Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Connect, collaborate and tailor: a model of community engagement through infographic design during the COVID-19 pandemic
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, ON, Waterloo, Canada.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, ON, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6833-7601
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, ON, Waterloo, Canada.
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, ON, Waterloo, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 24, no 1, article id 2551Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Across the globe, racial and ethnic minorities have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 with increased risk of infection and burden from disease. Vaccine hesitancy has contributed to variation in vaccine uptake and compromised population-based vaccination programs in many countries. Connect, Collaborate and Tailor (CCT) is a Public Health Agency of Canada funded project to make new connections between public health, healthcare professionals and underserved communities in order to create culturally adapted communication about COVID-19 vaccines. This paper describes the CCT process and outcomes as a community engagement model that identified information gaps and created tailored tools to address misinformation and improve vaccine acceptance.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with CCT participants were undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of CCT in identifying and addressing topics of concern to underserved and ethnic minority communities. Interviews also explored CCT participants’ experiences of collaboration through the development of new partnerships between ethnic minority communities, public health and academic researchers, and the evolution of co-operation sharing ideas and creating infographics. Thematic analysis was used to produce representative themes. The activities described were aligned with the levels of public engagement described in the IAP2 spectrum (International Association for Public Participation).

Results: Analysis of interviews (n = 14) revealed that shared purpose and urgency in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic motivated co-operation among CCT participants. Acknowledgement of past harm, present health, and impact of social inequities on public service access was an essential first step in establishing trust. Creating safe spaces for open dialogue led to successful, iterative cycles of consultation and feedback between participants; a process that not only helped create tailored infographics but also deepened engagement and collaboration. Over time, the infographic material development was increasingly directed by community representatives’ commentary on their groups’ real-time needs and communication preferences. This feedback noticeably guided the choice, style, and presentation of infographic content while also directing dissemination strategies and vaccine confidence building activities.

Conclusions: The CCT process to create COVID-19 vaccine communication materials led to evolving co-operation between groups who had not routinely worked together before; strong community engagement was a key driver of change. Ensuring a respectful environment for open dialogue and visibly using feedback to create information products provided a foundation for building relationships. Finally, our data indicate participants sought reinforcement of close cooperative ties and continued investment in shared responsibility for community partnership-based public health.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 24, no 1, article id 2551
Keywords [en]
Community engagement, COVID-19 pandemic, Public health communication, Vaccination, Vaccine confidence, Vaccine hesitancy, Vaccine inequity
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-230024DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20037-3ISI: 001317068900015PubMedID: 39300382Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204378207OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-230024DiVA, id: diva2:1902660
Available from: 2024-10-02 Created: 2024-10-02 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1432 kB)69 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1432 kBChecksum SHA-512
2616b5961e48dcea1918da6b1280097fc8334c6ebf629e0744312b93d424ef6e5ceb1f257a403424d82b2d3cebde92dee0d460b8011c45880a97d0f07278c00c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Tetui, Moses

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tetui, Moses
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 73 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 235 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf