Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Eligibility for faricimab in a real-world neovascular age-related macular degeneration population: a cross-sectional study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Integrative Medical Biology (IMB).
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Integrative Medical Biology (IMB).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6785-2895
2022 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 12, no 9, article id e065001Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility of a real-world neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) population for the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials (testing faricimab), and to compare the eligible real-world patients to trial participants. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we used data from the Swedish Macula Registry (SMR) between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020. Persons were eligible if they fulfilled the main inclusion criteria in TENAYA and LUCERNE: (1) nAMD diagnosis, (2) treatment naïve, (3) ≥50 years and (4) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 78-24 letters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics at the original visit of the eligible SMR population and baseline data from the clinical trials were compared. RESULTS: In total, 27 962 individuals with nAMD were registered in SMR. A total of 15 399 (55%) individuals were treatment naïve; of these, 15 368 (55%) were ≥50 years and 13 265 (47%) also had BCVA of 78-24 letters and fulfilled eligibility. Among treatment-naïve individuals, 86% were eligible and the BCVA criterion was the most common reason for non-eligibility. The eligible SMR population was significantly older than either TENAYA or LUCERNE. SMR included more women and patients with worse visual acuity than TENAYA, while SMR patients were diagnosed more quickly than LUCERNE. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the real-world nAMD population in SMR fulfilled the main inclusion criteria of the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials. Among treatment-naïve individuals, 86% were eligible. Marginally differences were shown between the eligible SMR population and the trial populations. The SMR population were older and more similar to the population in LUCERNE than TENAYA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2022. Vol. 12, no 9, article id e065001
Keywords [en]
clinical trials, ophthalmology, public health
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-199669DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065001ISI: 000853828800006PubMedID: 36096541Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85137665730OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-199669DiVA, id: diva2:1704059
Available from: 2022-10-17 Created: 2022-10-17 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(308 kB)216 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 308 kBChecksum SHA-512
73629f33db7f61bb79ab45360a99bf7663ac0e23e66b479e0393e2d27672f5a0c3a43bd2ae976b158c76cbdf9ea827a3a9ab36a4691997b13121bf6a8a6ed39f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Norberg, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norberg, Helena
By organisation
Department of Integrative Medical Biology (IMB)Ophthalmology
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 217 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 959 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf