Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development and validation of the InEquality in organisations Scale (InE-S): a measure based on Acker’s inequality regimes
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4263-8080
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9627-4625
2024 (English)In: Gender in Management, ISSN 1754-2413, E-ISSN 1754-2421, Vol. 39, no 4, p. 480-496Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale that can be used to assess inequality at work based on gender, age and ethnicity that is grounded in Acker’s (2006) inequality regimes.

Design/methodology/approach: The authors used three representative samples (total N = 1,806) of Swedish teachers, nurses and social workers to develop and validate the scale. The validation process included the assessment of content validity, confirmatory factor analysis for factorial validity, internal consistency and associations with theoretically warranted outcomes and related constructs to assess criterion-related validity and convergent validity.

Findings: The authors found evidence supporting the content, factorial, criterion-related and convergent validity of the InEquality in organisations Scale (InE-S). Furthermore, the scale demonstrated high internal consistency.

Originality/value: The newly developed scale InE-S may be used to further the understanding of how inequality at work influences employees. This study makes a contribution to the current literature by providing a scale that, for the first time, can test Acker’s hypotheses using quantitative methods to demonstrate the consequences of inequality at work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2024. Vol. 39, no 4, p. 480-496
Keywords [en]
Inequality at work, Acker’s inequality regimes, Scale development, Multivariate quantitative methods
National Category
Sociology Gender Studies Psychology
Research subject
Sociology; Psychology; gender studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-213772DOI: 10.1108/gm-01-2022-0007ISI: 001048768000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85168146153OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-213772DiVA, id: diva2:1792275
Part of project
Can workplace conflict be constructive? A study of conflict and mental health in women dominated work place from a gender perspective, Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2016-07176Available from: 2023-08-29 Created: 2023-08-29 Last updated: 2024-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(455 kB)54 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 455 kBChecksum SHA-512
ab670e39071355046a558936c6adfdd2e32991c9b47ec0e96d55a7868af0af9594ade29a6244b12403ddb21f21d47f14c2ce4f340784869a659c3fa05247de62
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tafvelin, SusanneKeisu, Britt-Inger

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tafvelin, SusanneKeisu, Britt-Inger
By organisation
Department of PsychologyDepartment of SociologyUmeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS)
In the same journal
Gender in Management
SociologyGender StudiesPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 497 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 451 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf