement control of the spine, active cervical range of motion (ROM) in all six directions and isometric strength and endurance of the cervical flexors and extensors. The association between test performance and cervico-thoracic pain (based on the ‘Musculoskeletal screening protocol’ questionnaire) were analysed in a multiple binary logistic regression model.

Results: For AFP with cervico-thoracic pain (30%), movement control was impaired in the ‘neck flexion test’ (OR [95%CI] =3.61 [1.06–12.34]) and the ‘forward lean test’ (OR [95%CI] =3.43[1.04–11.37]), together with reduced flexion ROM (OR [95%CI] =0.93 [0.87–0.99]). Test performance was in general similar between the three groups, but FP and HP could control the ‘forward lean test’ to a significantly higher degree than RC (p = 0.000). Further, FP showed significantly greater ROM in lateral flexion to the right compared to HP and RC (mean: 40.3°, 36.2° and 33.4°, respectively, p = 0.000), and they showed higher, although not significant, flexor strength than RC (p = 0.026).

Conclusions: The impaired function associated with cervico-thoracic pain highlights the need for a deeper understanding of such relationships when designing tools to systematically optimize the physical performance and prevent pain among AFP. Studies with a longitudinal design are warranted to examine any causative associations between pain and impairments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2021. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 441
Keywords [en]
Fighter pilots, Helicopter pilots, Isometric strength and endurance, Movement control, Musculoskeletal disorders, Neck pain, Physical performance, Prevention, Range of motion, Rear crew
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-183627DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04301-wISI: 000656274500003PubMedID: 33990194Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85105815972OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-183627DiVA, id: diva2:1557906
Available from: 2021-05-27 Created: 2021-05-27 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Musculoskeletal disorders in Swedish military aircrew: screening and clinical examination of the cervico-thoracic region
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Musculoskeletal disorders in Swedish military aircrew: screening and clinical examination of the cervico-thoracic region
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a common and growing occupational problem in military aircrew. Intervention studies attempting to reduce such issues have only showed limited preventive effects. Furthermore, in-depth knowledge of the clinical presentation of aircrew members with painful episodes is lacking. This thesis was conducted to add evidence to the ongoing work of the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) for the prevention of MSD. The overall aim of this thesis was to estimate the occurrence of MSD in general and specifically cervico-thoracic pain and its associated factors among SAF aircrew and to evaluate clinically relevant tests, prior to the adaptation of a musculoskeletal screening protocol (MSP) for use in the SAF medical health care system. 

All participants included in the four studies of this thesis were employed in the SAF. Two cross-sectional studies (Study I; n=351, Study III; n=73) aimed to establish the occurrence of MSD in aircrew compared with army deployed soldiers (Study I) and between fighter pilots, helicopter pilots and rear crew (Study I), as well as identify associated factors of cervical, thoracic and shoulder region pain (Study I) and cervico-thoracic pain (Study III). Study II had a test-retest design and aimed to examine inter-rater (n=37) and test-retest (n=45) reliability of movement control tests. In study III, test performance was compared between fighter pilots, helicopter pilots and rear crew. Study IV had a cross-sectional (n=18) and a prospective observational cohort (n=47) design and aimed to explore physical symptoms and functional limitations in aircrew with cervico-thoracic pain, establish 12-month cumulative incidence and to identify risk factors for cervico-thoracic pain.

The main findings of this thesis were that when compared to deployed soldiers, military aircrew reported higher prevalence of MSD in the cervical, thoracic, shoulder, and lumbar regions (80% reported at least one painful area during the previous year). Working as aircrew, and a lower rating of one’s physical health, were significantly associated with pain in the cervical, thoracic and shoulder regions (Study I). Two physical therapists could reliably rate movement patterns for the majority of movement control tests in the affected areas. Lower reliability was however seen for test-retest conditions (Study II). Movement control and measures of cervical range of motion (ROM), but not cervical strength and endurance, were associated with cervico-thoracic pain among military aircrew. Specifically, less control of both neck and lumbar flexion movements, and lesser cervical flexion ROM were associated with cervico-thoracic pain. Differences were found between fighter pilots, helicopter pilots and rear crew for lumbar flexion movement control and cervical lateral flexion ROM (Study III). Physical symptoms and functional impairments of aircrew with high (pain) intensity, flight-elicited and work-affecting cervico-thoracic pain showed an individual presentation. Previous pain episodes, lesser cervical flexion ROM, and lesser cervical flexor muscle endurance were identified as risk factors for future cervico-thoracic pain, which had a 12-month cumulative incidence of 23% (Study IV).

Findings from this thesis strongly indicate that MSD in SAF aircrew is an occupational problem that need to be solved. The cervico-thoracic region was especially common in SAF aircrew. Movement control can reliably be assessed, but with less stability for repeated measures. While pain history and physical performance can to some degree be used to identify aircrew at risk for further cervico-thoracic pain, the clinical presentation of their physical symptoms showed individual presentation. The effects of implementing the MSP in the SAF as a primary and secondary preventive intervention, as well as rehabilitative strategies, need be systematically evaluated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2021. p. 74
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2167
Keywords
Musculoskeletal disorders, Pain, Swedish Armed Forces, aircrew, pilots, physiotherapy, reliability
National Category
Physiotherapy
Research subject
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-190218 (URN)978-91-7855-714-1 (ISBN)978-91-7855-713-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-01-21, Aula biologica, Biologihuset, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Armed Forces
Available from: 2021-12-17 Created: 2021-12-10 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(668 kB)247 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 668 kBChecksum SHA-512
b3217bb50b53ca0dfda49a7c9c7a6b679411a29adec355af3f1a65903d9b3eff95f67c2afd63724a56b58ecf6252b7f94ec2b7eb9022cb9ab4b3a528a96293e9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Tegern, MatthiasAasa, Ulrika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tegern, MatthiasAasa, Ulrika
By organisation
Section of Physiotherapy
In the same journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 248 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 491 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf