Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applying machine learning to media analysis improves our understanding of forest conflicts
Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6289-9427
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies. Department of History of Science and Ideas, Uppsala Univeristy, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1450-5857
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7674-6197
2024 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 144, article id 107254Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Conflicts over the management and governance of forests seem to be increasing. Previous media studies in this area have largely focused on analysing the portrayal of specific conflicts. This study aims to review how a broad range of forest conflicts are portrayed in the Swedish media, analysing their temporal, spatial, and relational dimensions. We applied topic modelling, a machine learning approach, to analyse 53,600 articles published in the Swedish daily press between 2012 and 2022. We identified 916 topics, of which 94 were of interest for this study. Our results showed ten areas of forest conflicts: hunting and fishing (35 % of total coverage), energy (24 %), recreation and tourism (11 %), nature conservation (8 %), forest damages (6 %), international issues (5 %), forestry (5 %), reindeer husbandry (4 %), media and politics (2 %), and mining (1 %). The overall coverage of forest conflicts increased significantly over the study period, potentially reflecting an actual increase in forest conflicts. Some of the conflicts were continuously reported upon over time, while the coverage of others exhibited seasonal or event-related patterns. Four conflicts received most of their coverage in specific regions, while others were covered across the whole of Sweden. A relational analysis of the conflicts revealed three clusters of forest conflicts focused respectively on industrial, cultural, and conservation conflicts. Our results emphasise the value of using topic modelling to understand the overall patterns and trends of the media coverage of current land use conflicts, while also highlighting potential areas of emerging conflicts that may be of special interest for planners and policy-makers to monitor and manage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 144, article id 107254
Keywords [en]
Forest policy, Agenda-setting power, Daily press, Topic modelling, BERTopic
National Category
History of Science and Ideas Political Science Media and Communications Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-227604DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107254ISI: 001262456900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85197480879OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-227604DiVA, id: diva2:1880273
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2017–01956Available from: 2024-07-01 Created: 2024-07-01 Last updated: 2025-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4114 kB)122 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4114 kBChecksum SHA-512
bc3f1b59feaa1984f45410c34f3c05a6d720d9ead04f6a08b1437e548bfe54615f25c3556073b72206250c2096fe76cf915b897cad0c694ad18c21262164d30e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindgren, SimonSamuelsson, JonatanSandström, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindgren, SimonSamuelsson, JonatanSandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of SociologyDepartment of historical, philosophical and religious studiesDepartment of Political Science
In the same journal
Land use policy
History of Science and IdeasPolitical ScienceMedia and CommunicationsSociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 122 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 748 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf