Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
NordForsk as a facilitator of integrated research on the Arctic
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2020 (English)In: Nordic perspectives on the responsible development of the Arctic: pathways to action / [ed] Douglas C. Nord, Springer, 2020, , p. 23p. 23-45Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter presents a brief history of how NordForsk’s research program the Responsible Development of the Arctic came to be launched. After 2011, when Nordic cooperation on Arctic issues was first raised, a range of preparatory and planning activities were organized by NordForsk. Four years later, these resulted in support for four Centres of Excellence with the highest budget so far allocated to a NordForsk research program. The chapter begins with an analysis of what was the state of science and society, both in the Nordic region and beyond, when the program was initiated. It then provides an overview of the essential features of the processes and organizational arrangements that led to the launch of the program. The analysis is focused on what made it possible for NordForsk to produce integrated knowledge of relevance that would provide a better understanding of the situation in the Arctic. It is argued that four cornerstones constituted the basis for accomplishing this. These were: (1) Key actors in the Nordic region and beyond who had started to realize that increased incentives for research cooperation across borders were needed; (2) There was dialogue and commitment to take joint action between policymakers in the Nordic research and political arenas; (3) Needs-driven and fundamental research started to be seen as two sides of the same coin rather than competing approaches; and (4) There was careful management of the processes from planning, to the production of new knowledge. Still another factor of critical importance was the work done by professional and dedicated people e.g. administrators, experts, advisors etc., who maintained pressure for reaching the goal of securing new knowledge of high scientific quality and relevance to change in and beyond the Arctic region.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. , p. 23p. 23-45
Series
Springer Polar Sciences, ISSN 2510-0475, E-ISSN 2510-0483
Keywords [en]
Arctic development, Cross-disciplinarity, Global challenges, NordForsk
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-209310DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52324-4_2Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85159420912ISBN: 978-3-030-52323-7 (print)ISBN: 978-3-030-52326-8 (print)ISBN: 978-3-030-52324-4 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-209310DiVA, id: diva2:1763947
Available from: 2023-06-08 Created: 2023-06-08 Last updated: 2023-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusPublisher's full text

Authority records

Gustafsson, Gunnel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustafsson, Gunnel
By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf